| Literature DB >> 24397835 |
Jianbo Wang, Yibin Jia, Nana Wang, Xiaomei Zhang, Bingxu Tan, Guangyu Zhang, Yufeng Cheng1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The interaction between tumor cells and inflammatory cells has not been systematically investigated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The main aims of the study were to investigate the clinical significance of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils and neturophil-to-CD8+ lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and to analyze the distribution of tumor-infiltrating neutrophils and CD8+ lymphocytes in ESCC treated by curative resection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24397835 PMCID: PMC3895663 DOI: 10.1186/1479-5876-12-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Transl Med ISSN: 1479-5876 Impact factor: 5.531
Correlation of intratumoral CD66+ neutrophils, CD8+ lymphocytes and NLR with clinicopathological parameters
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Male | 72 | 34 | 38 | 0.292 | 36 | 36 | 1.0 | 39 | 33 | 0.46 |
| Female | 18 | 11 | 7 | | 9 | 9 | | 8 | 10 | |
| 42-78 | | | | | | | | | | |
| <60.5b | 45 | 25 | 20 | 0.292 | 28 | 17 | 21 | 24 | 0.291 | |
| ≥60.5 | 45 | 20 | 25 | | 17 | 28 | | 26 | 19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Upper | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1.0 | 6 | 4 | 0.438 | 6 | 4 | 0.858 |
| Middle | 48 | 24 | 24 | | 21 | 27 | | 25 | 23 | |
| Lower | 32 | 16 | 16 | | 18 | 14 | | 16 | 16 | |
| 0.5-8.5 | | | | | | | | | | |
| <4b | 52 | 21 | 23 | 0.673 | 21 | 23 | 0.673 | 20 | 24 | 0.209 |
| ≥4 | 38 | 24 | 22 | | 24 | 22 | | 27 | 19 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Well | 25 | 14 | 11 | 0.764 | 11 | 14 | 0.744 | 12 | 13 | 0.777 |
| Middle | 39 | 19 | 20 | | 21 | 18 | | 22 | 17 | |
| Poor | 26 | 12 | 14 | | 13 | 13 | | 13 | 13 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1 and 2 | 31 | 18 | 13 | 0.267 | 15 | 16 | 0.824 | 17 | 14 | 0.719 |
| 3 and 4 | 59 | 27 | 32 | | 30 | 29 | | 30 | 29 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Negative | 57 | 34 | 23 | 29 | 28 | 0.827 | 30 | 27 | 0.919 | |
| Positive | 33 | 11 | 22 | | 16 | 17 | | 17 | 16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 0 | 57 | 34 | 23 | 0.055 | 29 | 28 | 0.968 | 30 | 27 | 0.835 |
| 1 | 12 | 4 | 8 | | 6 | 6 | | 7 | 5 | |
| ≥2 | 21 | 7 | 14 | | 10 | 11 | | 10 | 11 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| I | 18 | 12 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 0.87 | 12 | 6 | 0.343 | |
| II | 41 | 24 | 17 | | 21 | 20 | | 21 | 20 | |
| III | 31 | 9 | 22 | | 16 | 15 | | 14 | 17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 63 | 24 | 39 | 32 | 31 | 0.818 | 31 | 32 | 0.382 | ||
| 27 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 14 | 16 | 11 | ||||
LN lymph node, pTNM pathological tumor node metastasis, NLR, CD66+ neutrophil-to-CD8+ lymphocyte ratio, values in bold signify p < 0.05, aGrouped by median, bThe median.
Figure 1Representative examples of immunostaining of CD66b + neutrophils (in red) or CD8+ lymphocytes (in black) from intratumoral (A, B, C, D) or peritumoral (E, F, G, H) areas of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (x400). A, E infiltrated mainly by CD66b + neutrophils (black arrow); B, F infiltrated mainly by CD8+ lymphocytes (white arrow); C, G infiltrated by both CD66b + neutrophils and CD8+ lymphocytes; D, H infiltrated by low density of the inflammatory cells.
