| Literature DB >> 24440429 |
Charlotte I S Barker1, Eva Germovsek2, Rollo L Hoare3, Jodi M Lestner4, Joanna Lewis3, Joseph F Standing5.
Abstract
Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) modelling is used to describe and quantify dose-concentration-effect relationships. Within paediatric studies in infectious diseases and immunology these methods are often applied to developing guidance on appropriate dosing. In this paper, an introduction to the field of PKPD modelling is given, followed by a review of the PKPD studies that have been undertaken in paediatric infectious diseases and immunology. The main focus is on identifying the methodological approaches used to define the PKPD relationship in these studies. The major findings were that most studies of infectious diseases have developed a PK model and then used simulations to define a dose recommendation based on a pre-defined PD target, which may have been defined in adults or in vitro. For immunological studies much of the modelling has focused on either PK or PD, and since multiple drugs are usually used, delineating the relative contributions of each is challenging. The use of dynamical modelling of in vitro antibacterial studies, and paediatric HIV mechanistic PD models linked with the PK of all drugs, are emerging methods that should enhance PKPD-based recommendations in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Antibacterial; Antifungal; Antimicrobial; Antiviral (and antiretrovirals); HIV viral and T-cell dynamics; Immune reconstitution; Non-linear mixed effects (NLME); Paediatrics; Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PKPD)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24440429 PMCID: PMC4076844 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.01.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Drug Deliv Rev ISSN: 0169-409X Impact factor: 15.470
PKPD indices for major classes of antibacterial agents.
| Pharmacodynamics | Class of antibacterial | Specific drug (where applicable) | PD parameter | PD target of therapy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time-dependent | Beta-lactams | – | %T>MIC | Max %T in the dosing interval > MIC |
| Macrolides | Conventional macrolides | %T>MIC | Max %T in the dosing interval > MIC | |
| Azithromycin | AUC/MIC | Optimal daily amount | ||
| Glycopeptides | – | AUC/MIC | Optimal daily amount | |
| Tetracyclines | – | AUC/MIC | Optimal daily amount | |
| Oxazolidinones | Conventional oxazolidinones | %T>MIC | Max %T in the dosing interval > MIC | |
| Linezolid | AUC/MIC | Optimal daily amount | ||
| Concentration-dependent | Aminoglycosides | – | Cmax/MIC or AUC/MIC | Max peak concentration or optimal daily amount |
| (Fluoro)quinolones | – | Cmax/MIC or AUC/MIC | Max peak concentration or optimal daily amount | |
| Metronidazole | – | Cmax/MIC or AUC/MIC | Max peak concentration or optimal daily amount |
Fig. 1Relationship found by Moore et al. relating clinical response to Cmax:MIC ratio of aminoglycosides in a meta-analysis of adult studies [10].
Fig. 2Model for HIV-T-cell dynamics model proposed by Perelson et al. [156]. The numbers of uninfected CD4+ T-cells were assumed to remain constant throughout (grey box). Outlined boxes indicate quantities modelled by differential equations; solid arrows represent first-order rate constants, and the dashed arrow indicates the effect of viral load on the infection rate. Before ART, all new virions produced are infectious. T-cells are infected at a rate proportional to the number of infectious virions, kV, die at rate δ and produce new virus at rate Nδ (i.e. N new virions per cell death). Virus is cleared at rate c. On ART, all newly produced virions are non-infectious. As infectious virus is cleared the T-cell infection rate decreases, numbers of infected T-cells fall and fewer new HIV particles are produced. The reducing viral production rate combines with constant clearance to give a falling viral load. Joint models of viral and T-cell dynamics have usually allowed for T-cell reconstitution by adding a differential equation for uninfected cells, T, with a constant zero-order input representing T-cell production [164,166].
A summary of the mechanisms of action of drugs used for conditioning and prophylaxis in HSCT patients, with references to paediatric PK studies.
| Drug type | Type | Mode of action | PK Studies |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fludarabine | Purine analogue | Interferes with ribonucleotide reductase and DNA polymerase, preventing DNA synthesis. | Plunket et al. |
| Cyclophosphamide | Nitrogen mustard alkylating agent | Attaches alkyl group to guanine bases in DNA, thus inducing cell apoptosis. Attacks resting and dividing cells. | Tasso et al. |
| Melphalan | Nitrogen mustard alkylating agent | Attaches alkyl group to guanine bases in DNA, thus inducing cell apoptosis. Attacks resting and dividing cells. | Van Hasselt et al. |
| Busulphan | Alkylating anti-neoplastic agent | Alkylation causes adenine–guanine cross-links, causing cell apoptosis. Attacks resting and dividing cells. | Van Hasselt et al. |
| Treosulphan | Alkylating anti-neoplastic agent | Alkylation causes adenine–guanine cross-links, causing cell apoptosis. Attacks resting and dividing cells. Less toxicity than with busulphan therapy. | Główka et al. |
| Alemtuzumab | Monoclonal antibody | Binds to CD54, a protein found on the surface of mature lymphocytes but not on haematopoietic stem cells. | Elter et al. |
| Anti-thymocyte globulin | Polyclonal antibody | Rabbit derived antibodies against human T-cells, formed by injecting human lymphatic cells into a rabbit and harvesting the antibodies produced. | Call et al. |
| Cyclosporin | Immuno-suppressant | Lowers immune response and activity of T-cells. Binds to lymphocyte cyclophilin, and the resulting complex inhibits calcineurin, preventing transcription of IL-2. | Willemze et al. |
| Methotrexate | Antimetabolite | Inhibits metabolism of folic acid, thereby inhibiting purine base synthesis. Mainly inhibits rapidly proliferating cells. | Van Hasselt et al. |
| Mycophenolate | Immuno-suppressant | Inhibits inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, the enzyme controlling the rate of synthesis of guanine monophosphate in purine base synthesis in proliferating B- and T-cells. | Downing et al. |