Literature DB >> 16969290

Assessing relative risks of infection and rejection: a meta-analysis using an immune function assay.

Richard J Kowalski1, Diane R Post, Roslyn B Mannon, Anthony Sebastian, Harlan I Wright, Gary Sigle, James Burdick, Kareem Abu Elmagd, Adriana Zeevi, Mayra Lopez-Cepero, John A Daller, H Albin Gritsch, Elaine F Reed, Johann Jonsson, Douglas Hawkins, Judith A Britz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term use of immunosuppressants is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. A simple whole blood assay that has U.S. Food and Drug Administration clearance directly assesses the net state of immune function of allograft recipients for better individualization of therapy. A meta-analysis of 504 solid organ transplant recipients (heart, kidney, kidney-pancreas, liver and small bowel) from 10 U.S. centers was performed using the Cylex ImmuKnow assay.
METHODS: Blood samples were taken from recipients at various times posttransplant and compared with clinical course (stable, rejection, infection). In this analysis, 39 biopsy-proven cellular rejections and 66 diagnosed infections occurred. Odds ratios of infection or rejection were calculated based on measured immune response values.
RESULTS: A recipient with an immune response value of 25 ng/ml adenosine triphosphate (ATP) was 12 times (95% confidence of 4 to 36) more likely to develop an infection than a recipient with a stronger immune response. Similarly, a recipient with an immune response of 700 ng/ml ATP was 30 times (95% confidence of 8 to 112) more likely to develop a cellular rejection than a recipient with a lower immune response value. Of note is the intersection of odds ratio curves for infection and rejection in the moderate immune response zone (280 ng/ml ATP). This intersection of risk curves provides an immunological target of immune function for solid organ recipients.
CONCLUSION: These data show that the Cylex ImmuKnow assay has a high negative predictive value and provides a target immunological response zone for minimizing risk and managing patients to stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16969290     DOI: 10.1097/01.tp.0000234837.02126.70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transplantation        ISSN: 0041-1337            Impact factor:   4.939


  63 in total

1.  New issues in heart transplantation for heart failure.

Authors:  Michelle M Kittleson
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-08

2.  Impact of perioperative probiotic treatment for surgical site infections in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Naoya Aisu; Shu Tanimura; Yuichi Yamashita; Kanefumi Yamashita; Kenji Maki; Yoichiro Yoshida; Takamitsu Sasaki; Shinsuke Takeno; Seiichiro Hoshino
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Immune biomarker panel monitoring utilizing IDO enzyme activity and CD4 ATP levels: prediction of acute rejection vs. viral replication events.

Authors:  Vikas R Dharnidharka; Sushil Gupta; Eihab Al Khasawneh; Allah Haafiz; Jonathan J Shuster; Douglas W Theriaque; Amir H Shahlaee; Timothy J Garrett
Journal:  Pediatr Transplant       Date:  2011-02-24

4.  Biomarker assessment of the immunomodulator effect of atorvastatin in stable renal transplant recipients and hypercholesterolemic patients.

Authors:  David Guillén; Federico Cofán; Emilio Ros; Olga Millán; Montse Cofán; Mercè Brunet
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 5.  Detecting adaptive immunity: applications in transplantation monitoring.

Authors:  Georg A Böhmig; Markus Wahrmann; Marcus D Säemann
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 4.074

Review 6.  Markers of acute rejection and graft acceptance in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Giacomo Germani; Kryssia Rodriguez-Castro; Francesco Paolo Russo; Marco Senzolo; Alberto Zanetto; Alberto Ferrarese; Patrizia Burra
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Current status of immunosuppression in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Narendra S Choudhary; Sanjiv Saigal; Rajat Shukla; Hardik Kotecha; Neeraj Saraf; Arvinder S Soin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Hepatol       Date:  2013-06-03

8.  Myc and AP-1 expression in T cells and T-cell activation in patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Shivtia Trop-Steinberg; Yehudith Azar; Rachel Bringer; Reuven Or
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 9.  Biomarkers in Solid Organ Transplantation.

Authors:  John Choi; Albana Bano; Jamil Azzi
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 1.935

10.  CD4+ lymphocyte adenosine triphosphate determination in sepsis: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kevin L Lawrence; Patrick H White; Gerald P Morris; Jody Jennemann; Donna L Phelan; Richard S Hotchkiss; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.