Literature DB >> 11940609

Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods.

Keith L Markolf1, Jason R Zemanovic, David R McAllister.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The optimal method of replacement of the posterior cruciate ligament with a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft is not known. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical responses to cyclic loading tests of bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft replacements fixed to the tibia with one of two methods: a tibial tunnel or a tibial inlay technique.
METHODS: The proximal ends of sixty-two posterior cruciate graft replacements, thirty-one fixed with the tibial tunnel technique and thirty-one fixed with the tibial inlay technique in cadaver knees, were subjected to 2000 cycles of tensile force of 50 to 300 N with the angle of pull at 45 to the tibial plateau. The central 10 mm of the medial and lateral halves of previously fresh-frozen bone-patellar tendon-bone preparations from cadaver knees were used as the grafts. Two pairs of tibiae were used for testing; the two types of fixation and the medial and lateral halves of the patellar tendons were distributed between the tibial pairs. Graft thickness was measured at the point of highest anticipated tissue deformation and at two additional locations at distances from these points. The total change in graft length after cyclic loading at an applied force level of 200 N was recorded. Elongation of the graft during loading cycles between 20 and 200 N of applied tensile force was also measured. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare all measurements between the inlay and tunnel techniques, and between the medial and lateral halves of the graft used for the inlay method.
RESULTS: Ten of the thirty-one grafts that had been passed through a tibial tunnel failed at the acute angle before 2000 cycles of testing could be completed; all thirty-one grafts that had been fixed to the tibia with use of the inlay method survived the testing intact. Evaluation of the twenty-one graft pairs that survived testing after both fixation techniques revealed that the grafts that had been fixed with the inlay method had significantly less thinning at all three measurement sites at the completion of testing; the mean reduction of thickness was 40.6% (at the acute angle) in the grafts fixed with the tunnel method and 12.5% (adjacent to the bone block) in those fixed with the inlay method. After 2000 cycles, the mean lengths of the grafts fixed with the inlay and tunnel methods increased 5.9 and 9.8 mm, respectively; 38% of this increase occurred during the first six loading cycles. After both methods of fixation, the mean graft elongation during a loading cycle decreased approximately 50% from cycle 1 to cycle 2000, resulting in an effectively stiffer graft construct. There was no significant difference in any measured parameter between medial and lateral graft halves.
CONCLUSIONS: These tests showed that the inlay technique of posterior cruciate ligament replacement was superior to the tunnel technique with respect to graft failure, graft thinning, and permanent increase in graft length.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11940609     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200204000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  28 in total

Review 1.  Basic principles for surgical reconstruction of the PCL in chronic posterior knee instability.

Authors:  Pascal Christel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-09-11       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Cryopreservation with glycerol improves the in vitro biomechanical characteristics of human patellar tendon allografts.

Authors:  Lovro Suhodolčan; Miha Brojan; Franc Kosel; Matej Drobnič; Armin Alibegović; Janez Brecelj
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using cyclic loading tests.

Authors:  Yasuharu Hiraga; Yasuyuki Ishibashi; Eiichi Tsuda; Harehiko Tsukada Satoshi Toh
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Full arthroscopic inlay reconstruction of posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Pier Paolo Mariani; Fabrizio Margheritini
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Radiological evaluation of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundle insertion sites of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  Stephan Lorenz; Florian Elser; Peter U Brucker; Tobias Obst; Andreas B Imhoff
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Graft choice and graft fixation in PCL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jürgen Höher; Sven Scheffler; Andreas Weiler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  The predictive effect of anatomic femoral and tibial graft tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on functional and radiological outcome.

Authors:  Michael Osti; Doris Hierzer; Alessa Krawinkel; Thomas Hoffelner; Karl Peter Benedetto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  No difference in graft healing or clinical outcome between trans-portal and outside-in techniques after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jae-Ang Sim; Jong-Min Kim; SahngHoon Lee; Eun-Kyoo Song; Jong-Keun Seon
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-07-29       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Is the all-arthroscopic tibial inlay double-bundle PCL reconstruction a viable option in multiligament knee injuries?

Authors:  Alexander E Weber; Benjamin Bissell; Edward M Wojtys; Jon K Sekiya
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  A comparison of arthroscopically assisted single and double bundle tibial inlay reconstruction for isolated posterior cruciate ligament injury.

Authors:  Oog Jin Shon; Dong Chul Lee; Chul Hyun Park; Won Ho Kim; Kwang Am Jung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2010-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.