Literature DB >> 24409104

Molecular dynamics simulations of highly crowded amino acid solutions: comparisons of eight different force field combinations with experiment and with each other.

Casey T Andrews1, Adrian H Elcock1.   

Abstract

Although it is now commonly accepted that the highly crowded conditions encountered inside biological cells have the potential to significantly alter the thermodynamic properties of biomolecules, it is not known to what extent the thermodynamics of fundamental types of interactions such as salt bridges and hydrophobic interactions are strengthened or weakened by high biomolecular concentrations. As one way of addressing this question we have performed a series of all-atom explicit solvent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to investigate the effect of increasing solute concentration on the behavior of four types of zwitterionic amino acids in aqueous solution. We have simulated systems containing glycine, valine, phenylalanine or asparagine at concentrations of 50, 100, 200 and 300 mg/ml. Each molecular system has been simulated for 1 μs in order to obtain statistically converged estimates of thermodynamic parameters, and each has been conducted with 8 different force fields and water models; the combined simulation time is 128 μs. The density, viscosity, and dielectric increments of the four amino acids calculated from the simulations have been compared to corresponding experimental measurements. While all of the force fields perform well at reproducing the density increments, discrepancies for the viscosity and dielectric increments raise questions both about the accuracy of the simulation force fields and, in certain cases, the experimental data. We also observe large differences between the various force fields' descriptions of the interaction thermodynamics of salt bridges and, surprisingly, these differences also lead to qualitatively different predictions of their dependences on solute concentration. For the aliphatic interactions of valine sidechains, fewer differences are observed between the force fields, but significant differences are again observed for aromatic interactions of phenylalanine sidechains. Taken together, the results highlight the potential power of using explicit-solvent simulation methods to understand behavior in concentrated systems but also hint at potential difficulties in using these methods to obtain consistent views of behavior in intracellular environments.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24409104      PMCID: PMC3881310          DOI: 10.1021/ct400371h

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  70 in total

1.  Aromatic-aromatic interactions in and around alpha-helices.

Authors:  Rajasri Bhattacharyya; Uttamkumar Samanta; Pinak Chakrabarti
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  2002-02

2.  Quantification of the hydrophobic interaction by simulations of the aggregation of small hydrophobic solutes in water.

Authors:  T M Raschke; J Tsai; M Levitt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparison of calculation and experiment implicates significant electrostatic contributions to the binding stability of barnase and barstar.

Authors:  Feng Dong; M Vijayakumar; Huan-Xiang Zhou
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Cell biology: join the crowd.

Authors:  R John Ellis; Allen P Minton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Extending the treatment of backbone energetics in protein force fields: limitations of gas-phase quantum mechanics in reproducing protein conformational distributions in molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Alexander D Mackerell; Michael Feig; Charles L Brooks
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.376

6.  Development of an improved four-site water model for biomolecular simulations: TIP4P-Ew.

Authors:  Hans W Horn; William C Swope; Jed W Pitera; Jeffry D Madura; Thomas J Dick; Greg L Hura; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-05-22       Impact factor: 3.488

7.  A biomolecular force field based on the free enthalpy of hydration and solvation: the GROMOS force-field parameter sets 53A5 and 53A6.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Alessandra Villa; Alan E Mark; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

8.  Molecular simulations suggest protein salt bridges are uniquely suited to life at high temperatures.

Authors:  Andrew S Thomas; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2004-02-25       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Quantitative protein stability measurement in vivo.

Authors:  S Ghaemmaghami; T G Oas
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  2001-10

10.  A molecular dynamics study of the dielectric properties of aqueous solutions of alanine and alanine dipeptide.

Authors:  Stefan Boresch; Martin Willensdorfer; Othmar Steinhauser
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-02-15       Impact factor: 3.488

View more
  11 in total

1.  Osmotic Pressure Simulations of Amino Acids and Peptides Highlight Potential Routes to Protein Force Field Parameterization.

Authors:  Mark S Miller; Wesley K Lay; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 2.991

2.  Diffusion within the cytoplasm: a mesoscale model of interacting macromolecules.

Authors:  Fabio Trovato; Valentina Tozzini
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  A consistent force field parameter set for zwitterionic amino acid residues.

Authors:  Anselm H C Horn
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 1.810

4.  Direct Comparison of Amino Acid and Salt Interactions with Double-Stranded and Single-Stranded DNA from Explicit-Solvent Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Casey T Andrews; Brady A Campbell; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Reparametrization of Protein Force Field Nonbonded Interactions Guided by Osmotic Coefficient Measurements from Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Authors:  Mark S Miller; Wesley K Lay; Shuxiang Li; William C Hacker; Jiadi An; Jianlan Ren; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 6.006

6.  Are current atomistic force fields accurate enough to study proteins in crowded environments?

Authors:  Drazen Petrov; Bojan Zagrovic
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  COFFDROP: A Coarse-Grained Nonbonded Force Field for Proteins Derived from All-Atom Explicit-Solvent Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Amino Acids.

Authors:  Casey T Andrews; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding.

Authors:  Michela Candotti; Modesto Orozco
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  Crowding in Cellular Environments at an Atomistic Level from Computer Simulations.

Authors:  Michael Feig; Isseki Yu; Po-Hung Wang; Grzegorz Nawrocki; Yuji Sugita
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Evaluating the strength of salt bridges: a comparison of current biomolecular force fields.

Authors:  Karl T Debiec; Angela M Gronenborn; Lillian T Chong
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.991

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.