Literature DB >> 10646892

Screen-detected breast cancers have a lower mitotic activity index.

R P Groenendijk1, P Bult, L Tewarie, P G Peer, R F van der Sluis, T J Ruers, T Wobbes.   

Abstract

We know that screening for breast cancer leads to detection of smaller tumours with less lymph node metastases. Could it be possible that the decrease in mortality after screening is not only caused by this earlier stage, but also by a different mitotic activity index (MAI) of the tumours that are detected by screening? Is MAI a prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival? A retrospective study was carried out of 387 patients with breast cancer, treated at the University Hospital Nijmegen between January 1992 and September 1997. Ninety patients had screen-detected breast cancer, 297 patients had breast cancers detected outside the screening programme. The MAI, other prognostic factors and recurrence-free survival were determined. In non-screen-detected tumours the MAI is twice as high as in screen-detected tumours, even after correction for age took place. The MAI correlated well with other tumour characteristics. The MAI in itself is a prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival. Favourable outcome in screen detected breast cancer is not entirely caused by detecting cancer in early stages: quantitative features such as the MAI indicate a less malignant character of screen detected breast cancer. The MAI is an independent prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10646892      PMCID: PMC2363302          DOI: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.0930

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  32 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic screening in older women. Is it worthwhile?

Authors:  J A van Dijck; M J Broeders; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.923

2.  The Multi-Center Morphometric Mammary Carcinoma Project (MMMCP) in The Netherlands: value of morphometrically assessed proliferation and differentiation.

Authors:  J P Baak; P J van Diest; T Benraadt; E Matze-Cok; J Brugghe; L T Schuurmans; J J Littooy
Journal:  J Cell Biochem Suppl       Date:  1993

3.  Nation-wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: results of initial and subsequent screening 1990-1995. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  J Fracheboud; H J de Koning; P M Beemsterboer; R Boer; J H Hendriks; A L Verbeek; B M van Ineveld; A E de Bruyn; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1998-03-02       Impact factor: 7.396

4.  Age-specific sensitivities of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  P G Peer; A L Verbeek; H Straatman; J H Hendriks; R Holland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  'Blind' multicenter evaluation of the prognostic value of DNA image cytometric and morphometric features in invasive breast cancer.

Authors:  F Theissig; J P Baak; L Schuurmans; G Haroske; W Meyer; K D Kunze
Journal:  Anal Cell Pathol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 6.  Breast cancer screening.

Authors:  K M Harris; V G Vogel
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  1997 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 9.264

7.  Breast-cancer mortality in a non-randomized trial on mammographic screening in women over age 65.

Authors:  J A Van Dijck; A L Verbeek; L V Beex; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; H Straatman; J M Werre
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1997-01-17       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Interval carcinomas of the breast: a group with intermediate outcome.

Authors:  A A Schroën; T Wobbes; R F van der Sluis
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 3.454

9.  Standardized mitotic counts in breast cancer. Evaluation of the method.

Authors:  Y U Collan; T Kuopio; J P Baak; R Becker; W V Bogomoletz; M Deverell; P van Diest; C van Galen; K Gilchrist; A Javed; V M Kosma; H Kujari; P Luzi; G M Mariuzzi; E Matze; R Montironi; M Scarpelli; D Sierra; S Sisti; S Toikkanen; P Tosi; W F Whimster; E Wisse
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Predictive value of a morphometric prognostic index in female breast cancer.

Authors:  S Aaltomaa; P Lipponen; M Eskelinen; V M Kosma; S Marin; E Alhava; K Syrjänen
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.935

View more
  11 in total

1.  Copy number imbalances between screen- and symptom-detected breast cancers and impact on disease-free survival.

Authors:  A M Brewster; P Thompson; A A Sahin; K Do; M Edgerton; J L Murray; S Tsavachidis; R Zhou; Y Liu; L Zhang; G Mills; M Bondy
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2011-07-27

2.  Predictive value of tumor proliferative indices in periampullary cancers: Ki-67, mitotic activity index (MI) and volume corrected mitotic index (M/V) using tissue microarrays.

Authors:  Mark M Aloysius; Shivanthi J De Silva Hewavisenthi; Timothy E Bates; Brian J Rowlands; Dileep N Lobo; Abed M Zaitoun
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Katrina Armstrong; Constance D Lehman; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Preoperative selection of symptomatic breast cancer patients appropriate for lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  M Barry; R A Cahill; G Roche-Nagle; R Landers; D Walsh; D J Bouchier-Hayes; R G K Watson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Lower mitotic activity in BRCA1/2-associated primary breast cancers occurring after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

Authors:  Victorien Mt van Verschuer; Bernadette Am Heemskerk-Gerritsen; Carolien Hm van Deurzen; Inge-Marie Obdeijn; Madeleine Ma Tilanus-Linthorst; Cornelis Verhoef; Marjanka K Schmidt; Linetta B Koppert; Maartje J Hooning; Caroline Seynaeve
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.742

Review 6.  Prognostic value of proliferation in invasive breast cancer: a review.

Authors:  P J van Diest; E van der Wall; J P A Baak
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  Long-term prognosis of breast cancer detected by mammography screening or other methods.

Authors:  Tiina Lehtimäki; Mikael Lundin; Nina Linder; Harri Sihto; Kaija Holli; Taina Turpeenniemi-Hujanen; Vesa Kataja; Jorma Isola; Heikki Joensuu; Johan Lundin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Screen-detected vs clinical breast cancer: the advantage in the relative risk of lymph node metastases decreases with increasing tumour size.

Authors:  L Bucchi; A Barchielli; A Ravaioli; M Federico; V De Lisi; S Ferretti; E Paci; M Vettorazzi; S Patriarca; A Frigerio; E Buiatti
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-01-17       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Comparison of patients with small (≤2 cm) breast cancer according to adherence to breast screening program.

Authors:  Jung Min Park; Soong Jun Bae; Changik Yoon; Hye Sun Lee; Hak Woo Lee; Sung Gwe Ahn; Seung Ah Lee; Joon Jeong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Poor Biological Factors and Prognosis of Interval Breast Cancers: Long-Term Results of Bahçeşehir (Istanbul) Breast Cancer Screening Project in Turkey.

Authors:  Neslihan Cabioğlu; Sibel Özkan Gürdal; Arda Kayhan; Nilüfer Özaydın; Cennet Şahin; Ömür Can; Beyza Özçınar; Gönül Aykuter; Gülçin Vatandaş; Erkin Aribal; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.