Adam S Duerfeldt1, Dale L Boger. 1. Department of Chemistry and the Skaggs Institute for Chemical Biology, The Scripps Research Institute , 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, California 92037, United States.
Abstract
Total syntheses of (-)-pyrimidoblamic acid and P-3A are disclosed. Central to the convergent approach is a powerful inverse electron demand Diels-Alder reaction between substituted electron-deficient 1,2,3-triazines and a highly functionalized and chiral primary amidine, which forms the pyrimidine cores and introduces all necessary stereochemistry in a single step. Intrinsic in the convergent approach is the potential it provides for the late stage divergent synthesis of modified analogs bearing deep-seated changes in either the pyrimidine cores or the highly functionalized C2 side chain common to both natural products. The examination of the key cycloaddition reaction revealed that the inherent 1,2,3-triazine mode of cycloaddition (C4/N1 vs C5/N2) as well as the amidine regioselectivity were unaffected by introduction of two electron-withdrawing groups (-CO2R) at C4 and C6 of the 1,2,3-triazine even if C5 is unsubstituted (Me or H), highlighting the synthetic potential of the powerful pyrimidine synthesis.
Total syntheses of (-)-pyrimidoblamic acid and P-3A are disclosed. Central to the convergent approach is a powerful inverse electron demand Diels-Alder reaction between substituted electron-deficient 1,2,3-triazines and a highly functionalized and chiral primary amidine, which forms the pyrimidine cores and introduces all necessary stereochemistry in a single step. Intrinsic in the convergent approach is the potential it provides for the late stage divergent synthesis of modified analogs bearing deep-seated changes in either the pyrimidine cores or the highly functionalized C2 side chain common to both natural products. The examination of the key cycloaddition reaction revealed that the inherent 1,2,3-triazine mode of cycloaddition (C4/N1 vs C5/N2) as well as the amidine regioselectivity were unaffected by introduction of two electron-withdrawing groups (-CO2R) at C4 and C6 of the 1,2,3-triazine even if C5 is unsubstituted (Me or H), highlighting the synthetic potential of the powerful pyrimidine synthesis.
Bleomycin A2 (n>an class="Gene">BLM, 1, Figure 1) is the major
component (∼70%) of the clinical anticancer
drug Blenoxane, which is currently used for the treatment of Hodgkin’s
lymphoma, melanomas, head and neck carcinomas, and testicular cancers.[1−4] BLM exerts its biological effects through a metal ion and oxygen
dependent[5−19] DNA cleavage that occurs selectively at 5′-GC or 5′-GT
sites.[4,7,12,15,20−25] Although capable of producing single-strand and double-strand breaks,
the latter is believed to be the most biologically relevant event.[26] Despite being an effective therapy for numerous
malignancies, BLM treatment is often limited by dose-dependent pneumonitis,
lung fibrosis, and skin toxicities, some of which have been attributed
to the C-terminal bithiazole appendage.[2,3,27,28] Thus, there remains
an interest in identifying synthetic BLM-based analogs that lack off-target
toxicity and maintain efficacy, which can be used as single component
oncology drugs.
Figure 1
Structure of bleomycin A2.
Structure of pan class="Chemical">bleomycin A2.
Each structural unit of pan class="Gene">BLM contributes an impn>ortant role
in the
DNA binding and cleavage cascade. Systematic evaluation of its structure
through single site deepn>-seated modifications prepn>ared by total synthesis
has delineated the function of each subunit and the role of their
individual substituents.[1,21,29−74] These studies, in conjunction with NMR-derived structural models
of DNA bound n>an class="Gene">BLM,[75−83] continue to define the remarkable combination of functional, structural,
and conformational properties integrated into the natural product.
The pyrimidoblamic acid subunit not only participates in the metal
chelation and O2 activation but also is responsible for
the DNA cleavage selectivity via triplex-like hydrogen bonding to
guanine at the 5′-GC and 5′-GT cleavage sites.[76] In such studies, we have additionally shown
that removal of the pyrimidine C5 methyl group, enlisting the functionalized
pyrimidine found in P-3A, has no impact in the functional activity
of the resulting BLM analog.[56] From these
studies, (−)-pyrimidoblamic acid (2, Figure 2) and the related peptide-derived
natural product, P-3A (3, Figure 2), have been identified as key subunits for the continued preparation
of improved or simplified bleomycin analogs. Total syntheses of (−)-pyrimidoblamic acid were originally described by
Umezawa,[32,42] Hecht,[30,50] and later
by us.[60,64] Although elegant and pioneering in their
own regards, these previous efforts have suffered from the inability
to fully control the stereochemistry at the benzylic pyrimidine C2
tertiary center (Scheme 1). Similarly, our
initial total synthesis of P-3A, whose pyrimidine core differs from
that of pyrimidoblamic acid by only the lack of the C5 methyl group,
relied on a late stage diastereoselective introduction of the benzylic
pyrimidine C2 tertiary center that proceeded with modest diastereoselectivity
(87:13).[59,66]
Figure 2
Structures of (−)-pyrimidoblamic
acid and P-3A.
