Literature DB >> 18665720

Pigeons perceive the Ebbinghaus-Titchener circles as an assimilation illusion.

Noriyuki Nakamura1, Sota Watanabe, Kazuo Fujita.   

Abstract

A target circle surrounded by larger "inducer" circles looks smaller, and one surrounded by smaller circles looks larger than they really are. This is the Ebbinghaus-Titchener illusion, which remains one of the strongest and most robust of contrast illusions. Although there have been many studies on this illusion in humans, virtually none have addressed how nonhuman animals perceive the same figures. Here the authors show that the Ebbinghaus-Titchener figures also induce a strong illusion in pigeons but, surprisingly, in the other direction; that is, all five successfully trained pigeons judged the target circle surrounded by larger circles to be larger than it really is and vice versa. Further analyses proved that neither the gaps between target and inducer circles nor the cumulative weighted surface of these figural elements could account for the birds' responses. Pigeons are known to show similarities to humans on various cognitive and perceptual tasks including concept formation, short-term memory, and some visual illusions. Our results, taken together with pigeons' previously demonstrated failure at visual completion, provide strong evidence that pigeons may actually experience a visual world too different for us to imagine. (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18665720     DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.34.3.375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process        ISSN: 0097-7403


  17 in total

1.  Children and monkeys overestimate the size of high-contrast stimuli.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

3.  Do rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) perceive illusory motion?

Authors:  Christian Agrillo; Simone Gori; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.084

4.  Why do animals differ in their susceptibility to geometrical illusions?

Authors:  Lynna C Feng; Philippe A Chouinard; Tiffani J Howell; Pauleen C Bennett
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

5.  Perception of contextual size illusions by honeybees in restricted and unrestricted viewing conditions.

Authors:  Scarlett R Howard; Aurore Avarguès-Weber; Jair E Garcia; Devi Stuart-Fox; Adrian G Dyer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  The whole is equal to the sum of its parts: Pigeons (Columba livia) and crows (Corvus macrorhynchos) do not perceive emergent configurations.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Goto; Shigeru Watanabe
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Guppies (Poecilia reticulata) are deceived by visual illusions during obstacle negotiation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Angelo Bisazza; Christian Agrillo
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Do you see what I see? A comparative investigation of the Delboeuf illusion in humans (Homo sapiens), rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta), and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella).

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Sarah F Brosnan; Michael J Beran
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 2.478

9.  When less is more: like humans, chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) misperceive food amounts based on plate size.

Authors:  Audrey E Parrish; Michael J Beran
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 10.  The Challenge of Illusory Perception of Animals: The Impact of Methodological Variability in Cross-Species Investigation.

Authors:  Maria Santacà; Christian Agrillo; Maria Elena Miletto Petrazzini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-30       Impact factor: 2.752

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.