Literature DB >> 24423863

Lower mitotic activity in BRCA1/2-associated primary breast cancers occurring after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Victorien Mt van Verschuer1, Bernadette Am Heemskerk-Gerritsen2, Carolien Hm van Deurzen3, Inge-Marie Obdeijn4, Madeleine Ma Tilanus-Linthorst1, Cornelis Verhoef1, Marjanka K Schmidt5, Linetta B Koppert1, Maartje J Hooning2, Caroline Seynaeve2.   

Abstract

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is associated with 50% reduction of BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer (BC) risk, possibly through decreased growth activity. In this pilot study, tumor characteristics and growth rates of BRCA1/2-associated primary BCs (PBCs) detected after RRSO were compared with those of PBCs originating without RRSO. From a cohort of 271 women with BRCA1/2-associated screen detected BC, we selected 20 patients with PBC detected ≥12 months after RRSO (RRSO group). Controls were 36 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with PBC detected without RRSO (non-RRSO group) matched for age at diagnosis (± 2.5 y) and for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Pathology samples were revised for histological subtype, tumor differentiation grade, mitotic activity index (MAI), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status. Tumor growth rates, expressed as tumor volume doubling times (DT), were calculated from revised magnetic resonance and mammographic images. Median age at PBC diagnosis was 52 y (range 35-67). PBCs after RRSO had lower MAIs (12 vs. 22 mitotic counts/2 mm, P = 0.02), were smaller (11 vs. 17 mm, P = 0.01), and tend to be PR-positive more often than PBCs without RRSO (38% vs. 13%, P = 0.07). Differentiation grade, ER, and HER2 status were not different. Median DT was 124 d (range 89-193) in the RRSO group and 93 days (range 54-253) in the non-RRSO group (P = 0.47). BC occurring after RRSO in BRCA mutation carriers features a lower MAI, suggesting a less aggressive biological phenotype. When confirmed in larger series, this may have consequences for BC screening protocols after RRSO.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1/2; breast cancer; estrogen; mitotic activity; risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy; tumor characteristics; tumor growth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24423863      PMCID: PMC3979814          DOI: 10.4161/cbt.27628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther        ISSN: 1538-4047            Impact factor:   4.742


  36 in total

1.  Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.

Authors:  A Antoniou; P D P Pharoah; S Narod; H A Risch; J E Eyfjord; J L Hopper; N Loman; H Olsson; O Johannsson; A Borg; B Pasini; P Radice; S Manoukian; D M Eccles; N Tang; E Olah; H Anton-Culver; E Warner; J Lubinski; J Gronwald; B Gorski; H Tulinius; S Thorlacius; H Eerola; H Nevanlinna; K Syrjäkoski; O-P Kallioniemi; D Thompson; C Evans; J Peto; F Lalloo; D G Evans; D F Easton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2003-04-03       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Is Gompertzian or exponential kinetics a valid description of individual human cancer growth?

Authors:  M W Retsky; D E Swartzendruber; R H Wardwell; P D Bame
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.538

3.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Authors:  Noah D Kauff; Jaya M Satagopan; Mark E Robson; Lauren Scheuer; Martee Hensley; Clifford A Hudis; Nathan A Ellis; Jeff Boyd; Patrick I Borgen; Richard R Barakat; Larry Norton; Mercedes Castiel; Khedoudja Nafa; Kenneth Offit
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  Timothy R Rebbeck; Henry T Lynch; Susan L Neuhausen; Steven A Narod; Laura Van't Veer; Judy E Garber; Gareth Evans; Claudine Isaacs; Mary B Daly; Ellen Matloff; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Barbara L Weber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-05-20       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Age-dependent growth rate of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  P G Peer; J A van Dijck; J H Hendriks; R Holland; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1993-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  Mary-Claire King; Joan H Marks; Jessica B Mandell
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-10-24       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

8.  Estrogen receptor status in BRCA1- and BRCA2-related breast cancer: the influence of age, grade, and histological type.

Authors:  William D Foulkes; Kelly Metcalfe; Ping Sun; Wedad M Hanna; Henry T Lynch; Parviz Ghadirian; Nadine Tung; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Barbara L Weber; Jane McLennan; Ivo A Olivotto; Louis R Bégin; Steven A Narod
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Screen-detected breast cancers have a lower mitotic activity index.

Authors:  R P Groenendijk; P Bult; L Tewarie; P G Peer; R F van der Sluis; T J Ruers; T Wobbes
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Tamoxifen and risk of contralateral breast cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Kelly-Anne Phillips; Roger L Milne; Matti A Rookus; Mary B Daly; Antonis C Antoniou; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; Douglas F Easton; Steve Ellis; Michael L Friedlander; Saundra S Buys; Nadine Andrieu; Catherine Noguès; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Valérie Bonadona; Pascal Pujol; Sue Anne McLachlan; Esther M John; Maartje J Hooning; Caroline Seynaeve; Rob A E M Tollenaar; David E Goldgar; Mary Beth Terry; Trinidad Caldes; Prue C Weideman; Irene L Andrulis; Christian F Singer; Kate Birch; Jacques Simard; Melissa C Southey; Håkan L Olsson; Anna Jakubowska; Edith Olah; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Lenka Foretova; John L Hopper
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.

Authors:  George U Eleje; Ahizechukwu C Eke; Ifeanyichukwu U Ezebialu; Joseph I Ikechebelu; Emmanuel O Ugwu; Onyinye O Okonkwo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-08-24

2.  Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, natural menopause, and breast cancer risk: an international prospective cohort of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

Authors:  Nasim Mavaddat; Antonis C Antoniou; Thea M Mooij; Maartje J Hooning; Bernadette A Heemskerk-Gerritsen; Catherine Noguès; Marion Gauthier-Villars; Olivier Caron; Paul Gesta; Pascal Pujol; Alain Lortholary; Daniel Barrowdale; Debra Frost; D Gareth Evans; Louise Izatt; Julian Adlard; Ros Eeles; Carole Brewer; Marc Tischkowitz; Alex Henderson; Jackie Cook; Diana Eccles; Klaartje van Engelen; Marian J E Mourits; Margreet G E M Ausems; Linetta B Koppert; John L Hopper; Esther M John; Wendy K Chung; Irene L Andrulis; Mary B Daly; Saundra S Buys; Javier Benitez; Trinidad Caldes; Anna Jakubowska; Jacques Simard; Christian F Singer; Yen Tan; Edith Olah; Marie Navratilova; Lenka Foretova; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Marie-José Roos-Blom; Flora E Van Leeuwen; Brita Arver; Håkan Olsson; Rita K Schmutzler; Christoph Engel; Karin Kast; Kelly-Anne Phillips; Mary Beth Terry; Roger L Milne; David E Goldgar; Matti A Rookus; Nadine Andrieu; Douglas F Easton
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 6.466

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.