Scheme 1
Prior Late Stage
Installations of the Benzylic C2-Stereocenter
of (−)-Pyrimidoblamic Acid
Structures of (−)-pyrimidoblamic
acid and pan class="Gene">P-3A.
Recently, we defined the cycloaddition scope
and productive reactivity
of substituted electron-deficient pan class="Chemical">1,2,3-triazines with various dienopn>hiles,
including the first repn>ort of their ability to participn>ate in previously
unexpn>lored [4 + 2] cycloaddition reactions with n>an class="Chemical">amidine or imidate
heterodienophiles to provide highly substituted pyrimidines.[84,85] These latter studies provided the basis for the potential development
of second generation asymmetric total syntheses of (−)-pyrimidoblamic acid and P-3A, in which all necessary stereochemistry
is installed prior to a late stage [4 + 2] cycloaddition introduction
of the pyrimidine, addressing the common limitation of previously
reported routes, permitting the late stage divergent modification
of their structures, and further expanding the scope of the 1,2,3-triazine
inverse electron demand Diels–Alder reaction to encompass the
use of chiral amidines.
We envisioned that the pan class="Chemical">pyrimidine core
of (−)-n>an class="Chemical">pyrimidoblamic acid would arise from an
inverse electron demand
Diels–Alder reaction between the highly functionalized amidine 4 and 1,2,3-triazine 5a (Scheme 2). Additionally, the same amidine 4 and its cycloaddition
with 1,2,3-triazine 5b would produce the pyrimidine core
found in P-3A.This late stage convergent assemblage of the pyrimidine
cores not only allows the early stage synthesis of the stereochemically
rich C2 side chain common to both pyrimidoblamic acid and P-3A but
also permits the late stage divergent synthesis of the natural products
utilizing two different 1,2,3-triazines. Amidine 4 was
expected to arise from the reductive alkylation product of N-(triphenylmethyl)-l-asparagine (6) with aldehyde 7. Key to the construction of 4 is the manipulation of intermediates, especially the desired
free-based amidine, without sacrificing the stereochemical integrity
of the α-stereocenter, as similar amidines have demonstrated
a propensity to epimerize.[86,87] This concern dictated
the late stage amidine introduction in order to minimize the potential
impact of amidine epimerization. 1,2,3-Triazines 5a and 5b, the electron-deficient heterocyclicazadienes for use
in the key cycloaddition reaction, were anticipated to arise from
an oxidative ring expansion of N-aminopyrazoles 9a and 9b.[88−91] A key caveat to the approach is that although the
two electron-withdrawing substitutents on the 1,2,3-triazines would
be expected to enhance their cycloaddition reactivity, it was unknown
whether their placement at the C4 and C6 positions would sterically
slow the reaction and electronically redirect the mode of cycloaddition
(C4/N1 vs C5/N2) with amidines.
Scheme 2
Retrosynthetic Analysis
Results and Discussion
Synthesis
of 1,2,3-Triazines 5a and 5b
The
requisite pan class="Chemical">N-aminopyrazole 9a for oxidative
ring expn>ansion to the n>an class="Chemical">1,2,3-triazine 5a was prepared
from 8a that was accessed by a palladium-mediated
tandem cross-coupling/electrocyclization reaction of commercially
available ethyl diazoacetate and the vinyl triflate derived from t-butyl acetoacetate (Scheme 3).[92]N-Amination of 8a was accomplished upon treatment with O-4-nitrobenzoylhydroxylamine
in the presence of potassium t-butoxide (t-BuOK) in N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP), which
yielded N-aminopyrazole 9a in 73% yield
in a near 1:1 mixture of inconsequential regioisomers.[93] In an analogous fashion and with similar yield
(72%), the requisite N-aminopyrazole 9b used to access 1,2,3-triazine 5b was prepared from
pyrazole 8b, which was generated from a [3 + 2] dipolar
cycloaddition between ethyl diazoacetate and t-butyl
propiolate.[94]
Scheme 3
Synthesis of Requisite N-Aminopyrazoles
Although a range of oxidants have been reported for transforming pan class="Chemical">N-aminopyrazoles into n>an class="Chemical">1,2,3-triazines, we have found that
the optimal reagent for this oxidative ring expansion reaction is
substrate dependent. The ring expansion is often suggested to occur
through a nitrene intermediate, which initiates N–N bond migration
and inserts the central nitrogen of the 1,2,3-triazine.[90] Adaptation of conditions developed by Ohsawa
and colleagues, in which an N-aminopyrazole is treated
with iodine (I2) in the presence of aqueous potassium bicarbonate
(KHCO3), provided the 1,2,3-triazine 5a in
excellent yield (75%).[91] These conditions
also proved effective for the production of 5b, yielding
the 1,2,3-triazine in 68% yield. Notably, 1,2,3-triazines 5a and 5b proved stable to extended storage at room temperature
and purification by flash chromatography using silica gel. As summarized
in Figure 3, the most commonly used oxidants
for this transformation (i.e., Pb(OAc)4, Ni2O3, and MnO2)[88−91] proved unsuccessful in converting 9a to the desired 1,2,3-triazine 5a, instead
resulting in N–N bond cleavage and reversion to the starting
pyrazole 8a.
