| Literature DB >> 24416215 |
Myriam Heuertz1, Jérôme Duminil2, Gilles Dauby3, Vincent Savolainen4, Olivier J Hardy3.
Abstract
Comparative phylogeography is an effective approach to assess the evolutionary history of biological communities. We used comparative phylogeography in fourteen tree taxa from Lower Guinea (Atlantic Equatorial Africa) to test for congruence with two simple evolutionary scenarios based on physio-climatic features 1) the W-E environmental gradient and 2) the N-S seasonal inversion, which determine climatic and seasonality differences in the region. We sequenced the trnC-ycf6 plastid DNA region using a dual sampling strategy: fourteen taxa with small sample sizes (dataset 1, mean n = 16/taxon), to assess whether a strong general pattern of allele endemism and genetic differentiation emerged; and four taxonomically well-studied species with larger sample sizes (dataset 2, mean n = 109/species) to detect the presence of particular shared phylogeographic patterns. When grouping the samples into two alternative sets of two populations, W and E, vs. N and S, neither dataset exhibited a strong pattern of allelic endemism, suggesting that none of the considered regions consistently harboured older populations. Differentiation in dataset 1 was similarly strong between W and E as between N and S, with 3-5 significant F ST tests out of 14 tests in each scenario. Coalescent simulations indicated that, given the power of the data, this result probably reflects idiosyncratic histories of the taxa, or a weak common differentiation pattern (possibly with population substructure) undetectable across taxa in dataset 1. Dataset 2 identified a common genetic break separating the northern and southern populations of Greenwayodendron suaveolens subsp. suaveolens var. suaveolens, Milicia excelsa, Symphonia globulifera and Trichoscypha acuminata in Lower Guinea, in agreement with differentiation across the N-S seasonal inversion. Our work suggests that currently recognized tree taxa or suspected species complexes can contain strongly differentiated genetic lineages, which could lead to misinterpretation of phylogeographic patterns. Therefore the evolutionary processes of such taxa require further study in African tropical rainforests.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24416215 PMCID: PMC3885573 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084307
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Diversity patterns at the trnC-ycf6 region in 14 Afrotropical tree taxa.
| Point mutations only | All polymorphic characters | ||||||||||||||||
| Taxon | Family | N | pops | Ltot | L | S(singl.) | inv. | indel | SSR | haps | Hd | πT |
| haps | h | v | |
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| Fabaceae(Caesalpinioideae) | 17 | 8 | 1022 | 787 | 12(0) | 0 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 0.824 | 5.14 | 4.51 | 6 | 0.905 | 0.394 | |
|
| Sapotaceae | 13 | 7 | 759 | 721 | 1(0) | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.385 | 1.07 | 0.89 | 4 | 0.750 | 0.342 | |
|
| Meliaceae | 17 | 9 | 741 | 579 | 4(1) | 0 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 0.647 | 1.35 | 2.04 | 7 | 0.920 | 0.210 | |
|
| Malvaceae | 11 | 8 | 600 | 576 | 0(0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| Olacaceae | 18 | 9 | 853 | 598 | 0(0) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2 | 0.071 | 0.071 | |
|
| Ebenaceae | 14 | 8 | 794 | 621 | 5(3) | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.275 | 1.54 | 2.53 | 3 | 0.133 | 0.114 | |
|
| Fabaceae(Caesalpinioideae) | 20 | 11 | 1002 | 917 | 9(2) | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0.747 | 4.02 | 2.74 | 8 | 0.806 | 0.393 | |
|
| Annonaceae | 16 | 8 | 1019 | 977 | 4(0) | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0.733 | 1.47 | 0.15 | 4 | 0.786 | 0.298 | |
|
| Moraceae | 16 | 7 | 1020 | 939 | 1(0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.525 | 0.56 | 0.32 | 2 | 0.571 | nc | |
|
| Pandaceae | 12 | 8 | 915 | 893 | 0(0) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
|
| Fabaceae(Caesalpinioideae) | 13 | 8 | 985 | 894 | 7(0) | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0.821 | 2.50 | 2.52 | 6 | 1.000 | 0.380 | |
|
