Literature DB >> 24417327

Trial-to-trial fluctuations in attentional state and their relation to intelligence.

Nash Unsworth1, Brittany D McMillan1.   

Abstract

Trial-to-trial fluctuations in attentional state while performing measures of intelligence were examined in the current study. Participants performed various measures of fluid and crystallized intelligence while also providing attentional state ratings prior to each trial. It was found that pre-trial attentional state ratings strongly predicted subsequent trial performance on the fluid intelligence measures, such that when participants rated their current attentional state as highly focused on the current task, performance tended to be high compared to when participants reported their current attentional state as being low and unfocused on the current task. Furthermore, overall attentional state ratings and variability in attentional state ratings were moderately correlated with overall levels of performance on the fluid intelligence measures. However, attentional state ratings did not predict performance on the measure of crystallized intelligence. These results suggest a strong link between variation in attention state and variation in fluid intelligence as postulated by a number of recent theories. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24417327     DOI: 10.1037/a0035544

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  10 in total

1.  Contralateral Delay Activity Tracks Fluctuations in Working Memory Performance.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Matthew K Robison; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Attentional fluctuations in preschoolers: Direct and indirect relations with task accuracy, academic readiness, and school performance.

Authors:  Elif Isbell; Susan D Calkins; Margaret M Swingler; Esther M Leerkes
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2018-03

3.  Tuning in by tuning out distractions.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Working memory capacity and intra-individual variability of proactive control.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Wiemers; Thomas S Redick
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2017-11-08

5.  Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.

Authors:  Kirsten C S Adam; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Tracking attentional states: Assessing the relationship between sustained and selective focused attention in visual working memory.

Authors:  Andra Arnicane; Alessandra S Souza
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Pupillary correlates of lapses of sustained attention.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  The influence of lapses of attention on working memory capacity.

Authors:  Nash Unsworth; Matthew K Robison
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

9.  Restoration of Attention by Rest in a Multitasking World: Theory, Methodology, and Empirical Evidence.

Authors:  Frank Schumann; Michael B Steinborn; Jens Kürten; Liyu Cao; Barbara Friederike Händel; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-01

10.  The Association of Number and Space Under Different Tasks: Insight From a Process Perspective.

Authors:  Zhijun Deng; Yinghe Chen; Meng Zhang; Yanjun Li; Xiaoshuang Zhu
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-12
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.