| Literature DB >> 24400079 |
Atsushi Sekiguchi1, Motoaki Sugiura2, Yasuyuki Taki3, Yuka Kotozaki4, Rui Nouchi5, Hikaru Takeuchi6, Tsuyoshi Araki4, Sugiko Hanawa7, Seishu Nakagawa7, Carlos Makoto Miyauchi8, Atsushi Sakuma9, Ryuta Kawashima10.
Abstract
Many survivors of severe disasters need psychological support, even those not suffering post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The critical issue in understanding the psychological response after experiencing severe disasters is to distinguish neurological microstructural underpinnings as vulnerability factors from signs of emotional distress acquired soon after the stressful life event. We collected diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging (DTI) data from a group of healthy adolescents before the Great East Japan Earthquake and re-examined the DTIs and anxiety levels of 30 non-PTSD subjects from this group 3-4 months after the earthquake using voxel-based analyses in a longitudinal DTI study before and after the earthquake. We found that the state anxiety level after the earthquake was negatively associated with fractional anisotropy (FA) in the right anterior cingulum (Cg) before the earthquake (r = -0.61, voxel level p<0.0025, cluster level p<0.05 corrected), and positively associated with increased FA changes from before to after the earthquake in the left anterior Cg (r = 0.70, voxel level p<0.0025, cluster level p<0.05 corrected) and uncinate fasciculus (Uf) (r = 0.65, voxel level p<0.0025, cluster level p<0.05 corrected). The results demonstrated that lower FA in the right anterior Cg was a vulnerability factor and increased FA in the left anterior Cg and Uf was an acquired sign of state anxiety after the earthquake. We postulate that subjects with dysfunctions in processing fear and anxiety before the disaster were likely to have higher anxiety levels requiring frequent emotional regulation after the disaster. These findings provide new evidence of psychophysiological responses at the neural network level soon after a stressful life event and might contribute to the development of effective methods to prevent PTSD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24400079 PMCID: PMC3882214 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083967
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographic characteristics of the non-PTSD survivors.
| Number of subjects (male/female) | 30 (24/6) |
| Age (years) | 21.0±1.6 |
| Number of previous lifetime traumas | 1.97±1.0 |
| Period between pre- and post-earthquake MR imaging (days) | 271.4±122.9 |
| CAPS | |
| Total | 7.0±11.5 |
| Re-experience | 1.7±2.7 |
| Avoidance | 2.5±5.1 |
| Hyperarousal | 2.8±5.1 |
| CESD score | 11.3±10.0 |
| STAI scores | |
| State | 42.9±11.2 |
| Trait | 42.5±9.1 |
| SCI scores | |
| Co | 32.7±14.2 |
| Em | 30.7±9.8 |
Values are shown as means ± standard deviations.
CAPS, clinician-administered PTSD scale; CESD, Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale; STAI, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory; SCI, Stress Coping Inventory; Co, cognitive coping strategy; Em, emotional coping strategy.
Distribution of anxiety levels.
| Extremely low | Low | Normal | High | Extremely high | |
| State | 0 | 5 | 10 | 10 | 5 |
| Trait | 0 | 3 | 16 | 6 | 5 |
STAI, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory.
Figure 1Relationship between state anxiety and FA.
State anxiety scores were negatively associated with Pre FA in the right anterior Cg (a, r = −0.61, p = 0.0004) and Post–Pre FA in the left anterior Cg (b, r = 0.70, p = 0.00002) and the left Uf (b, r = 0.65, p = 0.0001), as illustrated by the scatter plots on the right. Vertical axes represent FA values at peak voxels in each cluster and horizontal axes indicate total state anxiety scores. The left Uf and the Ac were included in the same cluster. FA, fractional anisotropy; Rt, right; Lt, left; Cg, cingulum; Uf, uncinate fasciculus.
MNI coordinates, voxel sizes, z-scores, and P-values for results of the SPM analyses.
| Brain region | MNI coordinates | k (voxels) |
|
|
| x y z | (cluster level) | |||
| Pre | ||||
| Rt Cg | 20 36 0 | 310 | 4.62 | 0.010 |
| Post–Pre | ||||
| Lt Cg | −22 34 18 | 128 | 4.34 | 0.026 |
| Lt Uf | −18 26 −8 | 161 | 4.12 | 0.013 |
| Ac | −10 18 −8 | 3.83 |
MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; Rt, right; Lt, left.
Cg, cingulum; Uf, uncinate fasciculus; Ac, anterior commissure.
*The Ac is included in the same cluster as the Lt Uf.
Figure 2SEM implemented on a path diagram.
The strength of the path coefficients between state anxiety scores and Pre FA in the right anterior Cg (−0.40, p<0.001) and between state anxiety scores and Post–Pre FA in the left anterior Cg (0.43, p<0.01) and the left Uf (0.29, p = 0.06) are shown. The path coefficient strength between Post–Pre FA in the left anterior Cg and the left Uf (0.65, p<0.005) are shown as well. The brain regions that predict state anxiety level evaluated by STAI are shown on the left. FA, fractional anisotropy; Rt, right; Lt, left; Cg, cingulum; Uf, uncinate fasciculus; STAI, State–Trait Anxiety Inventory.