Figure 3
Oxidative ring expansion survey.
Oxidative ring expansion survey.Silver(I) nitrate, a commonly utilized n>an class="Chemical">nitrene
transfer reagent
in aziridination,[95,96] alone failed to provide 5a but produced 5a in modest yield (34%) when
used in the presence of phenyliodine diacetate (PIDA) as a co-oxidant.
Similarly, sodium periodate (NaIO4),[84] which promotes the oxidative ring expansion efficiently
for 4-substituted N-aminopyrazoles, afforded the
1,2,3-triazine 5a in moderate yield (28%) with a majority
(70%) of the material isolated being a mixture of unreacted starting
material (9a) and free pyrazole (8a). Addition
of a phase transfer catalyst improved the conversions to as high as
70%, but was less consistent, and the use of tetrabutylammonium periodate
failed to generate any desired compound.
Synthesis of Amidine 4
pan class="Chemical">Amidine 4 was prepn>ared from commercially
available n>an class="Chemical">N-(triphenylmethyl)-l-asparagine
(6) and aldehyde 7 (Scheme 4). Reductive alkylation of 6 with 7 in the presence of excess NaBH(OAc)3 provided 10 in 84% yield. Treatment of 10 with 1-hydroxybenzotriazole
(HOBt) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDCI) followed
by NH3/THF, provided the primary amide 11.
Dehydration of 11 to provide the nitrile 12 was accomplished by treatment with N-propanephosphonic
acid anhydride (T3P) in the presence of Hunig’s base (i-Pr2NEt). Treatment of 12 with
50% aqueous NH2OH cleanly afforded amidoxime 13. All intermediates up to this stage, including 13,
exhibited a robust stability and no epimerization was observed throughout
the reaction sequence. Treatment of 13 with Raney Nickel
(Ra–Ni) in the presence of acetic acid (AcOH) in MeOH generated
the acetate salt of the desired amidine, which could be filtered through
Celite, redissolved in CH2Cl2, and treated with
20% aqueous NaOH to yield the free-based amidine 4. Chromatographic
purification of the amidine 4, as either the acetate
salt or the free base, resulted in partial epimerization. As a result,
the crude amidine was used without purification and produced immediately
prior to its use. Notably, the free-based amidine epimerized much
more readily than the protonated amidine in solution, and if the adjacent
secondary amine was protected as the t-butylcarbamate
(Boc), even more significant slow epimerization of the α-stereocenter
occurred upon amidine formation. Therefore, the free secondary amine
is essential to the observed stereochemical stability of the adjacent
amidine chiral center.
Scheme 4
Synthesis of Chiral Amidine 4
[4 + 2] Cycloaddition Reaction
of 1,2,3-Triazine 5a with Amidine 4
Effective access to the requisite
intermediates 4 and 5a set the stage for
examination of the key inverse electron demand Diels–Alder
reaction. Consistent with the electron-deficient character of the
pan class="Chemical">1,2,3-triazine, the cycloaddition reaction was found to proceed at
room tempn>erature or lower. Significantly, the intrinsic regioselectivity
of the n>an class="Chemical">amidine cycloaddition and 1,2,3-triazine cycloaddition mode
were unaltered by the C4/C6 substitution with electron-withdrawing
groups, and the amidine was found to add exclusively across C4/N1
(C6/N3) with no evidence of a redirected C5/N2 mode of cycloaddition.
