Luke Wolfenden1, Rebecca Wyse, Elizabeth Campbell, Leah Brennan, Karen J Campbell, Amanda Fletcher, John Wiggers, Jenny Bowman, Todd R Heard. 1. School of Medicine and Public Health (LW, RW, EC, JW, and TRH) and the School of Psychology (AF and JB), University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia; Hunter New England Population Health, Newcastle, Australia (LW, EC, JW, and TRH); Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, Australia (LW, RW, EC, and JW); the School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia (LB); and the Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia (KJC).
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Telephone-based interventions can be effective in increasing child fruit and vegetable intake in the short term (<6 mo). The long-term efficacy of such interventions, however, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether the short-term (<6 mo) impact of a telephone-based intervention on children's fruit and vegetable intake was sustained over a longer term. A secondary aim of the study was to assess the long-term impact of the intervention on the intake of foods high in fat, salt, or sugar (noncore foods). DESIGN: The study used a cluster randomized controlled trial design. Parents were recruited from Australian preschools between February and August 2010 and allocated to receive anintervention consisting of print materials and 4 telephone-counseling calls delivered over 1 mo or to a print information-only control group. The primary endpoint for the trial was the 18-mo postbaseline follow-up. Linear regression models were used to assess between-group differences in child consumption of fruit and vegetables and noncore foods by subscales of the Children's Dietary Questionnaire. RESULTS:Fruit and vegetable subscale scores were significantly higher, indicating greater child fruit and vegetable intake, among children in the intervention group at the 12-mo (16.77 compared with 14.89; P < 0.01) but not the 18-mo (15.98 compared with 16.82; P = 0.14) follow-up. There were no significant differences between groups at either of the follow-up periods in the noncore food subscale score. CONCLUSION: Further research to identify effective maintenance strategies is required to maximize the benefits of telephone-based interventions on child diet.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Telephone-based interventions can be effective in increasing child fruit and vegetable intake in the short term (<6 mo). The long-term efficacy of such interventions, however, is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether the short-term (<6 mo) impact of a telephone-based intervention on children's fruit and vegetable intake was sustained over a longer term. A secondary aim of the study was to assess the long-term impact of the intervention on the intake of foods high in fat, salt, or sugar (noncore foods). DESIGN: The study used a cluster randomized controlled trial design. Parents were recruited from Australian preschools between February and August 2010 and allocated to receive an intervention consisting of print materials and 4 telephone-counseling calls delivered over 1 mo or to a print information-only control group. The primary endpoint for the trial was the 18-mo postbaseline follow-up. Linear regression models were used to assess between-group differences in child consumption of fruit and vegetables and noncore foods by subscales of the Children's Dietary Questionnaire. RESULTS: Fruit and vegetable subscale scores were significantly higher, indicating greater child fruit and vegetable intake, among children in the intervention group at the 12-mo (16.77 compared with 14.89; P < 0.01) but not the 18-mo (15.98 compared with 16.82; P = 0.14) follow-up. There were no significant differences between groups at either of the follow-up periods in the noncore food subscale score. CONCLUSION: Further research to identify effective maintenance strategies is required to maximize the benefits of telephone-based interventions on child diet.
Authors: Karl E Friedl; Sylvia Rowe; Laura L Bellows; Susan L Johnson; Marion M Hetherington; Isabelle de Froidmont-Görtz; Veerle Lammens; Van S Hubbard Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2014-06-25 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Rebecca K Hodder; Kate M O'Brien; Fiona G Stacey; Flora Tzelepis; Rebecca J Wyse; Kate M Bartlem; Rachel Sutherland; Erica L James; Courtney Barnes; Luke Wolfenden Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-11-07
Authors: Sara M St George; Yaray Agosto; Lourdes M Rojas; Mary Soares; Monica Bahamon; Guillermo Prado; Justin D Smith Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 10.867
Authors: Rebecca K Hodder; Fiona G Stacey; Kate M O'Brien; Rebecca J Wyse; Tara Clinton-McHarg; Flora Tzelepis; Erica L James; Kate M Bartlem; Nicole K Nathan; Rachel Sutherland; Emma Robson; Sze Lin Yoong; Luke Wolfenden Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-01-25
Authors: Luke Wolfenden; John Wiggers; Philip Morgan; Lubna Abdul Razak; Jannah Jones; Meghan Finch; Rachel Sutherland; Christophe Lecathelinais; Karen Gillham; Sze Lin Yoong Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-09-02 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rebecca K Hodder; Kate M O'Brien; Fiona G Stacey; Rebecca J Wyse; Tara Clinton-McHarg; Flora Tzelepis; Erica L James; Kate M Bartlem; Nicole K Nathan; Rachel Sutherland; Emma Robson; Sze Lin Yoong; Luke Wolfenden Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-05-17