Literature DB >> 28138919

CORR Insights®: No Clinically Important Difference in Knee Scores or Instability Between Transtibial and Inlay Techniques for PCL Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Freddie H Fu1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 28138919      PMCID： PMC5339151          DOI： 10.1007/s11999-016-5206-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN： 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


× No keyword cloud information.
  14 in total

1.  A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: graft pretension and knee laxity.

Authors:  David R McAllister; Keith L Markolf; Daniel A Oakes; Charles R Young; Justin McWilliams
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 2.  Double bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: surgical technique and results.

Authors:  Gregory C Fanelli; John D Beck; Craig J Edson
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Comparison of tibial graft fixation between simulated arthroscopic and open inlay techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  R Brick Campbell; Alec Torrie; Aaron Hecker; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Restoring Nature Through Individualized Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery.

Authors:  Amir Ata Rahnemai-Azar; Soheil Sabzevari; Sebastián Irarrázaval; Tom Chao; Freddie H Fu
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2016-10

Review 5.  Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a changing paradigm.

Authors:  Freddie H Fu; Carola F van Eck; Scott Tashman; James J Irrgang; Morey S Moreland
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Tibial Inlay Press-fit Fixation Versus Interference Screw in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Max Ettinger; Sarah Büermann; Tilman Calliess; Mohamed Omar; Christian Krettek; Christof Hurschler; Michael Jagodzinski; Maximilian Petri
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-11-06

7.  Kinematic analysis of the posterior cruciate ligament, part 2: a comparison of anatomic single- versus double-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Coen A Wijdicks; Nicholas I Kennedy; Mary T Goldsmith; Brian M Devitt; Max P Michalski; Asbjørn Årøen; Lars Engebretsen; Robert F LaPrade
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up.

Authors:  Daniel E Cooper; Donna Stewart
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.202

9.  Comparison of single-bundle and double-bundle isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with allograft: a prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Yongqian Li; Jia Li; Jianzhao Wang; Shijun Gao; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 4.772

10.  Evaluation of the clinical results of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction -a comparison between the use of the bone tendon bone and semitendinosus and gracilis tendons-.

Authors:  Yuichiro Maruyama; Katsuo Shitoto; Tomonori Baba; Kazuo Kaneko
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol       Date:  2012-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.