| Olacaceae | 16 | 9 | 887 | 719 | 26(0) | 0 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 0.783 | 13.85 | 10.90 | 6 | 0.875 | 0.337 | |
|
| Clusiaceae | 19 | 9 | 868 | 688 | 11(4) | 0 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0.842 | 4.83 | 4.57 | 10 | 0.933 | 0.321 | |
|
| Anacardiaceae | 19 | 9 | 712 | 612 | 1(0) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0.281 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 3 | 0.446 | 0.232 | |
| Overall | 15.8 | 8.4 | 870 | 752 | 5.8 (0.7) | 0.1 | 2 | 0.9 | 3.7 | 0.49 | 2.63 | 2.26 | 4.5 | 0.585 | 0.238 | ||
|
| |||||||||||||||||
|
| Annonaceae | 169 | 41 | 963 | 954 | 5(1) | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0.187 | 0.22 | 0.75 | 10 | 0.668 | 0.078 | |
|
| Moraceae | 127 | 20 | 939 | 939 | 2(1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0.399 | 0.44 | 0.39 | 3 | 0.528 | 0.280 | |
|
| Clusiaceae | 66 | 20 | 912 | 693 | 22(9) | 0 | 4 | 1 | 22 | 0.906 | 5.54 | 6.67 | 22 | 0.974 | 0.152 | |
|
| Anacardiaceae | 73 | 28 | 752 | 547 | 3(0) | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0.477 | 0.96 | 1.13 | 5 | 0.516 | 0.145 | |
N, sample size; pops, number of sampling locations; L, total length of alignment; L, length of alignment excluding gaps and missing data; S(singl.), total number of single nucleotide mutations (number of singletons); inv., number of inversions; indel, number of insertions/deletions; SSR, number of simple sequence repeats; haps, number of haplotypes; Hd, haplotype diversity; π and θ, estimates of nucleotide diversity x 103; h and v, genetic diversity based on ordered or unordered alleles; nc, not calculated. For details see materials and methods.
Figure 1Haplotype maps of 14 Afrotropical tree taxa (dataset 1).
Sizes of circles are proportional to the sample sizes of each population, haplotypes are colour-coded. Statistical parsimony networks of haplotypes are included for each taxon: each link represents a single mutation, white circles indicate unobserved putative haplotypes and the black box on the Strombosiopsis tetrandra network represents 26 mutations. The scale bar on the maps corresponds to 200 km.
Figure 2Two physioclimatic features of the Lower Guinea region that led to the formulation of alternative evolutionary scenarios for Afrotropical tree taxa.
A) The W-E environmental gradient, B) the N-S seasonal inversion, illustrated by the difference of January and July precipitation (mm).
Figure 3Haplotype maps of four Afrotropical tree species (dataset 2).
Sizes of circles are proportional to the sample sizes of each population, haplotypes are colour-coded. Statistical parsimony networks of haplotypes are included for each species: each link represents a single mutation; white circles indicate unobserved putative haplotypes. Red lines correspond to the three strongest genetic barriers (BARRIER program) identified in each species.
Figure 4Graphical representation of two evolutionary scenarios tested using coalescent simulations.
A) population divergence scenario, B) constant population size scenario.
Tests of population expansion and patterns of isolation by distance in 14 Afrotropical tree taxa.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |||||||
|
| * | ns | −0.167 | *** | −0.196 | *** | ns |
|
| * | * | −0.179 | *** | −0.176 | ** | ns |
|
| ns | ns | −0.093 | *** | −0.153 | *** | ns |
|
| nc | nc | nc | nc | nc | nc | nc |
|
| ns | ns | 0.002 | ns | 0.014 | ns | ns |
|
| * | ns | 0.007 | ns | 0.059 | ns | ns |
|
| * | + | −0.157 | *** | −0.231 | *** | * |
|
| ns | ns | −0.238 | *** | −0.181 | ** | ns |
|
| ns | * | −0.185 | ** | −0.169 | ** | ns |
|
| nc | nc | nc | nc | nc | nc | nc |
|
| * | ns | −0.144 | *** | −0.147 | * | ns |
|
| ns | ns | −0.147 | *** | −0.037 | ns | ns |
|
| + | ns | −0.103 | *** | −0.175 | *** | *** |
|
| ns | ns | −0.073 | * | −0.067 | + | ns |
|
| |||||||
|
| * | *** | −0.268 | *** | −0.401 | *** | ** |
|
| + | ** | −0.096 | *** | −0.179 | *** | ns |
|
| * | ns | −0.126 | *** | −0.173 | *** | ** |
|
| * | *** | −0.093 | *** | −0.092 | *** | ns |
blog(F
ij) and P(IBD_F
ij), slope and test of isolation by distance; blog(N
ij) and P(IBD_N
ij) slope and test of isolation by distance using ordered alleles; P(blog(N
ij)
Analysis of variance in 14 Afrotropical tree taxa under two evolutionary scenarios.
