Literature DB >> 24405729

Maternal and perinatal outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies.

D Caserta1, G Bordi2, M Stegagno3, F Filippini4, M Podagrosi4, D Roselli5, M Moscarini2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal and perinatal outcomes in twin pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive techniques (ART) compared with spontaneous twin pregnancies. STUDY
DESIGN: This retrospective study examined 345 dichorionic, di-amniotic twin pregnancies (207 conceived spontaneously and 138 conceived via ART), delivered between January 2007 and June 2011 at the San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome, a tertiary medical centre. Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared. A multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate risk estimates as odds ratios (OR) adjusted for maternal age, parity and systemic diseases. Patient data were obtained from a computerized database and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 17.
RESULTS: Gestational age and birth weight were lower in the ART group, and preterm delivery, gestational diabetes and placental abruption were higher in the ART group compared with the spontaneous conception group. The incidence rates of respiratory complications, patent ductus arteriosus and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit were higher among ART newborns. Length of hospital stay for mothers and newborns was longer in the ART group. No differences in mode of delivery, Apgar score at 5min, congenital anomalies, perinatal mortality, and other considered pregnancy and neonatal complications were found between the two groups. Multivariate analysis adjusted for maternal age, parity and systemic diseases revealed that only the rates of placental abruption [OR 7.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.05-26.98] and patent ductus arteriosus (OR 3.39, 95% CI 1.01-11.46) were significantly higher for the ART group.
CONCLUSIONS: Twin pregnancies conceived via ART are at greater risk of poorer outcomes than spontaneous twin pregnancies. This may be related to the type of conception and specific negative features of subfertile patients undergoing infertility treatment.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Assisted reproductive techniques; Neonatal complications; Perinatal outcomes; Twin pregnancies

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24405729     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  10 in total

1.  Estimates of lifetime infertility from three states: the behavioral risk factor surveillance system.

Authors:  Sara Crawford; Chris Fussman; Marie Bailey; Dana Bernson; Denise J Jamieson; Melissa Murray-Jordan; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Assisted reproductive technology use, embryo transfer practices, and birth outcomes after infertility insurance mandates: New Jersey and Connecticut.

Authors:  Sara Crawford; Sheree L Boulet; Denise J Jamieson; Carol Stone; Jewel Mullen; Dmitry M Kissin
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Neonatal outcomes among twins stratified by method of conception: secondary analysis of maternal fetal medicine (MFMU) network database.

Authors:  Jaimin S Shah; Susan Hosseini Nasab; Neil Chappell; Han-Yang Chen; Amy Schutt; Hector Mendez-Figueroa
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Adverse pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes in twins: effects of maternal fertility status and infant gender combinations; the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.

Authors:  Barbara Luke; Daksha Gopal; Howard Cabral; Judy E Stern; Hafsatou Diop
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Concordance of the risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity assessed by quantitative ultrasound lung texture analysis in fetuses of twin pregnancies.

Authors:  Ana L Moreno-Espinosa; Ameth Hawkins-Villarreal; Xavier P Burgos-Artizzu; David Coronado-Gutierrez; Santiago Castelazo; Diana L Lip-Sosa; Javiera Fuenzalida; Dahiana M Gallo; Tatiana Peña-Ramirez; Paula Zuazagoitia; Miriam Muñoz; Mauro Parra-Cordero; Eduard Gratacòs; Montse Palacio
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Protein C global assay evaluation in naturally conceived vs. assisted reproduction-achieved twin pregnancies: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  Johnny S Younis; Mariana Issawy; Ido Izhaki; Izhar Ben-Shlomo; Sofia Soltsman; Yuri Perlitz; Moshe Ben-Ami; Benjamin Brenner; Galit Sarig
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 2.344

7.  Clinical outcomes after assisted reproductive technology in twin pregnancies: chorionicity-based comparison.

Authors:  Luming Sun; Gang Zou; Xing Wei; Yan Chen; Jun Zhang; Nanette Okun; Tao Duan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Obstetrics and perinatal outcomes of dichorionic twin pregnancy following ART compared with spontaneous pregnancy.

Authors:  Leila Pourali; Sedigheh Ayati; Shahrzad Jelodar; Ahmadreza Zarifian; Mohammad Sobhan Sheikh Andalibi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed (Yazd)       Date:  2016-05

9.  Short-term surgical outcomes of preterm infants with necrotizing enterocolitis: A single-center experience.

Authors:  Qingfeng Sheng; Zhibao Lv; Weijue Xu; Jiangbin Liu; Yibo Wu; Jingyi Shi; Zhengjun Xi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in Europe: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence Studies.

Authors:  Marília Silva Paulo; Noor Motea Abdo; Rita Bettencourt-Silva; Rami H Al-Rifai
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 6.055

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.