Literature DB >> 24416479

Tibial Inlay Press-fit Fixation Versus Interference Screw in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Max Ettinger1, Sarah Büermann1, Tilman Calliess1, Mohamed Omar2, Christian Krettek2, Christof Hurschler3, Michael Jagodzinski2, Maximilian Petri2.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) by a tibial press-fit fixation of the patellar tendon with an accessory bone plug is a promising approach because no foreign materials are required. Until today, there is no data about the biomechanical properties of such press-fit fixations. The aim of this study was to compare the biomechanical qualities of a bone plug tibial inlay technique with the commonly applied interference screw of patellar tendon PCL grafts. Twenty patellar tendons including a bone block were harvested from ten human cadavers. The grafts were implanted into twenty legs of adult German country pigs. In group P, the grafts were attached in a press-fit technique with accessory bone plug. In group S, the grafts were fixed with an interference screw. Each group consisted of 10 specimens. The constructs were biomechanically analyzed in cyclic loading between 60 and 250 N for 500 cycles recording elongation. Finally, ultimate failure load and failure mode were analyzed. Ultimate failure load was 598.6±36.3 N in group P and 653.7±39.8 N in group S (not significant, P>0.05). Elongation during cyclic loading between the 1(st) and the 20(th) cycle was 3.4±0.9 mm for group P and 3.1±1 mm for group S. Between the 20(th) and the 500(th) cycle, elongation was 4.2±2.3 mm in group P and 2.5±0.9 mm in group S (not significant, P>0.05). This is the first study investigating the biomechanical properties of tibial press-fit fixation of the patellar tendon with accessory bone plug in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The implant-free tibial inlay technique shows equal biomechanical characteristics compared to an interference screw fixation. Further in vivo studies are desirable to compare the biological behavior and clinical relevance of this fixation device.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanical properties; interference screw; posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; tibial press-fit fixation

Year:  2013        PMID: 24416479      PMCID: PMC3883076          DOI: 10.4081/or.2013.e35

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)        ISSN: 2035-8164


  27 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnosis and therapy of fresh and chronic posterior cruciate ligament lesions].

Authors:  M J Strobel; A Weiler; H J Eichhorn
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods.

Authors:  Keith L Markolf; Jason R Zemanovic; David R McAllister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Revision posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a modified tibial-inlay double-bundle technique.

Authors:  Sang Hak Lee; Young Bok Jung; Han-Jun Lee; Ho-Joong Jung; Seong Hwan Kim
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Transtibial versus inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an evidence-based systematic review.

Authors:  Jedediah H May; Blake P Gillette; Joseph A Morgan; Aaron J Krych; Michael J Stuart; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 5.  The science of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  C B Frank; D W Jackson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  All-epiphyseal semitendinosus PCL reconstruction in a 10-year-old child.

Authors:  Winston J Warme; Dayne Mickelson
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.324

7.  Posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction.

Authors:  E E Berg
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 8.  Interventions for treating posterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee in adults.

Authors:  M S Peccin; G J M Almeida; J Amaro; M Cohen; B G O Soares; A N Atallah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2005-04-18

9.  Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel E Cooper; Donna Stewart
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Long-term followup of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee.

Authors:  M D Boynton; B R Tietjens
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

View more
  2 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [The killer turn in the posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: mechanism and improvement].

Authors:  Yipeng Lin; Wufeng Cai; Xihao Huang; Jian Li; Qi Li
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-06-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.