|
|
| |||||||
| Taxon | Region | Taxon | Region | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 2.134 | 0.086 | 0.131 | 0.72 | 2.300 | 0.068 | 0.544 | 0.467 |
|
| 2.936 | 0.028* | 0.105 | 0.749 | 3.215 | 0.019* | 0.426 | 0.52 |
|
| 2.543 | 0.048* | 0.038 | 0.848 | 3.285 | 0.018* | 0.009 | 0.926 |
|
| 2.662 | 0.040* | 0.003 | 0.954 | 3.655 | 0.011* | 0.000 | 0.997 |
|
| 0.640 | 0.786 | 0.233 | 0.633 | 1.133 | 0.408 | 0.280 | 0.601 |
|
| 0.263 | 0.989 | 0.827 | 0.372 | 0.261 | 0.990 | 3.908 | 0.059 |
F values and significance levels are given: *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001. Nhap, number of haplotypes; Npriv, number of private haplotypes; Ar, haplotype richness in a random sample of 3 sequences; genetic diversity with unordered (h) or ordered haplotypes (v); N, sample size.
Diversity estimates across 14 Afrotropical tree taxa under two evolutionary scenarios (dataset 1).
| Population | N | Nhap | Ar80 | Npriv | Arpriv80 | |
|
| West | 118 | 39 | 33.3 | 27 | 22.2 |
| East | 103 | 36 | 32.9 | 24 | 22.0 | |
|
| North | 95 | 36 | 34.0 | 21 | 21.0 |
| South | 126 | 42 | 33.8 | 27 | 20.8 |
N, sample size; Nhap, number of haplotypes; Ar, rarefied haplotype richness in a random sample of 80 sequences; Npriv, number of private haplotypes; Arpriv, rarefied private haplotype richness in a random sample of 80 sequences.
Diversity estimates in 14 Afrotropical tree taxa under two evolutionary scenarios.
| W-E scenario | N-S scenario | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| West (coast) | East (inland) | North | South | |||||||||||||||||||||
| W-E environmental gradient |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 11 | 0.764(0.083) | 4 | 2.34 | 3 | 6 | 0.800(0.122) | 3 | 2.40 | 2 | 8 | 0.714(0.123) | 3 | 2.21 | 3 | 9 | 0.556(0.165) | 3 | 1.91 | 3 | ||||
|
| 3 | 0.667(0.314) | 2 | 2.00 | 1 | 10 | 0.600(0.131) | 3 | 1.98 | 2 | 6 | 0.733(0.155) | 3 | 2.25 | 2 | 7 | 0.286(0.196) | 2 | 1.43 | 1 | ||||
|
| 10 | 0.511(0.164) | 3 | 1.83 | 3 | 7 | 0.857(0.102) | 4 | 2.57 | 4 | 10 | 0.644(0.152) | 4 | 2.10 | 2 | 7 | 0.905(0.103) | 5 | 2.71 | 3 | ||||
|
| 6 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | 5 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | 5 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | 6 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | ||||
|
| 14 | 0.143(0.119) | 2 | 1.21 | 1 | 4 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | 6 | 0.333(0.215) | 2 | 1.50 | 1 | 12 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | ||||
|
| 9 | 0.222(0.166) | 2 | 1.33 | 1 | 5 | 0.400(0.237) | 2 | 1.60 | 1 | 2 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | nc | 0 | 12 | 0.318(0.164) | 3 | 1.50 | 2 | ||||
|
| 11 | 0.346(0.172) | 3 | 1.55 | 3 | 9 | 0.806(0.120) | 5 | 2.46 | 5 | 12 | 0.803(0.078) | 5 | 2.45 | 4 | 8 | 0.643(0.184) | 4 | 2.11 | 3 | ||||
