Russell Dibb1, Wei Li, Gary Cofer, Chunlei Liu. 1. Center for In Vivo Microscopy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA; Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: MR histology based on magnetic susceptibility can be used to visualize diamagnetic myelin (and its deterioration) in the central nervous system and is facilitated by the application of high magnetic field strengths and paramagnetic contrast agents. Characterizing the effect of these tools will aid in assessing white matter myelin content and microstructure. METHODS: Image data from six gadolinium-perfused mouse brain specimens were acquired at 2.0, 7.0, and 9.4 Tesla. Magnetic susceptibility contrast was analyzed for its dependence on field strength, gadolinium concentration, and white matter fiber orientation. A model for this contrast is presented based on the three-pool model for white matter. RESULTS: The specimen data illustrate that white-gray matter susceptibility contrast is field strength independent. White-gray matter contrast improves significantly as a function of gadolinium contrast agent in the tissue, i.e., white matter appears increasingly more diamagnetic relative to gray matter. The simulated data from the model suggest that susceptibility anisotropy of white matter fiber bundles increases nonlinearly as a function of gadolinium concentration due to contrast agent compartmentalization into the extracellular white matter water pool. CONCLUSION: Using contrast agents in MR histology facilitates white-gray matter susceptibility contrast modulation and the probing of white matter microstructure and orientation.
PURPOSE: MR histology based on magnetic susceptibility can be used to visualize diamagnetic myelin (and its deterioration) in the central nervous system and is facilitated by the application of high magnetic field strengths and paramagnetic contrast agents. Characterizing the effect of these tools will aid in assessing white matter myelin content and microstructure. METHODS: Image data from six gadolinium-perfused mouse brain specimens were acquired at 2.0, 7.0, and 9.4 Tesla. Magnetic susceptibility contrast was analyzed for its dependence on field strength, gadolinium concentration, and white matter fiber orientation. A model for this contrast is presented based on the three-pool model for white matter. RESULTS: The specimen data illustrate that white-gray matter susceptibility contrast is field strength independent. White-gray matter contrast improves significantly as a function of gadolinium contrast agent in the tissue, i.e., white matter appears increasingly more diamagnetic relative to gray matter. The simulated data from the model suggest that susceptibility anisotropy of white matter fiber bundles increases nonlinearly as a function of gadolinium concentration due to contrast agent compartmentalization into the extracellular white matter water pool. CONCLUSION: Using contrast agents in MR histology facilitates white-gray matter susceptibility contrast modulation and the probing of white matter microstructure and orientation.
Authors: E Mark Haacke; Norman Y C Cheng; Michael J House; Qiang Liu; Jaladhar Neelavalli; Robert J Ogg; Asadullah Khan; Muhammad Ayaz; Wolff Kirsch; Andre Obenaus Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2005-01 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Hunter R Underhill; Robert C Rostomily; Andrei M Mikheev; Chun Yuan; Vasily L Yarnykh Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Bing Yao; Tie-Qiang Li; Peter van Gelderen; Karin Shmueli; Jacco A de Zwart; Jeff H Duyn Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2008-11-05 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Wei Cao; Wei Li; Hui Han; Shonagh K O'Leary-Moore; Kathleen K Sulik; G Allan Johnson; Chunlei Liu Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Hongjiang Wei; Luke Xie; Russell Dibb; Wei Li; Kyle Decker; Yuyao Zhang; G Allan Johnson; Chunlei Liu Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-05-12 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Hongjiang Wei; Peng Cao; Antje Bischof; Roland G Henry; Peder E Z Larson; Chunlei Liu Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Luke Xie; Anita T Layton; Nian Wang; Peder E Z Larson; Jeff L Zhang; Vivian S Lee; Chunlei Liu; G Allan Johnson Journal: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol Date: 2015-10-07