Literature DB >> 24438911

The efficacy of the cycles approach: a multiple baseline design.

Johanna M Rudolph1, Oliver Wendt2.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the Cycles Phonological Remediation Approach as an intervention for children with speech sound disorders (SSD). A multiple baseline design across behaviors was used to examine intervention effects. Three children (ages 4;3 to 5;3) with moderate-severe to severe SSDs participated in two cycles of therapy. Three phonological patterns were targeted for each child. Generalization probes were administered during baseline, intervention, and follow-up phases to assess generalization and maintenance of learned skills. Two of the three participants exhibited statistically and clinically significant gains by the end of the intervention phase and these effects were maintained at follow-up. The third participant exhibited significant gains at follow-up. Phonologically known target patterns showed greater generalization than unknown target patterns across all phases. Individual differences in performance were examined at the participant level and the target pattern level. LEARNING OUTCOMES: The reader will be able to: (1) enumerate the three major components of the cycles approach, (2) describe factors that should be considered when selecting treatment targets, and (3) identify variables that may affect a child's outcome following cycles treatment.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Children; Cycles approach; Phonological intervention; Speech sound disorder

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24438911      PMCID: PMC3959577          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2013.12.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  15 in total

1.  Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.

Authors:  D M Baer; M M Wolf; T R Risley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1968

2.  [Comparative analyses of the effectiveness of three different phonological therapy models].

Authors:  Helena Bolli Mota; Márcia Keske-Soares; Tatiana Bagetti; Marizete Ilha Ceron; Maria das Graças de C Melo Filha
Journal:  Pro Fono       Date:  2007 Jan-Apr

3.  Effectiveness of speech intervention for phonological disorders: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  D Almost; P Rosenbaum
Journal:  Dev Med Child Neurol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.449

Review 4.  Statistical, practical, clinical, and personal significance: definitions and applications in speech-language pathology.

Authors:  Anne K Bothe; Jessica D Richardson
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Clinical assessment of oropharyngeal motor development in young children.

Authors:  J Robbins; T Klee
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1987-08

6.  Generalization following the remediation of early- and later-developing consonant clusters.

Authors:  T W Powell; M Elbert
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1984-05

7.  On the relationship between phonology and learning.

Authors:  D A Dinnsen; M Elbert
Journal:  ASHA Monogr       Date:  1984-05

8.  Phonological disorders III: a procedure for assessing severity of involvement.

Authors:  L D Shriberg; J Kwiatkowski
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1982-08

9.  Effect of phonemic perception training on the speech production and phonological awareness skills of children with expressive phonological delay.

Authors:  Susan Rvachew; Michele Nowak; Genevieve Cloutier
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  Phonological evaluation and remediation of speech deviations of a child with a repaired cleft palate: a case study.

Authors:  B W Hodson; L Chin; B Redmond; R Simpson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1983-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.