|
| 8 | 0.714(0.123) | 3 | 2.21 | 1 | 8 | 0.714(0.123) | 3 | 2.21 | 1 | 2 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | nc | 0 | 14 | 0.747(0.078) | 4 | 2.31 | 3 | ||||
|
| 3 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | 13 | 0.538(0.060) | 2 | 1.81 | 1 | 9 | 0.500(0.128) | 2 | 1.75 | 0 | 7 | 0.286(0.196) | 2 | 1.43 | 0 | ||||
|
| 5 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | 7 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | 4 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | 8 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | ||||
|
| 4 | 0.667(0.204) | 2 | 2.00 | 2 | 9 | 0.778(0.110) | 4 | 2.38 | 4 | 3 | 0.667(0.314) | 2 | 2.00 | 1 | 10 | 0.867(0.071) | 5 | 2.61 | 4 | ||||
|
| 11 | 0.891(0.063) | 6 | 1.68 | 5 | 5 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | 11 | 0.818(0.083) | 5 | 2.49 | 4 | 5 | 0.600(0.175) | 2 | 1.90 | 1 | ||||
|
| 13 | 0.795(0.085) | 6 | 2.43 | 5 | 6 | 0.933(0.122) | 5 | 2.80 | 4 | 9 | 0.694(0.147) | 4 | 2.20 | 4 | 10 | 0.778(0.137) | 6 | 2.42 | 6 | ||||
|
| 10 | 0.600(0.131) | 3 | 1.98 | 2 | 9 | 0.000(0.000) | 1 | 1.00 | 0 | 8 | 0.429(0.169) | 2 | 1.64 | 0 | 11 | 0.345(0.172) | 3 | 1.55 | 1 | ||||
| Average | 8.43 | 0.451 | 2.79 | 1.68 | 1.93 | 7.36 | 0.459 | 2.57 | 1.80 | 1.71 | 6.79 | 0.453 | 2.57 | 1.88 | 1.50 | 9.00 | 0.452 | 3.00 | 1.78 | 1.93 | ||||
| N species with larger valueWest or North | 9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 7 | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| N species with larger valueEast or South | 4 | 7 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 6 | ||||||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
| 80 | 0.648(0.036) | 7 | 4.03 | 3 | 1.70 | 89 | 0.540(0.055) | 7 | 4.03 | 3 | 1.71 | 61 | 0.585(0.059) | 5 | 3.97 | 2 | 2.05 | 108 | 0.598(0.026) | 8 | 3.61 | 4 | 1.70 |
|
| 28 | 0.349(0.090) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.00 | 99 | 0.415(0.042) | 3 | 2.18 | 1 | 0.18 | 85 | 0.266(0.056) | 3 | 2.17 | 1 | 0.21 | 42 | 0.512(0.017) | 2 | 2.00 | 0 | 0.05 |
|
| 48 | 0.847(0.029) | 14 | 7.98 | 12 | 6.61 | 18 | 0.909(0.044) | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8.63 | 35 | 0.822(0.067) | 8 | 6.48 | 7 | 6.03 | 31 | 0.805(0.042) | 15 | 9.99 | 14 | 9.54 |
|
| 31 | 0.582(0.093) | 3 | 2.83 | 0 | 0.05 | 42 | 0.582(0.076) | 5 | 4.30 | 2 | 1.52 | 34 | 0.451(0.060) | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0.28 | 39 | 0.529(0.084) | 5 | 4.14 | 3 | 2.43 |
N, sample size; h(SE), gene diversity and its standard error; Nhap, number of haplotypes; Ar, rarefied haplotype richness in a random sample of 3 sequences in dataset 1 or 18 sequences in dataset 2; Npriv, number of private haplotypes; Arpriv, rarefied private haplotypic richness; nc, not calculated.
Differentiation patterns in 14 Afrotropical tree taxa under two evolutionary scenarios.