By design and because of the pseudo-C2-symmetric nature of the product
pyrimidine, the cycloaddition across C4/N1 versus C6/N3 are indistinguishable,
permitting the differential ester protection. Although not all conditions
surveyed are included, Figure 4 summarizes
representative examples in the optimization of the reaction between 4 and 5a to provide the desired pyrimidine 14. In accordance with our previous studies,[84,85] which utilized 2.0 equiv of amidine, the investigation began with
this reaction stoichiometry. As summarized in Figure 4, an increase in reaction time and temperature significantly
increases the overall yield (entries 1–4). However, increasing
the reaction temperature diminished the diastereomeric purity of the
product, resulting from competitive amidine epimerization. Notably,
we found that the reaction produces a single diastereomer of 14 when conducted at 5 °C in acetonitrile (entry 5).
Because the 1,2,3-triazine 5a is the simpler of the two
reaction components, we focused on identifying conditions that employed
amidine 4 as the limiting reagent (entries 8 and 9 vs
6 and 7). When the reaction was conducted with 1.0 equiv of amidine 4 and 2.0 equiv of the 1,2,3-triazine 5a, the
yield increased to a respectable 46%. Finally, if the reaction was
allowed to stir at 5 °C for 14 h and then warmed to 25 °C
for 6 h, 14 was obtained as a single diastereomer in
54% yield.
Figure 4
Optimization of the [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction.
Optimization of the [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction.
Total Synthesis of (−)-Pyrimidoblamic
Acid
With
an effective route to 14 in hand, the synthesis of (−)-pyrimidoblamic
acid was completed (Scheme 5). The secondary
pan class="Chemical">amine of 14 was protected as the n>an class="Chemical">t-butylcarbamate
to provide 15 to eliminate oxidation risks later in the
synthesis. Chemoselective hydrolysis of 15 with 1 M aqueous
NaOH in THF:MeOH (3:1) was followed with a Curtius rearrangement to
provide 16 (78% yield over two steps). Removal of the
acetonide protecting group with p-toluenesulfonic
acid monohydrate (p-TsOH·H2O) in
MeOH yielded the Boc-protected amino alcohol 17, which
was subsequently treated with Jones’ reagent to give the carboxylic
acid 18. Conversion of 18 to amide 19 was accomplished upon treatment with HOBt and EDCI followed
by NH3/THF, which provided the fully functionalized and
protected (−)-pyrimidoblamic acid 19 in 96% yield.
Although attempts to promote a global deprotection with 4 M HCl in
EtOAc proved unsuccessful, as the tritylated carboxamide exhibited
an unusual stability to these traditional reaction conditions, treatment
of 19 with a 3:1 mixture of trifluoroacetic acid (TFA)
and CH2Cl2 followed by deliberate counterion
exchange with a 1 M aqueous HCl workup provided (−)-pyrimidoblamic
acid (2) in quantitative yield and identical in all respects
with authentic material.[29,64]
Scheme 5
Completion of the
Total Synthesis of (−)-Pyrimidoblamic Acid
Generality of the 1,2,3-Triazine/Amidine
[4 + 2] Cycloaddition
Although the similarity in the pan class="Chemical">pyrimidine
cores of (−)-pyrimidoblamic
acid and n>an class="Gene">P-3A is striking and may suggest that extrapolation of the
approach to P-3A is straightforward, it was not clear what the impact
of the C5 substituent might be. With electron-withdrawing groups at
the C4- and C6-positions of 5a and 5b, it
was still unknown whether the C5 methyl group affects the efficiency
of the cycloaddition reaction of 5a and if its absence
in 5b would alter the mode of cycloaddition. Thus, before
embarking on the synthesis of P-3A, we first examined the reactions
of the two 1,2,3-triazines 5a and 5b in
parallel. Remarkably, the less substituted 1,2,3-triazine 5b was even more reactive than 5a, providing the product
pyrimidine at a faster rate and in a higher yield in its reaction
at room temperature with the aliphatic amidine substrate, where good
conversion to the product was observed even within 5 min (Figure 5). Slower and a more comparable reactivity between 5a and 5b were observed with the aryl amidines.
Most significant in these studies is the fact that 5b showed no evidence of a potentially competitive cycloaddition across
C5/N2 (vs C4/N1) despite the lack of a C5 substituent. With this knowledge
in hand, the total synthesis of P-3A was pursued.
Figure 5
Comparison of the cycloaddition
reactions between 5a or 5b and amidines.
Comparison of the cycloaddition
reactions between 5a or 5b and pan class="Chemical">amidines.
