Literature DB >> 24407153

Prevalence and nature of early glaucomatous defects in the central 10° of the visual field.

Ilana Traynis1, Carlos G De Moraes2, Ali S Raza3, Jeffrey M Liebmann2, Robert Ritch4, Donald C Hood5.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The macula is essential for visual functioning and is known to be affected even in early glaucoma. However, little is currently understood about the prevalence and nature of central vision loss in early glaucoma.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and characteristics of visual field (VF) defects in the central 10° in glaucoma suspects and patients with mild glaucoma using a prospective design. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective observational cohort study was conducted at an outpatient glaucoma specialty clinic. One hundred eyes from 74 patients with glaucomatous optic neuropathy and a 24-2 VF with mean deviation better than -6 dB were prospectively studied and tested with a 10-2 test. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Reliable: VF hemifields were classified as abnormal based on a cluster criterion, and abnormal 10-2 VFs were categorized based on the pattern of abnormal points: arcuatelike, widespread, or other. In addition, at each point of the 10-2 VF, the total deviation values were averaged across eyes and the number of abnormal points with total deviation values below a specific criterion level were calculated. RESULTS There appeared to be as many abnormal 10-2 hemifields (53%) as abnormal 24-2 hemifields (59%). Of the eyes with normal 24-2 hemifields, 16% were classified as abnormal when the 10-2 test was used. Of the abnormal 10-2 hemifields, 68%, 8%, and 25% were arcuatelike, widespread, and other, respectively. The average total deviation values and number of abnormal points plots revealed superior VF defects that were deeper and closer to fixation than those in the inferior VF. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The 10-2 VF was abnormal in nearly as many hemifields as was the 24-2 VF, including some with normal 24-2 VF, suggesting that the 24-2 test is not optimal for detecting early damage of the macula. The pattern of the defects was in agreement with a recent model of macular damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24407153      PMCID: PMC4204644          DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.7656

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2168-6165            Impact factor:   7.389


  14 in total

1.  Spatial pattern of glaucomatous visual field loss obtained with regionally condensed stimulus arrangements.

Authors:  Ulrich Schiefer; Eleni Papageorgiou; Pamela A Sample; John P Pascual; Bettina Selig; Elke Krapp; Jens Paetzold
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  The early field defects in glaucoma.

Authors:  S M Drance
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1969-02

3.  Initial parafoveal versus peripheral scotomas in glaucoma: risk factors and visual field characteristics.

Authors:  Sung Chul Park; Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Christopher C W Teng; Celso Tello; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 12.079

4.  The frequency distribution of earliest glaucomatous visual field defects documented by automatic perimetry.

Authors:  A Heijl; L Lundqvist
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1984-08

Review 5.  Glaucomatous damage of the macula.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Ali S Raza; Carlos Gustavo V de Moraes; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  Retinal ganglion cell layer thickness and local visual field sensitivity in glaucoma.

Authors:  Ali S Raza; Jungsuk Cho; Carlos G V de Moraes; Min Wang; Xian Zhang; Randy H Kardon; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-12

7.  Initial arcuate defects within the central 10 degrees in glaucoma.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Ali S Raza; Carlos Gustavo V de Moraes; Jeffrey G Odel; Vivienne C Greenstein; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Longitudinal and cross-sectional analyses of visual field progression in participants of the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study.

Authors:  Paul H Artes; Balwantray C Chauhan; John L Keltner; Kim E Cello; Chris A Johnson; Douglas R Anderson; Mae O Gordon; Michael A Kass
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-12

9.  Early foveal involvement and generalized depression of the visual field in glaucoma.

Authors:  J L Anctil; D R Anderson
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1984-03

10.  Classification of visual field abnormalities in the ocular hypertension treatment study.

Authors:  John L Keltner; Chris A Johnson; Kimberly E Cello; Mary A Edwards; Shannan E Bandermann; Michael A Kass; Mae O Gordon
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-05
View more
  70 in total

1.  Comparative glaucomatous diagnosis using macular optical coherence tomography and perimetry with centrally condensed stimuli: English version.

Authors:  A Sturm; W Noske
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  [Correlation of morphological and functional glaucoma diagnostics with macular OCT and perimetry with centrally condensed stimuli: German version].

Authors:  A Sturm; W Noske
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  Early glaucoma involves both deep local, and shallow widespread, retinal nerve fiber damage of the macular region.

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Anastasia Slobodnick; Ali S Raza; Carlos Gustavo de Moraes; Christopher C Teng; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-02-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Structural and functional correlates of visual field asymmetry in the human brain by diffusion kurtosis MRI and functional MRI.

Authors:  Caitlin O'Connell; Leon C Ho; Matthew C Murphy; Ian P Conner; Gadi Wollstein; Rakie Cham; Kevin C Chan
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 1.837

5.  What rates of glaucoma progression are clinically significant?

Authors:  Luke J Saunders; Felipe A Medeiros; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-13

6.  Macula Vessel Density and Foveal Avascular Zone Parameters in Exfoliation Glaucoma Compared to Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma.

Authors:  Shawn Philip; Ahmad Najafi; Apichat Tantraworasin; Toco Y P Chui; Richard B Rosen; Robert Ritch
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Sectorwise Visual Field Simulation Using Optical Coherence Tomographic Angiography Nerve Fiber Layer Plexus Measurements in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Liang Liu; Ou Tan; Eliesa Ing; John C Morrison; Beth Edmunds; Ellen Davis; Seema Gupta; Lorinna H Lombardi; Yali Jia; David Huang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Association of Macular Visual Field Measurements With Glaucoma Staging Systems.

Authors:  Carlos Gustavo De Moraes; Ashley Sun; Ravivarn Jarukasetphon; Rashmi Rajshekhar; Lynn Shi; Dana M Blumberg; Jeffrey M Liebmann; Robert Ritch; Donald C Hood
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.389

9.  Association of Glaucoma-Related, Optical Coherence Tomography-Measured Macular Damage With Vision-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Alisa J Prager; Donald C Hood; Jeffrey M Liebmann; C Gustavo De Moraes; Lama A Al-Aswad; Qi Yu; George A Cioffi; Dana M Blumberg
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 7.389

10.  The Relationship Between Intraocular Pressure and Rates of Central Versus Peripheral Visual Field Progression.

Authors:  Aakriti G Shukla; C Gustavo De Moraes; George A Cioffi; Christopher A Girkin; Robert N Weinreb; Linda M Zangwill; Jeffrey M Liebmann
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.