| W-E scenario | N-S scenario | |||||||||
| Taxon | FST | NST | P(NST>NST(perm)) | FST | NST | P(NST>NST(perm)) | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 0.113 | + | 0.313 | ** | * | 0.368 | ** | 0.336 | ** | |
|
| 0.223 | + | 0.342 | * | 0.719 | ** | 0.316 | ** | ||
|
| 0.333 | *** | 0.139 | ** | 0.149 | * | 0.062 | |||
|
| nc | nc | nc | nc | nc | nc | ||||
|
| −0.130 | 0.000 | nc | 0.12 | 0.000 | nc | ||||
|
| −0.051 | −0.062 | −0.283 | 0.040 | ||||||
|
| 0.439 | *** | 0.660 | *** | * | 0.081 | 0.062 | |||
|
| 0.048 | 0.102 | 0.196 | 0.192 | ||||||
|
| 0.297 | 0.500 | 0.353 | + | 0.365 | + | ||||
|
| nc | nc | nc | nc | nc | nc | ||||
|
| 0.265 | ** | 0.349 | ** | 0.115 | 0.232 | + | |||
|
| 0.335 | ** | 0.280 | + | 0.074 | 0.257 | ||||
|
| 0.098 | + | 0.146 | + | 0.263 | *** | 0.491 | *** | + | |
|
| 0.233 | + | 0.167 | −0.061 | −0.025 | |||||
| Number of tests with P<0.05 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 0 | ||||
| Number of tests with P<0.10 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 1 | ||||
|
| ||||||||||
|
| 0.180 | *** | 0.154 | *** | 0.186 | *** | 0.299 | *** | * | |
|
| −0.013 | −0.009 | 0.255 | *** | 0.220 | *** | ||||
|
| 0.111 | *** | 0.148 | ** | 0.185 | *** | 0.252 | *** | ||
|
| −0.005 | −0.013 | 0.079 | * | 0.156 | *** | ||||
Estimates of differentiation statistics are followed by results from one-sided permutation tests for population structure. +, P<0.10; *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001; ns, not significant; nc, not calculated.
Simulation results showing summary statistics and the expected proportion of significant differentiation tests under divergence or constant population size scenarios for simulated deme sizes, N, and mutation rates, µ, and their comparison to observed data from dataset 1.
| Fastsimcoal parameters | Summary statistics | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Fraction of sampleswith significant | |
| Dataset 1 | 7.89 | 2.73 | 5.80 | 0.490 | 0.166 | 0.29 | |||||
| Divergence A1 | 10000 | 1 | 200 | 1600 | 2.00E-08 | 8 | 2.55 | 2.93 | 0.465 | 0.052 | 0.08 |
| Divergence A2 | 10000 | 1 | 200 | 1600 | 5.00E-08 | 8 | 3.68 | 6.90 | 0.661 | 0.055 | 0.10 |
| Divergence A3 | 2000 | 1 | 200 | 1600 | 1.00E-07 | 8 | 2.45 | 3.38 | 0.442 | 0.187 | 0.26 |
| Divergence A4 | 1000 | 1 | 200 | 1600 | 5.00E-08 | 8 | 1.85 | 1.74 | 0.305 | 0.215 | 0.17 |
| Divergence A5 | 1000 | 1 | 200 | 1600 | 1.00E-07 | 8 | 2.05 | 2.45 | 0.339 | 0.253 | 0.38 |
| Divergence A6 | 1000 | 1 | 200 | 1600 | 5.00E-07 | 8 | 3.62 | 10.17 | 0.649 | 0.430 | 0.85 |
| Divergence A7 | 5000 | 1 | 200 | 1600 | 1.00E-07 | 8 | 3.72 | 8.34 | 0.687 | 0.115 | 0.23 |
| Divergence A8 | 5000 | 1 | 200 | 1600 | 1.00E-07 | 30 | 6.17 | 11.86 | 0.686 | 0.129 | 0.73 |
| Divergence A9 | 2000 | 1 | 200 | 1600 | 1.00E-07 | 30 | 3.53 | 5.59 | 0.439 | 0.190 | 0.73 |
| Constant B1 | 1000 | 1 | 1.00E-07 | 8 | 1.98 | 1.57 | 0.352 | −0.007 | 0.00 | ||
| Constant B2 | 2000 | 1 | 1.00E-07 | 8 | 2.23 | 1.96 | 0.417 | 0.002 | 0.01 | ||
| Constant B3 | 2000 | 1 | 1.00E-06 | 8 | 4.73 | 12.64 | 0.794 | −0.007 | 0.04 | ||
| Constant B4 | 2000 | 1 | 1.00E-06 | 30 | 9.12 | 17.13 | 0.798 | −0.006 | 0.04 | ||
Averages over 100 independent simulations are shown, see Figure 4 and Table S4.
a The fraction of samples with significant F ST considers the proportion of 1-sided tests with P<0.05.
Figure 5Graphical representation of co-location of the three strongest genetic barriers (barrier density) observed across four Afrotropical tree species (dataset 2).
Barriers (in blue) are based on the pair-wise differentiation (G ST) among sampling locations. More intense coloration indicates higher barrier density.