Literature DB >> 24406088

Factors that influence perforator thrombosis and predict healing with perforator sclerotherapy for venous ulceration without axial reflux.

Misaki M Kiguchi1, Eric S Hager1, Daniel G Winger2, Stanley A Hirsch1, Rabih A Chaer1, Ellen D Dillavou3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Refluxing perforators contribute to venous ulceration. We sought to describe patient characteristics and procedural factors that (1) impact rates of incompetent perforator vein (IPV) thrombosis with ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (UGS) and (2) impact the healing of venous ulcers (CEAP 6) without axial reflux.
METHODS: A retrospective review of UGS of IPV injections from January 2010 to November 2012 identified 73 treated venous ulcers in 62 patients. Patients had no other superficial or axial reflux and were treated with standard wound care and compression. Ultrasound imaging was used to screen for refluxing perforators near ulcer(s). These were injected with sodium tetradecyl sulfate or polidocanol foam and assessed for thrombosis at 2 weeks. Demographic data, comorbidities, treatment details, and outcomes were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable modeling was performed to determine covariates predicting IPV thrombosis and ulcer healing.
RESULTS: There were 62 patients (55% male; average age, 57.1 years) with active ulcers for an average of 28 months with compression therapy before perforator treatment, and 36% had a history of deep venous thrombosis and 30% had deep venous reflux. At a mean follow-up of 30.2 months, ulcers healed in 32 patients (52%) and did not heal in 30 patients (48%). Ulcers were treated with 189 injections, with an average thrombosis rate of 54%. Of 73 ulcers, 43 ulcers (59%) healed, and 30 (41%) did not heal. The IPV thrombosis rate was 69% in patients whose ulcers healed vs 38% in patients whose ulcers did not heal (P < .001). Multivariate models demonstrated male gender (P = .03) and warfarin use (P = .01) negatively predicted thrombosis of IPVs. A multivariate model for ulcer healing found complete IPV thrombosis was a positive predictor (P = .02), whereas a large initial ulcer area was a negative predictor (P = .08). Increased age was associated with fewer ulcer recurrences (P = .05). Predictors of increased ulcer recurrences were hypertension (P = .04) and increased follow-up time (P = .02). Calf vein thrombosis occurred after 3% (six of 189) of injections.
CONCLUSIONS: Thrombosis of IPVs with UGS increases venous ulcer healing in a difficult patient population. Complete closure of all IPVs in an ulcerated limb was the only predictor of ulcer healing. Men and patients taking warfarin have decreased rates of IPV thrombosis with UGS.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24406088      PMCID: PMC4027057          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  42 in total

1.  CEAP classification for chronic venous disease.

Authors:  Frank T Padberg
Journal:  Dis Mon       Date:  2005 Feb-Mar       Impact factor: 3.800

2.  Indications for compression therapy in venous and lymphatic disease consensus based on experimental data and scientific evidence. Under the auspices of the IUP.

Authors:  H Partsch; M Flour; P Coleridge Smith
Journal:  Int Angiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.789

Review 3.  Evidence on efficacy of treatments of venous ulcers and on prevention of ulcer recurrence.

Authors:  Peter Gloviczki; Monika L Gloviczki
Journal:  Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-12

4.  Sclerotherapy of telangiectases and reticular veins: a double-blind, randomized, comparative clinical trial of polidocanol, sodium tetradecyl sulphate and isotonic saline (EASI study).

Authors:  E Rabe; D Schliephake; J Otto; F X Breu; F Pannier
Journal:  Phlebology       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.740

5.  The impact of ablation of incompetent superficial and perforator veins on ulcer healing rates.

Authors:  Michael Harlander-Locke; Peter F Lawrence; Ali Alktaifi; Juan Carlos Jimenez; David Rigberg; Brian DeRubertis
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 4.268

6.  Radiofrequency ablation of incompetent perforator veins.

Authors:  Eric Peden; Alan Lumsden
Journal:  Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther       Date:  2007-03

7.  Risk factors for delayed healing and recurrence of chronic venous leg ulcers--an analysis of 1324 legs.

Authors:  M S Gohel; M Taylor; J J Earnshaw; B P Heather; K R Poskitt; M R Whyman
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 7.069

8.  Comparison of surgery and compression with compression alone in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR study): randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jamie R Barwell; Colin E Davies; Jane Deacon; Kate Harvey; Julia Minor; Antonio Sassano; Maxine Taylor; Jenny Usher; Clare Wakely; Jonathan J Earnshaw; Brian P Heather; David C Mitchell; Mark R Whyman; Keith R Poskitt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004-06-05       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 9.  Compression for venous leg ulcers.

Authors:  Susan O'Meara; Nicky A Cullum; E Andrea Nelson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21

10.  Healing of venous ulcers in an ambulatory care program: the roles of chronic venous insufficiency and patient compliance.

Authors:  C A Erickson; D J Lanza; D L Karp; J W Edwards; G R Seabrook; R A Cambria; J A Freischlag; J B Towne
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.268

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive treatments for perforator vein insufficiency.

Authors:  Gokhan Kuyumcu; Gloria Maria Salazar; Anand M Prabhakar; Suvranu Ganguli
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-12

2.  The Wound Healing Index for Predicting Venous Leg Ulcer Outcome.

Authors:  Caroline E Fife; Susan D Horn
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Complete Venous Ulceration Healing after Perforator Ablation Does Not Depend on Treatment Modality.

Authors:  Katherine M Reitz; Karim Salem; Abhisekh Mohapatra; Nathan L Liang; Efthymios D Avgerinos; Michael J Singh; Eric Hager
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 1.466

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.