Literature DB >> 24418665

Competence versus mastery: the time course for developing proficiency in video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Xiao Li1, Jun Wang1, Mark K Ferguson2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Thoracoscopic lobectomy has a vaguely defined learning curve for competency, whereas the development of proficiency has not been evaluated. We compared learning curves for 2 surgeons experienced in open lobectomy to define the learning process for thoracoscopic lobectomy.
METHODS: The first 200 patients who underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy by 1 senior surgeon at 2 different institutions were evaluated. Data were abstracted from prospectively maintained databases. Learning curves were evaluated for operative time, blood loss, and postoperative length of stay by assessing elements of proficiency: efficiency (defined as decreasing values for these variables, assessed by Change-Point Analysis) and consistency (defined as the absence of outliers, evaluated by moving average). Conversion to open rates and complication rates were assessed.
RESULTS: Surgeon A's patients were younger than Surgeon B's patients (57.4 vs 66.0 years; P < .001) and had fewer medical comorbidities. For Surgeons A and B, operation time (mean, 178 vs 180 minutes) efficiency was achieved at 157 and 108 cases, respectively, and blood loss (mean 181 vs 178 mL) efficiency was achieved at 126 and 139 cases, respectively. Conversion to open rates decreased between the first and second halves of the study (P < .001) despite expanding anatomic indications for a video-assisted thoracic surgery approach. Consistency was not reliably achieved for either surgeon for operating time or blood loss. Postoperative length of stay and complication rates did not change for either surgeon.
CONCLUSIONS: The learning curves for video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy were similar for both surgeons. Between 100 and 200 cases are required to achieve efficiency, and consistency requires even more cases.
Copyright © 2014 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24418665     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.11.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  21 in total

1.  Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in the animal model.

Authors:  Mercedes de la Torre; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas; Ricardo Fernández-Prado; María Delgado; Eva M Fieira; Alberto Centeno
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Development and validation of a theoretical test of proficiency for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Mona Meral Savran; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; William Walker; Thomas Schmid; Signe Rolskov Bojsen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Defining the learning curve of robotic thoracic surgery: what does it take?

Authors:  Alexandra D Power; Desmond M D'Souza; Susan D Moffatt-Bruce; Robert E Merritt; Peter J Kneuertz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy: which is the learning curve of an experienced consultant?

Authors:  Antonio Mazzella; Anne Olland; Pierre Emmanuel Falcoz; Stephane Renaud; Nicola Santelmo; Gilbert Massard
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 5.  Robotic lobectomies: when and why?

Authors:  Sara Ricciardi; Giuseppe Cardillo; Carmelina Cristina Zirafa; Federico Davini; Franca Melfi
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-08-21

Review 6.  What happens while learning robotic lobectomy for lung cancer?

Authors:  Mehmet Oğuzhan Özyurtkan; Erkan Kaba; Alper Toker
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2017-03-10

Review 7.  Training in robotic thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Paul L Linsky; Benjamin Wei
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-01-04

8.  Intraoperative conversion from video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy to open thoracotomy: a study of causes and implications.

Authors:  Varun Puri; Aalok Patel; Kaustav Majumder; Jennifer M Bell; Traves D Crabtree; A Sasha Krupnick; Daniel Kreisel; Stephen R Broderick; G Alexander Patterson; Bryan F Meyers
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-09-17       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Using virtual reality simulation to assess competence in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy.

Authors:  Katrine Jensen; Flemming Bjerrum; Henrik Jessen Hansen; René Horsleben Petersen; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Lars Konge
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Conversion during thoracoscopic lobectomy: related factors and learning curve impact.

Authors:  David E Smith; Agustin Dietrich; Matias Nicolas; Alejandro Da Lozzo; Enrique Beveraggi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2015-11-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.