Literature DB >> 11280366

The radiographic assessment of implant patients: decision-making criteria.

K Dula1, R Mini, P F van der Stelt, D Buser.   

Abstract

Indications for the most frequently used imaging modalities in implant dentistry are proposed based on clinical need and biologic risk for the patient. To calculate the biologic risk, the authors carried out dose measurements. They demonstrated that the risk from a periapical radiograph is 20% of that from a panoramic radiograph. A panoramic radiograph and a series of 4 conventional tomographs of a single-tooth gap in the molar region carry 5% and 13% of the risk from computed tomography of the maxilla, respectively. Panoramic radiography is considered the standard radiographic examination for treatment planning of implant patients, because it imparts a low dose while giving the best radiographic survey. Periapical radiographs are used to elucidate details or to complete the findings obtained from the panoramic radiograph. Other radiographic methods, such as conventional film tomography or computed tomography, are applied only in special circumstances, film tomography being preferred for smaller regions of interest and computed tomography being justified for the complete maxilla or mandible when methods for dose reduction are followed. During follow-up, intraoral radiography is considered the standard radiographic examination, particularly for implants in the anterior region of the maxilla or for scientific studies. In patients requiring more than 5 periapical images, panoramic radiography is preferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11280366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  13 in total

1.  Magnification rate of digital panoramic radiographs and its effectiveness for pre-operative assessment of dental implants.

Authors:  Y-K Kim; J-Y Park; S-G Kim; J-S Kim; J-D Kim
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Accuracy of vertical height measurements on direct digital panoramic radiographs using posterior mandibular implants and metal balls as reference objects.

Authors:  L Vazquez; Y Nizamaldin; C Combescure; R Nedir; M Bischof; D M Dohan Ehrenfest; J-P Carrel; U C Belser
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Comparison of implant stability before prosthetic loading of two dental implant systems.

Authors:  Sanjay Balaji Lagdive; Sushma Sanjay Lagdive
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2013-01-06

4.  Panoramic prediction equations to estimate implant- to-mandibular canal dimensions in the mandibular posterior region: implications for dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Annika Bertram; Alexander W Eckert; Andreas Kolk; Rüdiger Emshoff
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.151

5.  Guided implant surgery with modification of the technique involving the raising of a semicircular miniflap: a preliminary study.

Authors:  María Peñarrocha; José Viña; Laura Maestre; David Peñarrocha; José Balaguer
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2012-09-01

6.  Assessment of the increased calcification of the jaw bone with CT-Scan after dental implant placement.

Authors:  Barunawaty Yunus
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2011-06-23

7.  Mini-implants in the anchorage armamentarium: new paradigms in the orthodontics.

Authors:  Masaru Yamaguchi; Toshihiro Inami; Ko Ito; Kazutaka Kasai; Yasuhiro Tanimoto
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-06-05

8.  Bone remodeling around dental implants after 1-1.5 years of functional loading: A retrospective analysis of two-stage implants.

Authors:  Poyan Maghsoudi; Dagmar E Slot; Fridus G A van der Weijden
Journal:  Clin Exp Dent Res       Date:  2022-04-15

9.  Comparison of Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Orthopantomography with Direct Ridge Mapping for Pre-Surgical Planning to Place Implants in Cadaveric Mandibles: An Ex-Vivo Study.

Authors:  G S Amarnath; Ullash Kumar; Mohammed Hilal; B C Muddugangadhar; Kopal Anshuraj; C S Shruthi
Journal:  J Int Oral Health       Date:  2015

Review 10.  Choice of diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in periodontics and implantology.

Authors:  Swarna Chakrapani; K Sirisha; Anumadi Srilalitha; Moogala Srinivas
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2013-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.