Literature DB >> 17353493

Toward shared decision making at the end of life in intensive care units: opportunities for improvement.

Douglas B White1, Clarence H Braddock, Sylvia Bereknyei, J Randall Curtis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In North America, families generally wish to be involved in end-of-life decisions when the patient cannot participate, yet little is known about the extent to which shared decision making occurs in intensive care units.
METHODS: We audiotaped 51 physician-family conferences about major end-of-life treatment decisions at 4 hospitals from August 1, 2000, to July 31, 2002. We measured shared decision making using a previously validated instrument to assess the following 10 elements: discussing the nature of the decision, describing treatment alternatives, discussing the pros and cons of the choices, discussing uncertainty, assessing family understanding, eliciting patient values and preferences, discussing the family's role in decision making, assessing the need for input from others, exploring the context of the decision, and eliciting the family's opinion about the treatment decision. We used a mixed-effects regression model to determine predictors of shared decision making and to evaluate whether higher levels of shared decision making were associated with greater family satisfaction.
RESULTS: Only 2% (1/51) of decisions met all 10 criteria for shared decision making. The most frequently addressed elements were the nature of the decision (100%) and the context of the decision to be made (92%). The least frequently addressed elements were the family's role in decision making (31%) and an assessment of the family's understanding of the decision (25%). In multivariate analysis, lower family educational level was associated with less shared decision making (partial correlation coefficient, 0.34; standardized beta, .3; P = .02). Higher levels of shared decision making were associated with greater family satisfaction with communication (partial correlation coefficient, 0.15; standardized beta, .09; P = .03).
CONCLUSIONS: Shared decision making about end-of-life treatment choices was often incomplete, especially among less educated families. Higher levels of shared decision making were associated with greater family satisfaction. Shared decision making may be an important area for quality improvement in intensive care units.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17353493     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.167.5.461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  93 in total

1.  Adaptive leadership: a novel approach for family decision making.

Authors:  Judith Adams; Donald E Bailey; Ruth A Anderson; Anthony N Galanos
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 2.947

2.  Internal medicine trainee self-assessments of end-of-life communication skills do not predict assessments of patients, families, or clinician-evaluators.

Authors:  Robert P Dickson; Ruth A Engelberg; Anthony L Back; Dee W Ford; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 2.947

3.  Use of augmentative and alternative communication strategies by family members in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Lauren M Broyles; Judith A Tate; Mary Beth Happ
Journal:  Am J Crit Care       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.228

4.  Communication practices in physician decision-making for an unstable critically ill patient with end-stage cancer.

Authors:  Deepika Mohan; Stewart C Alexander; Sarah K Garrigues; Robert M Arnold; Amber E Barnato
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.947

5.  Clinician-Family Communication About Patients' Values and Preferences in Intensive Care Units.

Authors:  Leslie P Scheunemann; Natalie C Ernecoff; Praewpannarai Buddadhumaruk; Shannon S Carson; Catherine L Hough; J Randall Curtis; Wendy G Anderson; Jay Steingrub; Bernard Lo; Michael Matthay; Robert M Arnold; Douglas B White
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  Family understanding of seriously-ill patient preferences for family involvement in healthcare decision making.

Authors:  Rashmi K Sharma; Mark T Hughes; Marie T Nolan; Carrie Tudor; Joan Kub; Peter B Terry; Daniel P Sulmasy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  The Influence of Race/Ethnicity and Education on Family Ratings of the Quality of Dying in the ICU.

Authors:  Janet J Lee; Ann C Long; J Randall Curtis; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.612

8.  Unpacking resident-led code status discussions: results from a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Rashmi K Sharma; Nelia Jain; Namrata Peswani; Eytan Szmuilowicz; Diane B Wayne; Kenzie A Cameron
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  The experiences of health care professionals, patients, and families of the process of referral and admission to intensive care: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Sophie Rees; Frances Griffiths; Christopher Bassford; Mike Brooke; Zoe Fritz; Huayi Huang; Karen Rees; Jake Turner; Anne-Marie Slowther
Journal:  J Intensive Care Soc       Date:  2019-03-11

10.  End-of-life care decisions in the PICU: roles professionals play.

Authors:  Kelly Nicole Michelson; Rachna Patel; Natalie Haber-Barker; Linda Emanuel; Joel Frader
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.624

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.