Literature DB >> 24445740

Biomarkers for kidney transplant rejection.

Denise J Lo1, Bruce Kaplan2, Allan D Kirk1.   

Abstract

The immune management of organ transplant recipients is imperfect. Beyond general dosing guidelines for immunosuppressive agents and clinical diagnostic tests for rejection or infection, there are few objective tools to determine the aggregate status of a patient's alloimmune response or protective immune capacity. The lack of prognostic precision significantly contributes to patient morbidity and reduces long-term allograft survival after kidney transplantation. Noninvasive biomarkers that could serve as predictive tools or surrogate end points for rejection might help clinicians individualize immunosuppression and allow for early intervention, ideally prior to clinically evident organ dysfunction. Although the growing understanding of organ rejection has provided numerous candidate biomarkers, none has been confirmed in robust validation studies as sufficiently useful to guide clinical practice independent of traditional clinical methods. In this Review, the general characteristics of biomarkers and surrogate end points; current biomarkers under active clinical investigation; and the prominent barriers to the translation of biomarkers into clinical practice are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24445740     DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2013.281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol        ISSN: 1759-5061            Impact factor:   28.314


  83 in total

Review 1.  Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework.

Authors: 
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Chemokines: directing leukocyte infiltration into allografts.

Authors:  Tarek el-Sawy; Nader M Fahmy; Robert L Fairchild
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 7.486

3.  Messenger RNA for FOXP3 in the urine of renal-allograft recipients.

Authors:  Thangamani Muthukumar; Darshana Dadhania; Ruchuang Ding; Catherine Snopkowski; Rubina Naqvi; Jun B Lee; Choli Hartono; Baogui Li; Vijay K Sharma; Surya V Seshan; Sandip Kapur; Wayne W Hancock; Joseph E Schwartz; Manikkam Suthanthiran
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  To biopsy or not to biopsy? Should we screen the histology of stable renal grafts?

Authors:  Olivier Thaunat; Christophe Legendre; Emmanuel Morelon; Henry Kreis; Marie-France Mamzer-Bruneel
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  Quantitative detection of immune activation transcripts as a diagnostic tool in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  J Strehlau; M Pavlakis; M Lipman; M Shapiro; L Vasconcellos; W Harmon; T B Strom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Assessing relative risks of infection and rejection: a meta-analysis using an immune function assay.

Authors:  Richard J Kowalski; Diane R Post; Roslyn B Mannon; Anthony Sebastian; Harlan I Wright; Gary Sigle; James Burdick; Kareem Abu Elmagd; Adriana Zeevi; Mayra Lopez-Cepero; John A Daller; H Albin Gritsch; Elaine F Reed; Johann Jonsson; Douglas Hawkins; Judith A Britz
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 4.939

7.  Summary of FDA antibody-mediated rejection workshop.

Authors:  P Archdeacon; M Chan; C Neuland; E Velidedeoglu; J Meyer; L Tracy; M Cavaille-Coll; S Bala; A Hernandez; R Albrecht
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels.

Authors:  Huili Guo; Nicholas T Ingolia; Jonathan S Weissman; David P Bartel
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Lack of benefit of early protocol biopsies in renal transplant patients receiving TAC and MMF: a randomized study.

Authors:  D Rush; D Arlen; A Boucher; S Busque; S M Cockfield; C Girardin; G Knoll; J-G Lachance; D Landsberg; J Shapiro; A Shoker; S Yilmaz
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 8.086

10.  Reproducibility of the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology. Inter- and intraobserver variation.

Authors:  N Marcussen; T S Olsen; H Benediktsson; L Racusen; K Solez
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1995-11-27       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  45 in total

1.  Biomarkers for Chronic Rejection: In Angiotensin Proteins We Trust?

Authors:  Xian C Li
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Moving Beyond Minimization Trials in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Arthur J Matas; Robert S Gaston
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 3.  Immune biomarkers: the promises and pitfalls of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Joanna C D Willis; Graham M Lord
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 53.106

4.  Transplantation: Biomarkers in transplantation—the devil is in the detail.

Authors:  Michael Abecassis; Bruce Kaplan
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 5.  Moving Biomarkers toward Clinical Implementation in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  Madhav C Menon; Barbara Murphy; Peter S Heeger
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 6.  Transplant genetics and genomics.

Authors:  Joshua Y C Yang; Minnie M Sarwal
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Tissue-specific exosome biomarkers for noninvasively monitoring immunologic rejection of transplanted tissue.

Authors:  Prashanth Vallabhajosyula; Laxminarayana Korutla; Andreas Habertheuer; Ming Yu; Susan Rostami; Chao-Xing Yuan; Sanjana Reddy; Chengyang Liu; Varun Korutla; Brigitte Koeberlein; Jennifer Trofe-Clark; Michael R Rickels; Ali Naji
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  Circulating exosomes derived from transplanted progenitor cells aid the functional recovery of ischemic myocardium.

Authors:  Progyaparamita Saha; Sudhish Sharma; Laxminarayana Korutla; Srinivasa Raju Datla; Farnaz Shoja-Taheri; Rachana Mishra; Grace E Bigham; Malini Sarkar; David Morales; Gregory Bittle; Muthukumar Gunasekaran; Chetan Ambastha; Mir Yasir Arfat; Deqiang Li; Andreas Habertheuer; Robert Hu; Manu O Platt; Peixin Yang; Michael E Davis; Prashanth Vallabhajosyula; Sunjay Kaushal
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 9.  Through a glass darkly: seeking clarity in preventing late kidney transplant failure.

Authors:  Mark D Stegall; Robert S Gaston; Fernando G Cosio; Arthur Matas
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Orthogonal Comparison of Molecular Signatures of Kidney Transplants With Subclinical and Clinical Acute Rejection: Equivalent Performance Is Agnostic to Both Technology and Platform.

Authors:  S M Kurian; E Velazquez; R Thompson; T Whisenant; S Rose; N Riley; F Harrison; T Gelbart; J J Friedewald; J Charette; S Brietigam; J Peysakhovich; M R First; M M Abecassis; D R Salomon
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 8.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.