Literature DB >> 12478505

Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a meta-analysis.

Khaled J Saleh1, Daryll C Dykes, Richard L Tweedie, Khadeeja Mohamed, Ashwin Ravichandran, Raied M Saleh, Terence J Gioe, David A Heck.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to perform a systematic literature review to describe patient outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision procedures using various global knee score ratings. English language articles published from 1966 through 2000 were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. A multistage assessment was used to determine the articles containing data that could meet our objective. Meta-analyses of global knee scores were undertaken using a fixed effects model with the assumption that the variances of each individual measurement were identical across studies. The initial inclusion criteria were met by 58 articles with a total of 1965 patients. There were 42 articles comprising 45 unique patient cohorts and a total of 1515 patients that had sufficient global knee score data for analysis and were used in the meta-analyses. Revision total knee arthroplasty is an effective procedure for failed knee arthroplasties based on global knee rating scales. Copyright 2002, Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12478505     DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.35823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  17 in total

Review 1.  [A rapid review of the minimum quality problems using total knee arthroplasty as an example. Where do the magical threshold values come from?].

Authors:  D Stengel; A Ekkernkamp; J Dettori; B Hanson; K M Stürmer; H Siebert
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Predictive factors for failure after total knee replacement revision.

Authors:  Rafael Luque; Belen Rizo; Antonio Urda; Rodrigo Garcia-Crespo; Enrique Moro; Fernando Marco; Luis López-Duran
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  When do patient-reported assessments peak after revision knee arthroplasty?

Authors:  Ajay Malviya; Karen Bettinson; Steven M Kurtz; David J Deehan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Infection management of megaimplants].

Authors:  R Ascherl
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Reason for revision TKA predicts clinical outcome: prospective evaluation of 150 consecutive patients with 2-years followup.

Authors:  Robin W T M van Kempen; Janneke J P Schimmel; Gijs G van Hellemondt; Hilde Vandenneucker; Ate B Wymenga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-03-30       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Juliette A Meyer; Mark Zhu; Alana Cavadino; Brendan Coleman; Jacob T Munro; Simon W Young
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-30       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Predictors of moderate-severe functional limitation 2 and 5 years after revision total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jasvinder A Singh; Megan M O'Byrne; W Scott Harmsen; David G Lewallen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score has higher responsiveness and lower ceiling effect than Knee Society Function Score after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Amy K Steinhoff; William D Bugbee
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-23       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause.

Authors:  S M Javad Mortazavi; Jeremy Molligan; Matthew S Austin; James J Purtill; William J Hozack; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Reason for revision influences early patient outcomes after aseptic knee revision.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Paul Cowling; Steven Kurtz; Simon Jameson; Paul Gregg; David Deehan
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.