Literature DB >> 24414460

Laparoscopic surgical management of localized recurrent ovarian cancer: a single-institution experience.

Valerio Gallotta1, Anna Fagotti, Francesco Fanfani, Gabriella Ferrandina, Camilla Nero, Barbara Costantini, Salvatore Gueli Alletti, Vito Chiantera, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Scambia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimally, secondary cytoreduction is acknowledged as a valid option in terms of oncologic outcome for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. In cases of localized relapse, a laparoscopic approach has been attempted at various institutions, but studies on its role for this subset of patients still are limited. This report describes the authors' experience using laparoscopic secondary cytoreduction for patients with localized recurrent ovarian cancer. The results from a retrospective analysis of a prospective case series are reported.
METHODS: Between October 2011 and May 2013, 29 patients with localized recurrent ovarian cancer were selected for a laparoscopic cytoreduction. Two conversions to laparotomy occurred. The analyzed outcome variables included stage and site of disease, type of surgical procedure, operative time, blood loss, length of hospital stay, complications, and oncologic outcome.
RESULTS: The median operating time was 188 min. The median estimated blood loss was 150 mL, and the median hospital stay was 4 days. Complete debulking was achieved for 96.2% of the patients. No intraoperative complications occurred, and postoperative complications were noted in only one patient. The median disease-free survival time was 14 months.
CONCLUSIONS: For selected patients, laparoscopy is a feasible and safe approach to optimal cytoreduction for patients with localized recurrent ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24414460     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3390-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Feasibility of laparoscopic debulking with electrosurgical loop excision procedure and argon beam coagulator at recurrence in patients with previous laparotomy debulking.

Authors:  Huong Trinh; Christopher Ott; James Fanning
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Narrow band imaging in gynecology: a new diagnostic approach with improved visual identification (Review).

Authors:  Iori Kisu; Kouji Banno; Kosuke Tsuji; Kenta Masuda; Arisa Ueki; Yusuke Kobayashi; Wataru Yamagami; Nobuyuki Susumu; Daisuke Aoki
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 5.650

3.  Prospective validation of a laparoscopic predictive model for optimal cytoreduction in advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Gabriella Ferrandina; Francesco Fanfani; Giorgia Garganese; Giuseppe Vizzielli; Vito Carone; Maria Giovanna Salerno; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Narrow-band imaging in laparoscopic management of cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  Francesco Fanfani; Cristiano Rossitto; Anna Fagotti; Valerio Gallotta; Maria Lucia Gagliardi; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.137

5.  Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy.

Authors:  Javier F Magrina; Rachel L Cetta; Yu-Hui Chang; Gregory Guevara; Paul M Magtibay
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 5.482

6.  Narrow-band imaging in laparoscopic management of recurrent platinum sensitive ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Maria Lucia Gagliardi; Salvatore Polito; Anna Fagotti; Francesco Fanfani; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.137

Review 7.  Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Khadra Galaal; Andrew Bryant; Ann D Fisher; Maha Al-Khaduri; Fiona Kew; Alberto D Lopes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

Review 8.  Can laparoscopic radical hysterectomy be a standard surgical modality in stage IA2-IIA cervical cancer?

Authors:  Jin Hwa Hong; Joong Sub Choi; Jung Hun Lee; Jeong Min Eom; Jung Hwa Ko; Jong Woon Bae; Seon Hye Park
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Laparoscopic staging of early ovarian cancer: results of a multi-institutional cohort study.

Authors:  Fabio Ghezzi; Mario Malzoni; Enrico Vizza; Antonella Cromi; Ciro Perone; Giacomo Corrado; Stefano Uccella; Francesco Cosentino; Emanuela Mancini; Massimo Franchi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-11-16       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Staging laparoscopy for the management of early-stage ovarian cancer: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Hyun Jong Park; Dong Wook Kim; Ga Won Yim; Eun Ji Nam; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 8.661

View more
  10 in total

1.  Minimally Invasive Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery for Superficial Celiac and Cardio-Phrenic Isolated Nodal Recurrence of Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  M Loverro; R Ergasti; C Conte; V Gallitelli; D Nachira; G Scaglione; A Fagotti; G Scambia; V Gallotta
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

2.  Prognostic factors for survival in patients with lung metastases from gynaecological tract cancers.

Authors:  Marco Chiappetta; Valerio Gallotta; Luca Pogliani; Edoardo Zanfrini; Anna Fagotti; Gabriella Ferrandina; Francesco Fanfani; Dania Nachira; Elisa Meacci; Maria Teresa Congedo; Filippo Lococo; Maria Teresa Giudice; Giovanni Scambia; Stefano Margaritora
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-03

Review 3.  Current Recommendations for Minimally Invasive Surgical Staging in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Anna Fagotti; Federica Perelli; Luigi Pedone; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2016-01

4.  Laparoscopy for primary cytoreduction with multivisceral resections in advanced ovarian cancer: prospective validation. "The times they are a-changin"?

Authors:  Marcello Ceccaroni; Giovanni Roviglione; Francesco Bruni; Roberto Clarizia; Giacomo Ruffo; Matteo Salgarello; Michele Peiretti; Stefano Uccella
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Conditional Relative Survival of Ovarian Cancer: A Korean National Cancer Registry Study.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Jaeman Bae; Johyun Ha; Kyu-Won Jung
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  ASO Author Reflections: Minimally Invasive Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery for Ovarian Cancer Lymph Node Recurrence: Shaping Treatment with All Arrows in our Quiver.

Authors:  Matteo Loverro; Raffaella Ergasti; Carmine Conte; Vitalba Gallitelli; Dania Nachira; Giulia Scaglione; Anna Fagotti; Giovanni Scambia; Valerio Gallotta
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Port site recurrence, an unintended consequence of laparoscopic resection of ovarian cancer. A case report.

Authors:  Paul H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2019-07-19

8.  Which patients on a gynecologic oncology service will require perioperative transfusion? A single-center retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gregory W Kirschen; Samantha M Dayton; Sophia Blakey-Cheung; Michael L Pearl
Journal:  Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 0.146

9.  Feasibility of laparoscopic cytoreduction in patients with localized recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  E Sun Paik; Yoo-Young Lee; Tae-Joong Kim; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.401

10.  Laparoscopic retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a patient with bulky paraaortic ovarian cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Reitan Ribeiro; João A Guerreiro; Murilo A Luz; Jeferson L Mattana; Maurício Zapparoli; William Kondo
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-10-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.