Literature DB >> 24431748

Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and flexural strength of conventional core materials with nanohybrid composite resin core material an in vitro study.

Narasimha Jayanthi1, V Vinod1.   

Abstract

Several dental materials have been used for core build-up procedures. Most of these materials were not specifically developed for this purpose, but as a consequence of their properties, have found application in core build-up procedures. Improvements in composites and the development of nanocomposites have led to their use as a core build up material due to their superior mechanical properties, optical properties and ease of handling. However it is not clear if they have better mechanical properties than the conventional core build up materials like amalgam, GIC and dual cure composite core build up material. The strength of the core material is very important and this study was undertaken to compare the mechanical properties of materials used for direct core foundations. The differences between the compressive strength and flexural strength of Filtek Z350 nanocomposite with conventional core build up materials like Amalgam, Vitremer GIC and Fluorocore were tested. Cylindrical plexi glass split molds of dimension 6 ± 1 mm [height] x4 ± 1 mm [diameter] were used to fabricate 15 samples of each core material for testing the compressive strength and rectangular plexi glass split molds of dimension 25 ± 1 mm [length] x 2 ± 1 mm[height] x2 ± 1 mm [width] used for fabricating samples for flexural strength. The samples were stored a water bath at 250 °C for 24 h before testing. The samples were tested using a Universal Instron testing machine. The results of the study showed that Fluorocore had the highest compressive strength and flexural strength followed by Filtek Z350 [nanocomposite] Amalgam had the least flexural strength and Vitremer GIC had the least compressive strength. Thus flurocore and nanocomposite are stronger than other core build up materials and hence should be preferred over other conventional core build up materials in extensively damaged teeth.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compressive strength; Core build up; Filtek Z350; Flexural strength; Nanocomposite; Vitremer

Year:  2013        PMID: 24431748      PMCID: PMC3732736          DOI: 10.1007/s13191-012-0236-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc        ISSN: 0972-4052


  37 in total

1.  Mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials.

Authors:  E C Combe; A M Shaglouf; D C Watts; N H Wilson
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions.

Authors:  R E Kovarik; L C Breeding; W F Caughman
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.426

3.  Thermo-hydrolytic stability of core foundation and restorative composites.

Authors:  Mansuang Arksornnukit; Hidekazu Takahashi
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.426

4.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strain and stress distributions in endodontically treated maxillary central incisors restored with different post, core and crown materials.

Authors:  Roberto Sorrentino; Raffaella Aversa; Valeria Ferro; Tommaso Auriemma; Fernando Zarone; Marco Ferrari; Antonio Apicella
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2006-10-30       Impact factor: 5.304

5.  Effect of light-activation methods and water storage on the flexural strength of two composite resins and a compomer.

Authors:  Leonardo Eloy Rodrigues Filho; Luis Antônio dos Santos Burger; Silvia Kenshima; José Roberto de Oliveira Bauer; Igor Studart Medeiros; Antonio Muench
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun

6.  Fracture strengths of three core restorative materials supported with or without a prefabricated split-shank post.

Authors:  B I Cohen; M K Pagnillo; A S Deutsch; B L Musikant
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.426

7.  An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system.

Authors:  G E Sidoli; P A King; D J Setchell
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.426

8.  Strength properties of visible-light-cured resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.

Authors:  R E Kerby; L Knobloch; A Thakur
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.440

9.  In vitro shear strength of bonded amalgam cores with and without pins.

Authors:  C S Lo; P L Millstein; D Nathanson
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 3.426

10.  Cyclic fatigue testing of five endodontic post designs supported by four core materials.

Authors:  B I Cohen; M K Pagnillo; I Newman; B L Musikant; A S Deutsch
Journal:  J Prosthet Dent       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.426

View more
  14 in total

1.  Esterases affect the physical properties of materials used to seal the endodontic space.

Authors:  M Q Marashdeh; S Friedman; C Lévesque; Y Finer
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Flexural Strength of Glass Carbomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement Stored in Different Storage Media over Time.

Authors:  Muhammad Ali Faridi; Abdul Khabeer; Saad Haroon
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 1.927

3.  Immediate and long-term microshear bond strength of resin-based cements to core build-up materials.

Authors:  Fernanda C Lacerda; Waldemir F Vieira-Junior; Paulo E de Lacerda; Cecília P Turssi; Roberta T Basting; Flávia L do Amaral; Fabiana Mg França
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-10-01

4.  Evaluation and comparison of flexural strength of Cention N with resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and composite - An in vitro study.

Authors:  Geeta Hiremath; Priya Horati; Balaram Naik
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2022-06-13

5.  Effect of Dimethyl Sulfoxide on Bond Strength of a Self-Etch Primer and an Etch and Rinse Adhesive to Surface and Deep Dentin.

Authors:  Farahnaz Sharafeddin; Raha Salehi; Negar Feizi
Journal:  J Dent (Shiraz)       Date:  2016-09

6.  Properties of Experimental Dental Composites Containing Antibacterial Silver-Releasing Filler.

Authors:  Robert Stencel; Jacek Kasperski; Wojciech Pakieła; Anna Mertas; Elżbieta Bobela; Izabela Barszczewska-Rybarek; Grzegorz Chladek
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Effect of photo core, LuxaCore, and core max II core building materials on fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored with fiber-reinforced composite posts and ParaPosts.

Authors:  Alireza Izadi; Bijan Heidari; Farnoush Fotovat; Armaghan Shahbazi; Hanif Allahbakhshi; Ghodratollah Roshanaei; Zohre Farhangian; Kioumars Kiani
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2020-08-14

8.  Shear Bond Strength of E. Max Ceramic Restoration to Hydraulic Calcium Silicate Based Cement (Biodentine): An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Kholod Khalil Al-Manei; Asma Ban Owaiwid; Reem AlDhafiri; Khaled Al-Manei; Shahad AlHarran; Reem Alsulaimani
Journal:  Eur Endod J       Date:  2020-12

9.  Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Biodentine, Resin Modified GIC and Hybrid Composite Resin as a Core Material.

Authors:  Dayalan Subash; Krishnamma Shoba; Shibu Aman; Srinivasan Kumar Indu Bharkavi; Vijayan Nimmi; Radhakrishnan Abhilash
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2017-09-01

10.  Effect of different bleaching regimens on the flexural strength of hybrid composite resin.

Authors:  Atiyeh Feiz; Noushmehr Samanian; Amin Davoudi; Hamid Badrian
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.