Literature DB >> 29078672

Robotic lobectomies: when and why?

Sara Ricciardi1, Giuseppe Cardillo2, Carmelina Cristina Zirafa1, Federico Davini1, Franca Melfi3.   

Abstract

During the last decade, an abundance of papers has supported minimally invasive pulmonary resections (MIPR) vs. traditional open approach. Both video assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) and robotic thoracic surgery have shown better perioperative outcomes and equivalent oncologic results compared with thoracotomy, confirming the effectiveness of the MIPR. Despite the profound changes and improvements that have taken place throughout the years and the increasing use of robotic system worldwide, the controversy about the application of robotic surgery for lung resections is still open. Some authors wonder about the advantages of using a more expensive and more complex platform for thoracic surgery instead of the more established VATS technique. Robotic thoracic surgery represents, although the cumulative experience worldwide is still limited and evolving, a significant evolution over VATS, nonetheless several authors criticize the longer operative time and the high costs of robotic procedures. The aim of this paper is to answer two relevant questions: why and when the application of robotic technology in thoracic surgery is appropriate?

Keywords:  Minimally invasive; lobectomy; lung cancer; robotic

Year:  2017        PMID: 29078672      PMCID: PMC5637957          DOI: 10.21037/jovs.2017.07.09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Surg        ISSN: 2221-2965


  44 in total

1.  Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy.

Authors:  Bernard J Park; Raja M Flores
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  A successful case of robotic bronchoplastic lobectomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshige Nakamura; Yuji Taniguchi; Ken Miwa; Shinji Fujioka; Yuki Matsuoka; Yasuaki Kubouchi
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 1.520

3.  Robotic lobectomy for lung cancer: evolution in technique and technology.

Authors:  Franca M A Melfi; Olivia Fanucchi; Federico Davini; Gaetano Romano; Marco Lucchi; Paolo Dini; Marcello C Ambrogi; Alfredo Mussi
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-03-09       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Video-assisted thoracic surgical non-rib spreading simultaneously stapled lobectomy: a more patient-friendly oncologic resection.

Authors:  R J Lewis; R J Caccavale; J P Bocage; M D Widmann
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Evaluation of acute and chronic pain outcomes after robotic, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, or open anatomic pulmonary resection.

Authors:  Sebastian T Kwon; Lili Zhao; Rishindra M Reddy; Andrew C Chang; Mark B Orringer; Chad M Brummett; Jules Lin
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Minimally invasive (robotic assisted thoracic surgery and video-assisted thoracic surgery) lobectomy for the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Bernard J Park; Hao-Xian Yang; Kaitlin M Woo; Camelia S Sima
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Farid Gharagozloo; Marc Margolis; Barbara Tempesta; Eric Strother; Farzad Najam
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Lymph node evaluation achieved by open lobectomy compared with thoracoscopic lobectomy for N0 lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert E Merritt; Chuong D Hoang; Joseph B Shrager
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-31       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Report on First International Workshop on Robotic Surgery in Thoracic Oncology.

Authors:  Giulia Veronesi; Robert Cerfolio; Roberto Cingolani; Jens C Rueckert; Luc Soler; Alper Toker; Umberto Cariboni; Edoardo Bottoni; Uberto Fumagalli; Franca Melfi; Carlo Milli; Pierluigi Novellis; Emanuele Voulaz; Marco Alloisio
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  Robotic surgery for lung cancer.

Authors:  Marcello C Ambrogi; Olivia Fanucchi; Franco Melfi; Alfredo Mussi
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-06-05
View more
  5 in total

1.  RATS: a word is enough to the wise.

Authors:  Daniel Valdivia; Khaled Mardanzai; Clemens Aigner
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  From "open" to robotic assisted thoracic surgery: why RATS and not VATS?

Authors:  Sara Ricciardi; Federico Davini; Carmelina Cristina Zirafa; Franca Melfi
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-22

3.  Quality assessment of robot assisted thoracic surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer: nodal upstaging and mediastinal recurrence.

Authors:  Ghada M Shahin; Besir Topal; Sjaak Pouwels; Thanasie L Markou; Rody Boon; Jos A Stigt
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Treatment of pulmonary nodule: from VATS to RATS.

Authors:  Federico Davini; Sara Ricciardi; Carmelina Cristina Zirafa; Ilenia Cavaliere; Gaetano Romano; Franca Melfi
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-02-12

Review 5.  [Advances in Surgical Approach and Resection of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Authors:  Huansong Yang; Juwei Mu
Journal:  Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi       Date:  2018-09-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.