Literature DB >> 2017883

The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast.

M W Greenlee1, M A Georgeson, S Magnussen, J P Harris.   

Abstract

We explored the buildup and decay of threshold elevation during and after adaptation to sinewave gratings in a series of experiments investigating the effects of adapting time, adapting contrast, spatial frequency and retinal eccentricity. Contrast thresholds for vertical sinewave gratings truncated in space by a one-dimensional Gaussian envelope were measured before and after adaptation to a full-field suprathreshold grating of the same spatial frequency and orientation. Thresholds were measured intermittently after adaptation in a "seen/not-seen" single presentation procedure until these thresholds returned to baseline values. The first test grating was presented 300 msec after the offset of the adapting stimulus, and thereafter at regular intervals. At different times after adaptation, contrast thresholds were estimated by off-line analysis of the data using the QUEST algorithm. Adapting time was either 1, 10, 100 or 1000 sec and adapting contrast was either 9, 19, 29 or 39 dB (re. 1%). The test gratings were presented centered either at the fixation point or at 5 and 10 deg eccentricity along the horizontal meridian. The results suggest that up to the saturation level the buildup and the decay of adaptation to contrast is well described by a power function of time. The slope of the best fitting line on log-log axes is fairly constant for the adaptation times tested. As reported earlier, thresholds increased with adapting contrast and these contrast-dependent differences were evident 300 msec after the termination of adaptation. Adaptation at 10 deg eccentricity yielded slightly higher threshold elevations than for central vision. Based on these results, a description is given of the dynamic response of the underlying neural mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2017883     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90113-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  37 in total

1.  Attentional diversion during adaptation affects the velocity as well as the duration of motion after-effects.

Authors:  M S Georgiades; J P Harris
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Adaptation to temporal contrast in primate and salamander retina.

Authors:  D Chander; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Distinct mechanism for long-term contrast adaptation.

Authors:  Min Bao; Stephen A Engel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Linear systems analysis of the fMRI signal.

Authors:  Geoffrey M Boynton; Stephen A Engel; David J Heeger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  When sustained attention impairs perception.

Authors:  Sam Ling; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-09-10       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Adaptation to blurred and sharpened video.

Authors:  Andrew M Haun; Eli Peli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Human yaw rotation aftereffects with brief duration rotations are inconsistent with velocity storage.

Authors:  Andrew J Coniglio; Benjamin T Crane
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-10

Review 8.  Visual attention: the past 25 years.

Authors:  Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  Position specificity of adaptation-related face aftereffects.

Authors:  Márta Zimmer; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Contrast adaptation and representation in human early visual cortex.

Authors:  Justin L Gardner; Pei Sun; R Allen Waggoner; Kenichi Ueno; Keiji Tanaka; Kang Cheng
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.