Dayalan Subash1, Krishnamma Shoba2, Shibu Aman3, Srinivasan Kumar Indu Bharkavi4, Vijayan Nimmi5, Radhakrishnan Abhilash5. 1. Senior Resident, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India. 2. Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India. 4. Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Pathology and Microbiology, Sathyabama University Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Junior Resident, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Government Dental College, Kottayam, Kerala, India.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The restoration of a severely damaged tooth usually needs a post and core as a part of treatment procedure to provide a corono - radicular stabilization. Biodentine is a class of dental material which possess high mechanical properties with excellent biocompatibility and bioactive behaviour. The sealing ability coupled with optimum physical properties could make Biodentine an excellent option as a core material. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the fracture resistance of Biodentine as a core material in comparison with resin modified glass ionomer and composite resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Freshly extracted 30 human permanent maxillary central incisors were selected. After endodontic treatment followed by post space preparation and luting of Glass fibre post (Reforpost, Angelus), the samples were divided in to three groups based on the type of core material. The core build-up used in Group I was Biodentine (Septodont, France), Group II was Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GC, Japan) and Group III was Hybrid Composite Resin (TeEconom plus, Ivoclar vivadent). The specimens were subjected to fracture toughness using Universal testing machine (1474, Zwick/Roell, Germany) and results were compared using One-way analysis of variance with Tukey's Post hoc test. RESULTS: The results showed that there was significant difference between groups in terms of fracture load. Also, composite resin exhibited highest mean fracture load (1039.9 N), whereas teeth restored with Biodentine demonstrated the lowest mean fracture load (176.66 N). Resin modified glass ionomer exhibited intermediate fracture load (612.07 N). The primary mode of failure in Group I and Group II was favourable (100%) while unfavourable fracture was seen in Group III (30%). CONCLUSION: Biodentine, does not satisfy the requirements to be used as an ideal core material. The uses of RMGIC's as a core build-up material should be limited to non-stress bearing areas. Composite resin is still the best core build-up material owing to its high fracture resistance and bonding to tooth.
INTRODUCTION: The restoration of a severely damaged tooth usually needs a post and core as a part of treatment procedure to provide a corono - radicular stabilization. Biodentine is a class of dental material which possess high mechanical properties with excellent biocompatibility and bioactive behaviour. The sealing ability coupled with optimum physical properties could make Biodentine an excellent option as a core material. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine the fracture resistance of Biodentine as a core material in comparison with resin modified glass ionomer and composite resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Freshly extracted 30 human permanent maxillary central incisors were selected. After endodontic treatment followed by post space preparation and luting of Glass fibre post (Reforpost, Angelus), the samples were divided in to three groups based on the type of core material. The core build-up used in Group I was Biodentine (Septodont, France), Group II was Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement (GC, Japan) and Group III was Hybrid Composite Resin (TeEconom plus, Ivoclar vivadent). The specimens were subjected to fracture toughness using Universal testing machine (1474, Zwick/Roell, Germany) and results were compared using One-way analysis of variance with Tukey's Post hoc test. RESULTS: The results showed that there was significant difference between groups in terms of fracture load. Also, composite resin exhibited highest mean fracture load (1039.9 N), whereas teeth restored with Biodentine demonstrated the lowest mean fracture load (176.66 N). Resin modified glass ionomer exhibited intermediate fracture load (612.07 N). The primary mode of failure in Group I and Group II was favourable (100%) while unfavourable fracture was seen in Group III (30%). CONCLUSION: Biodentine, does not satisfy the requirements to be used as an ideal core material. The uses of RMGIC's as a core build-up material should be limited to non-stress bearing areas. Composite resin is still the best core build-up material owing to its high fracture resistance and bonding to tooth.
Entities:
Keywords:
Compressive strength; Corono-radicular stabilization; Post and core
Authors: Isis Andréa Venturini Pola Poiate; Adalberto Bastos de Vasconcellos; Edgard Poiate Junior; Kátia Regina Hostílio Cervantes Dias Journal: Braz Oral Res Date: 2009 Apr-Jun
Authors: Fernanda C Lacerda; Waldemir F Vieira-Junior; Paulo E de Lacerda; Cecília P Turssi; Roberta T Basting; Flávia L do Amaral; Fabiana Mg França Journal: J Clin Exp Dent Date: 2021-10-01
Authors: Sıla Nur Usta; Begüm Cömert-Pak; Eda Karaismailoğlu; Ayhan Eymirli; Derya Deniz-Sungur Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-02-04 Impact factor: 3.390