Literature DB >> 29052073

Laparoscopy for primary cytoreduction with multivisceral resections in advanced ovarian cancer: prospective validation. "The times they are a-changin"?

Marcello Ceccaroni1, Giovanni Roviglione1, Francesco Bruni1, Roberto Clarizia1, Giacomo Ruffo2, Matteo Salgarello3, Michele Peiretti4, Stefano Uccella5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary cytoreduction is the mainstay of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer (AOC). We developed and prospectively evaluated an algorithm to investigate the possible role of laparoscopic primary cytoreduction (LPC) in carefully selected patients, with AOC.
METHODS: From June 2007 to July 2015, all patients with stage III-IV ovarian cancer and clinical conditions allowing aggressive surgery were candidate to primary cytoreduction with the aim of achieving residual tumor (RT) = 0. The possibility of attempting laparoscopic cytoreduction was carefully evaluated using strict selection criteria. The other patients were approached by abdominal primary cytoreduction (APC). At the end of LPC, an ultra-low pubic mini-laparotomy was performed to extract surgical specimens and to accomplish a laparoscopic hand-assisted exploration of the abdominal organs, in order to confirm complete excision of the disease.
RESULTS: Of the included 66 patients, 21 were considered eligible for LPC; the remaining 45 underwent APC. Optimal cytoreduction (i.e., RT = 0) was obtained in 95 and 88.4% in the LPC and APC groups, respectively. No intra-operative complication and 4 (19%) early post-operative complications were observed among patients who received LPC. Patients who underwent APC had 17.8 and 46.7% intra- and early post-operative complications, respectively. Median time to initiation of chemotherapy was 15 (range, 10-30) days in the LPC group and 28 (20-35) days in the APC group. After a median follow-up of 51 months, 2-year disease-free survival was 76.2% in the LPC group and 73.4% in the APC group.
CONCLUSIONS: After strict selection, a group of patients with AOC may undergo LPC with extremely high rates of optimal cytoreduction, satisfactory perioperative morbidity, a short interval to chemotherapy, and encouraging survival outcomes. Clinical trial registration NCT02980185.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bowel resection; Debulking; Laparoscopy; Optimal residual tumor; Ovarian cancer; Primary cytoreduction

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29052073     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5899-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  32 in total

1.  Feasibility of laparoscopic debulking with electrosurgical loop excision procedure and argon beam coagulator at recurrence in patients with previous laparotomy debulking.

Authors:  Huong Trinh; Christopher Ott; James Fanning
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic (HAL) Multiple Segmental Colorectal Resections: Are They Feasible and Safe?

Authors:  Deepa Taggarshe; Bashir O Attuwaybi; Brian Matier; Jeffrey J Visco; Bryan N Butler
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-04

3.  Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial.

Authors:  Marcello Ceccaroni; Roberto Clarizia; Francesco Bruni; Elisabetta D'Urso; Maria Lucia Gagliardi; Giovanni Roviglione; Luca Minelli; Giacomo Ruffo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic Debulking Surgery in the Management of Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Giacomo Corrado; Emanuela Mancini; Giuseppe Cutillo; Ermelinda Baiocco; Patrizia Vici; Domenico Sergi; Lodovico Patrizi; Maria Saltari; Alberto Baffa; Enrico Vizza
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Laparoscopic posterior exenteration in advanced gynecologic malignant disease.

Authors:  Shailesh Puntambekar; Saravana Rajamanickam; Geetanjali Agarwal; Saurabh Joshi; Neeraj Rayate; Avanish Deshmukh
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Gynecol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 4.137

6.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Optimal primary management of bulky stage IIIC ovarian, fallopian tube and peritoneal carcinoma: Are the only options complete gross resection at primary debulking surgery or neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

Authors:  Vasileios D Sioulas; Maria B Schiavone; David Kadouri; Oliver Zivanovic; Kara Long Roche; Roisin O'Cearbhaill; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Douglas A Levine; Yukio Sonoda; Ginger J Gardner; Mario M Leitao; Dennis S Chi
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Interval Laparoscopic En-Bloc Resection of the Pelvis (L-EnBRP) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: Description of the technique and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Roberto Tozzi; Kumar Gubbala; Hooman Soleymani Majd; Riccardo Garruto Campanile
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of hand-assisted laparoscopy in predicting resectability of peritoneal carcinomatosis from gynecological malignancies.

Authors:  C Varnoux; C Huchon; A S Bats; C Bensaid; A Achouri; C Nos; F Lécuru
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Intratumoral T cells, recurrence, and survival in epithelial ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Lin Zhang; Jose R Conejo-Garcia; Dionyssios Katsaros; Phyllis A Gimotty; Marco Massobrio; Giorgia Regnani; Antonis Makrigiannakis; Heidi Gray; Katia Schlienger; Michael N Liebman; Stephen C Rubin; George Coukos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-01-16       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Laparotomy vs. minimally invasive surgery for ovarian cancer recurrence: a systematic review.

Authors:  Stefano Uccella; Massimo P Franchi; Stefano Cianci; Pier Carlo Zorzato; Francesca Bertoli; Salvatore Gueli Alletti; Fabio Ghezzi; Giovanni Scambia
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

2.  Aggressive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer performed by a multidisciplinary team: A retrospective analysis on a large series of patients.

Authors:  Stefano Rausei; Stefano Uccella; Valentina D'Alessandro; Baldo Gisone; Francesco Frattini; Georgios Lianos; Francesca Rovera; Luigi Boni; Gianlorenzo Dionigi; Fabio Ghezzi
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2019-06-30

Review 3.  Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in treatment of early-stage ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qingduo Kong; Hongyi Wei; Jing Zhang; Yilin Li; Yongjun Wang
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 4.234

4.  Perioperative and Survival Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Surgery, Comparison with Laparoscopy and Laparotomy, for Ovarian Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Qin Tang; Weichu Liu; Dan Jiang; Junying Tang; Qin Zhou; Jing Zhang
Journal:  J Oncol       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 4.501

5.  Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Surgery Versus Open Laparotomy for Interval Debulking Surgery of Advanced Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Systematic Review and A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Siyuan Zeng; Yongai Yu; Yuemei Cui; Bing Liu; Xianyu Jin; Zhengyan Li; Lifeng Liu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 5.738

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.