Literature DB >> 24427793

Intraocular pressure during the early postoperative period after 100 consecutive implantations of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses with a central hole.

Felix Gonzalez-Lopez, Rafael Bilbao-Calabuig, Blas Mompean, Victoria de Rojas, Jorge Luezas, Mohammad Reza Djodeyre, Jaime Beltran.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To study changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) during the early postoperative period in eyes having implantation of a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) (Visian Implantable Collamer Lens V4c).
SETTING: Clínica Baviera, Instituto Oftalmológico Europeo, Madrid, Spain.
DESIGN: Case series.
METHODS: This retrospective review included the first consecutive eyes having implantation of a spherical or toric myopic pIOL with a central hole at Clínica Baviera from December 2011 to June 2012 by the same experienced surgeon. The IOP was evaluated preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively.
RESULTS: The study comprised 100 eyes. The mean IOP changed from 14.6 mm Hg ± 3.4 (SD) (range 8 to 26 mm Hg) preoperatively to 14.5 ± 4.6 mm Hg (range 6 to 30 mm Hg) 1 day postoperatively, 14.2 ± 4.2 mm Hg (range 6 to 29 mm Hg) at 1 week, and 12.3 ± 3.4 mm Hg (range 9 to 24 mm Hg) at 1 month. No statistically significant changes were detected over time postoperatively (P>.2). No perioperative complications associated with the implantation of the pIOL were recorded. No pIOLs were explanted, no toric pIOL rotation was detected, and no pupillary block or acute angle closure was observed.
CONCLUSION: The short-term clinical data for the new pIOL model with the central hole (KS-Aquaport) suggest that it is a safe and effective means for controlling postoperative IOP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24427793     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.06.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  20 in total

1.  [Can the implantable collamer lens with AquaPORT technology safely prevent an angle block? Early experiences in the Homburg/Saar refractive surgery center].

Authors:  T Tsintarakis; T Eppig; A Langenbucher; B Seitz; M El-Husseiny
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  [Intraocular pressure after implantation of an ICL with aquaport : Development of intraocular pressure after implantation of an ICL (model V4c) with aquaport without iridotomy].

Authors:  B Repplinger; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  Analysis of perioperative problems related to intraocular Implantable Collamer Lens (ICL) implantation.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Rui Gong; Xiaolan Zhang; Yingping Deng
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 2.029

4.  The Relationship between Anterior Chamber Angle and Intraocular Pressure Early after V4c Implantable Collamer Lens Implantation.

Authors:  Zongli Hu; Chunlin Chen; Min Sun; Rongdi Yuan; Jian Ye
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 5.  Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens.

Authors:  Mark Packer
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-06-09

6.  Posterior chamber collagen copolymer phakic intraocular lens with a central hole for moderate-to-high myopia: First experience in China.

Authors:  Xinfang Cao; Weiliang Wu; Yang Wang; Chen Xie; Jianping Tong; Ye Shen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

7.  Anterior Chamber Angle Evaluation following Phakic Posterior Chamber Collamer Lens with CentraFLOW and Its Correlation with ICL Vault and Intraocular Pressure.

Authors:  Sherif A Eissa; Sherin H Sadek; Mohamed W A El-Deeb
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Comparison of intraocular pressure andvault after implantation of implantable collamer lens with and without a central hole.

Authors:  Haiting Chen; Guangzeng Niu; Yuxiang Fan; Jingxue Ma
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.209

9.  A comparison of visual outcome and rotational stability of two types of toric implantable collamer lenses (TICL) : V4 versus V4c.

Authors:  Joo Hyun; Dong Hui Lim; Doo Ri Eo; Sungsoon Hwang; Eui-Sang Chung; Tae-Young Chung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison of Implantable Collamer Lens Visian ICL V4 and ICL V4c for high myopia: A cohort study.

Authors:  Ying Tian; Hai-Bo Jiang; Jian Jiang; Dan Wen; Xiao-Bo Xia; Wei-Tao Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.