Total Synthesis of P-3A
In accordance with the model
substrates, the cycloaddition reaction between 4 and 5b (25 °C, CH3CN, 12 h) yielded the desired
n>an class="Chemical">pyrimidine 26 in 76% yield as a single diastereomer (Scheme 6). In contrast to the reaction between 4 and 5a, which requires 5 °C for 12 h prior to
warming to 25 °C to prevent competitive epimerization and preserve
the amidine stereochemical integrity, the faster reaction between 4 and 5b can be conducted at 25 °C without
compromising the diastereomeric purity of the product and provided
the stereochemically pure pyrimidine 26 in even higher
yield (76%).
Scheme 6
Total Synthesis of P-3A
Following a synthetic route modeled on that used
to complete the synthesis of (−)-pan class="Chemical">pyrimidoblamic acid, compn>ound 26 was advanced (Scheme 6). n>an class="Chemical">Boc-protection
of the secondary amine provided compound 27, which was
subjected to saponification of the ethyl ester. However, attempts
to selectively hydrolyze the ethyl ester by treatment with 1 M aqueous
NaOH in THF/MeOH provided a mixture of compounds, which included those
derived from transesterification or hydrolysis of the t-butyl ester. By substituting t-butanol (t-BuOH) for MeOH as the reaction cosolvent the competitive
reactions were avoided and the reaction cleanly provided the requisite
carboxylic acid, which was subjected to Curtius rearrangement conditions
to provide 28 in good yield (82% over two steps). Removal
of the acetonide protecting group with p-TsOH·H2O in MeOH afforded the amino alcohol 29, which
could be transformed to the primary carboxamide 31 in
two steps. Global deprotection of 31 was effected by
treatment with TFA:CH2Cl2 (3:1) to provide 32, a key analog of (−)-pyrimidoblamic acid lacking
only the C5 methyl group, in quantitative yield. Additionally, treatment
of 31 with 1 M aqueous NaOH in THF:MeOH (3:1) results
in t-butyl ester hydrolysis and provided carboxylic
acid (33), which was coupled with N(Im)-Boc-l-His-l-Ala-O(t-Bu) to provide the
fully assembled but protected P-3A (34). Notably, this
coupling reaction enlisted a more highly protected derivative of 32 than our prior efforts[60,64] and proceeded
more smoothly, providing higher yields of the product 34. Global deprotection of 34 with TFA:CH2Cl2 (3:1) followed by counterion exchange with a 1 M aqueous
HCl workup provided P-3A (3), in quantitative yield and
spectroscopically identical in all comparable respects with authentic
material.[66,97]
Conclusions
Convergent total syntheses
of (−)-pan class="Chemical">pyrimidoblamic acid and
n>an class="Gene">P-3A were detailed based on the early stage preparation of the chiral
highly functionalized C2 side chain and subsequent late stage, divergent
construction of the pyrimidine cores through use of a powerful inverse
electron demand amidine/1,2,3-triazine [4 + 2] cycloaddition reaction
conducted at ≤25 °C. In addition to permitting full control
of the natural product stereochemistry, the approach provides the
opportunity for the late stage divergent synthesis of modified analogs
bearing deep-seated changes in either the pyrimidine core (C4 and
C5) or the highly functionalized C2 side chain. Such investigations
are in progress and will be reported in due course. The examination
of the key 1,2,3-triazine cycloaddition reaction with amidines defined
nonobvious 1,2,3-triazine substituent effects that maintain or enhance
the heterocyclic azadiene reactivity without altering the intrinsic
regioselectivity or mode of cycloaddition. These observations with
1,2,3-triazines extend the utility of the inverse electron demand
cycloaddition reactions of electron-deficient heterocyclicazadienes
that includes the complementary 1,2,4- and 1,3,5-triazines,[52,98−105] 1,2,4,5-tetrazines,[106−113] and 1,2-diazines[114,115] in the synthesis of highly substituted
and functionalized heterocycles found in complex natural products.[116,117]
Authors: Luca Parlanti; Robert P Discordia; John Hynes; Michael M Miller; Harold R O'Grady; Zhongping Shi Journal: Org Lett Date: 2007-08-24 Impact factor: 6.005
Authors: Benoit M Kenda; Alain C Matagne; Patrice E Talaga; Patrick M Pasau; Edmond Differding; Bénédicte I Lallemand; Anne M Frycia; Florence G Moureau; Henrik V Klitgaard; Michel R Gillard; Bruno Fuks; Philippe Michel Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2004-01-29 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Erin D Anderson; Adam S Duerfeldt; Kaicheng Zhu; Christopher M Glinkerman; Dale L Boger Journal: Org Lett Date: 2014-09-15 Impact factor: 6.005