Literature DB >> 24412208

Spatial attention can be allocated rapidly and in parallel to new visual objects.

Martin Eimer1, Anna Grubert2.   

Abstract

In real-life visual environments, where multiple objects compete for processing, new objects that require immediate attention often appear when attention is already focused elsewhere. The question of whether spatial attention can be directed independently to different locations in the visual field remains controversial. Serial models assume a unitary attentional focus that is directed to one object at a time and moves rapidly between objects. According to parallel models, attention can be simultaneously allocated to several visual objects, but the distribution of attention cannot change rapidly when new objects arrive. Here we demonstrate the existence of a fast and flexible mechanism of attentional object selection, where focal attention is allocated in parallel and independently to different target objects. Using event-related brain potential (ERP) markers of visual attention, we show that when two targets appear in rapid succession at different locations, two separate foci of attention are established, each with its own independent time course. Attention can be maintained at its previous location while it is simultaneously allocated to a new target object. Our results challenge the view that the attentional focus is always unitary and that the spatial selection of multiple visual objects operates in a strictly serial fashion.
Copyright © 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24412208     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  15 in total

1.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Anna Schubö
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-05

2.  Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors.

Authors:  Christoph Huber-Huber; Anna Grubert; Ulrich Ansorge; Martin Eimer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Anticipatory alpha oscillation predicts attentional selection and hemodynamic response.

Authors:  Chenguang Zhao; Jialiang Guo; Dongwei Li; Ye Tao; Yulong Ding; Hanli Liu; Yan Song
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2019-01-29

5.  Consciousness: a unique way of processing information.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchetti
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2018-02-08

6.  Target detection and discrimination in pop-out visual search with two targets.

Authors:  James P Wilmott; Mukesh Makwana; Joo-Hyun Song
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Spatial cueing effects do not always index attentional capture: evidence for a priority accumulation framework.

Authors:  Maya Darnell; Dominique Lamy
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 8.  Multiple object individuation and subitizing in enumeration: a view from electrophysiology.

Authors:  Veronica Mazza; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Multivariate EEG analyses support high-resolution tracking of feature-based attentional selection.

Authors:  Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort; Anna Grubert; Christian N L Olivers; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  The whole is faster than its parts: evidence for temporally independent attention to distinct spatial locations.

Authors:  Andrew Clement; Nestor Matthews
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.