Literature DB >> 24436445

Meta-analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.

Qiao Hu1, Xiao Yan Wang2, Shang Yong Zhu3, Li Ke Kang1, Yan Ju Xiao1, Hong Yu Zheng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a non-invasive method for the assessment of breast lesions. The accuracy of CEUS in diagnosing of breast cancer has never been systematically assessed.
PURPOSE: To determine the overall performance of CEUS in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using meta-analysis.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and article references published before October 2012 were searched. Published studies that used histopathologic results as golden reference to assess the diagnostic performance of CEUS in patients suspected of having breast cancer and the data necessary to calculate the diagnostic results were included. The qualities of eligible studies for final meta-analysis were assessed by using the quality assessment of diagnostic studies (QUADAS) instrument. Sensitivity, specificity, summary receiver-operating characteristic (sROC) curves, and area under the curve were calculated to examine the diagnostic performance of CEUS.
RESULTS: Of 16 eligible studies, 957 breast lesions were included in the original meta-analysis, among which heterogeneity arising from factors other than threshold effect was explored. Meta-regression analysis confirmed the contrast agent was the most significant factor cause of heterogeneity (P = 0.0012, relative diagnostic odds ratio [DOR] = 7.06). The use of perfluoro containing microbubbles (Sonovue or Optison) significantly increased the diagnostic precision compared with Levovist. The pooled weighted estimates of sensitivity and specificity for CEUS in the diagnosis of breast lesions were 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83, 0.89) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.75, 0.83), respectively.
CONCLUSION: CEUS has good sensitivity and specificity in the characterization of breast lesions and can potentially help to select suspicious breast mass for surgery. © The Foundation Acta Radiologica 2014 Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; breast cancer; diagnostic performance; heterogeneity; publication bias; subgroup analysis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24436445     DOI: 10.1177/0284185113517115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Radiol        ISSN: 0284-1851            Impact factor:   1.990


  11 in total

1.  Role of multi-mode ultrasound in the diagnosis of level 4 BI-RADS breast lesions and Logistic regression model.

Authors:  Xiaoling Leng; Guofu Huang; Lanhui Yao; Fucheng Ma
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-09-15

2.  Diagnosis of sub-centimetre breast lesions: combining BI-RADS-US with strain elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound-a preliminary study in China.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Xiao; Qiongchao Jiang; Huan Wu; Xiaofeng Guan; Wei Qin; Baoming Luo
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Drug delivery systems, CNS protection, and the blood brain barrier.

Authors:  Ravi Kant Upadhyay
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-07-20       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Time-intensity-curve Analysis and Tumor Extravasation of Nanobubble Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Hanping Wu; Eric C Abenojar; Reshani Perera; Al Christopher De Leon; Tianzhi An; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Quantitative correlational study of microbubble-enhanced ultrasound imaging and magnetic resonance imaging of glioma and early response to radiotherapy in a rat model.

Authors:  Chen Yang; Dong-Hoon Lee; Antonella Mangraviti; Lin Su; Kai Zhang; Yin Zhang; Bin Zhang; Wenxiao Li; Betty Tyler; John Wong; Ken Kang-Hsin Wang; Esteban Velarde; Jinyuan Zhou; Kai Ding
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Characteristics of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and strain elastography of locally advanced breast cancer.

Authors:  Li-Shuang Gu; Rui Zhang; Yong Wang; Xue-Mei Liu; Fei Ma; Jia-Yu Wang; Xiao-Ying Sun; Meng-Jia Liu; Bo Wang; Shuang-Mei Zou
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 7.  Potential role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the differentiation of malignant and benign gallbladder lesions in East Asia: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Yuan Cheng; Manni Wang; Buyun Ma; Xuelei Ma
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  A multicenter study of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound diagnostic classification of breast lesions.

Authors:  Lina Tang; Yijie Chen; Zhongshi Du; Zhaoming Zhong; Qin Chen; Lichun Yang; Ruoxia Shen; Yan Cheng; Zizhen Zhang; Ehui Han; Zhihong Lv; Lijun Yuan; Yong Yang; Yinrong Cheng; Lei Yang; Shengli Wang; Baoyan Bai; Jun Luo
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Does contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) play a better role in diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification? A comparison with MRI.

Authors:  Jiamin Pan; Wenjuan Tong; Jia Luo; Jinyu Liang; Fushun Pan; Yanling Zheng; Xiaoyan Xie
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 10.  Advances in managing breast cancer: a clinical update.

Authors:  Ayca Gucalp; Gaorav P Gupta; Melissa L Pilewskie; Elizabeth J Sutton; Larry Norton
Journal:  F1000Prime Rep       Date:  2014-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.