Literature DB >> 24406834

Do physicians disclose uncertainty when discussing prognosis in grave critical illness?

Rachel A Schuster, Seo Yeon Hong, Robert M Arnold, Douglas B White.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Even when critically ill patients are almost certain to die from their illnesses, there is generally an element of prognostic uncertainty. Little is known about how physicians handle this uncertainty in conversations with surrogate decision makers. We sought to evaluate whether and how physicians discuss prognostic uncertainty with surrogate decision makers of patients who are highly likely, but not certain, to die.
DESIGN: We audiotaped and transcribed discussions between clinicians and surrogate decision makers at two major California teaching hospitals from 2006 through 2008. Physicians completed a questionnaire addressing their prognostic estimates for patients' survival to hospital discharge. PARTICIPANTS: We included physicians and surrogates of 12 incapacitated, critically ill patients. MEASUREMENTS: We analyzed transcripts of discussions in which physicians' estimates of patients' chances of hospital survival were 1% to 5%; we coded whether physicians disclosed the prognostic uncertainty and, if so, how they conveyed that death was highly likely but not certain.
RESULTS: Physicians' estimates of short-term survival were 1% to 5% for 12 of the 70 patients enrolled in the original study. In 8 of 12 cases, physicians conveyed prognostic uncertainty by using probabilistic language or by an explicit mention of uncertainty. In four cases, physicians made at least one statement that either implied or was ambiguous about whether death was certain.
CONCLUSION: We observed variability in how physicians handle prognostic uncertainty in their discussions with surrogates of patients who are highly likely, but not certain, to die, including some circumstances in which physicians stated or implied that death was certain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 24406834      PMCID: PMC4132874          DOI: 10.1353/nib.2012.0033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Narrat Inq Bioeth        ISSN: 2157-1740


  23 in total

1.  Ethical aspects of determining and communicating prognosis in critical care.

Authors:  James L Bernat
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units: opportunities for improvement.

Authors:  Douglas B White; Clarence H Braddock; Sylvia Bereknyei; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-03-12

3.  Studying communication about end-of-life care during the ICU family conference: development of a framework.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Sarah E Shannon; Patsy D Treece; Mark R Tonelli; Donald L Patrick; Lynne S Robins; Barbara B McGrath; Gordon D Rubenfeld
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.425

4.  Clinician statements and family satisfaction with family conferences in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Renee D Stapleton; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Christopher H Goss; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Prognostication during physician-family discussions about limiting life support in intensive care units.

Authors:  Douglas B White; Ruth A Engelberg; Marjorie D Wenrich; Bernard Lo; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Communicating with dying patients within the spectrum of medical care from terminal diagnosis to death.

Authors:  M D Wenrich; J R Curtis; S E Shannon; J D Carline; D M Ambrozy; P G Ramsey
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2001-03-26

7.  Communication of prognostic information for critically ill patients.

Authors:  Michele M LeClaire; J Michael Oakes; Craig R Weinert
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Medical futility in end-of-life care: report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-03-10       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  An approach to understanding the interaction of hope and desire for explicit prognostic information among individuals with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or advanced cancer.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Ruth Engelberg; Jessica P Young; Lisa K Vig; Lynn F Reinke; Marjorie D Wenrich; Barbara McGrath; Ellen McCown; Anthony L Back
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 10.  Sustaining hope when communicating with terminally ill patients and their families: a systematic review.

Authors:  Josephine M Clayton; Karen Hancock; Sharon Parker; Phyllis N Butow; Sharon Walder; Sue Carrick; David Currow; Davina Ghersi; Paul Glare; Rebecca Hagerty; Ian N Olver; Martin H N Tattersall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.894

View more
  2 in total

1.  How acceptable is paternalism? A survey-based study of clinician and nonclinician opinions on paternalistic decision making.

Authors:  Kunal Bailoor; Thomas Valley; Chithra Perumalswami; Andrew G Shuman; Raymond DeVries; Darin B Zahuranec
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2018-05-03

2.  Uncertainty and certain death: the role of clinical trials in terminal cancer care.

Authors:  Dagoberto Cortez; Michael Halpin
Journal:  Sociol Health Illn       Date:  2020-01-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.