Literature DB >> 15530957

A cost-effectiveness comparison of bimatoprost versus latanoprost in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Gail F Schwartz, Gregory Reardon.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15530957     DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2004.08.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0039-6257            Impact factor:   6.048


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Bimatoprost 0.01% vs bimatoprost 0.03%: a 12-month prospective trial of clinical and in vivo confocal microscopy in glaucoma patients.

Authors:  M Figus; M Nardi; P Piaggi; M Sartini; G Guidi; L Martini; S Lazzeri
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Bimatoprost: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Greg L Plosker; Susan J Keam
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.