Correlation of peritumoral CD66+ neutrophils, CD8+ lymphocytes and NLR with clinicopathological parameters
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Male | 72 | 38 | 34 | 0.292 | 37 | 35 | 0.598 | 40 | 32 | |
| Female | 18 | 7 | 11 | | 8 | 10 | | 16 | 2 | |
| 42-78 | | | | | | | | | | |
| <60.5b | 45 | 25 | 20 | 0.292 | 25 | 20 | 0.292 | 27 | 18 | 0.664 |
| ≥60.5 | 45 | 20 | 25 | | 20 | 25 | | 29 | 16 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Upper | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0.612 | 6 | 4 | 0.769 | 6 | 4 | 0.634 |
| Middle | 48 | 25 | 23 | | 24 | 24 | | 28 | 20 | |
| Lower | 32 | 14 | 18 | | 15 | 17 | | 22 | 10 | |
| 0.5-8.5 | | | | | | | | | | |
| <4.0b | 52 | 18 | 26 | 0.092 | 20 | 24 | 0.399 | 30 | 14 | 0.254 |
| ≥4.0 | 38 | 27 | 19 | | 25 | 21 | | 26 | 20 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Well | 25 | 9 | 16 | 0.185 | 14 | 11 | 0.764 | 12 | 13 | 0.221 |
| Middle | 39 | 20 | 19 | | 19 | 20 | | 26 | 13 | |
| Poor | 26 | 16 | 10 | | 12 | 14 | | 18 | 8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 1 and 2 | 31 | 18 | 13 | 0.267 | 12 | 19 | 0.12 | 27 | 4 | |
| 3 and 4 | 59 | 27 | 32 | | 33 | 26 | | 29 | 30 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Negative | 57 | 27 | 30 | 0.512 | 26 | 31 | 0.274 | 40 | 17 | |
| Positive | 33 | 18 | 15 | | 19 | 14 | | 16 | 17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 0 | 57 | 27 | 30 | 0.764 | 26 | 31 | 40 | 17 | ||
| 1 | 12 | 7 | 5 | | 10 | 2 | | 3 | 9 | |
| ≥2 | 21 | 11 | 10 | | 9 | 12 | | 13 | 8 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| I | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0.972 | 8 | 10 | 0.536 | 13 | 5 | 0.053 |
| II | 41 | 21 | 20 | | 19 | 22 | | 29 | 12 | |
| III | 31 | 15 | 16 | | 18 | 13 | | 14 | 17 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| 63 | 31 | 32 | 0.818 | 32 | 31 | 0.818 | 38 | 25 | 0.569 | |
| 27 | 14 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 18 | 9 | ||||
LN lymph node, pTNM pathological tumor node metastasis, NLR CD66+ neutrophil-to-CD8+ lymphocyte ratio, values in bold signify p < 0.05, aGrouped by median, bThe median.
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier analysis of intratumoral CD66b + neutrophils of 90 patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Increased intratumoral neutrophils were significantly associated with decreased disease-free survival (A) and overall survival (B).
Univariate analysis of clinicopathological and immunohistochemical parameters
| 1.182 (0.64-2.185) | 0.593 | 1.154 (0.608-2.19) | 0.661 | |
| 1.092 (0.665-1.793) | 0.727 | 1.27 (0.753-2.144) | 0.37 | |
| | | | | |
| Upper | Ref. | 0.213 | Ref. | 0.6 |
| Middle | 0.517 (0.2554-1.202) | 0.083 | 0.653 (0.286-1.493) | 0.312 |
| Lower | 0.553 (0.545-1.608) | 0.135 | 0.698 (0.296-1.65) | 0.413 |
| 1.172 (0.715-1.923) | 0.529 | 1.343 (0.797-2.262) | 0.269 | |
| | | | | |
| Well | Ref. | 0.095 | Ref. | 0.17 |
| Moderate | 1.947 (1.045-3.629) | 1.881 (0.971-3.645) | 0.061 | |
| Poor | 1.334 (0.666-2.672) | 0.417 | 1.449 (0.697-3.015) | 0.321 |
| | | | | |
| T1 | Ref. | 0.121 | Ref. | |
| T2 | 1.359 (0.539-3.454) | 0.519 | 1.425 (0.477-4.253) | 0.526 |
| T3 | 1.954 (0.871-4.385) | 0.104 | 2.706 (1.061-6.9) | |
| T4 | 3.328 (1.113-9.951) | 4.618 (1.404-15.196) | ||
| 2.506 (1.51-4.157) | 2.469 (1.455-4.188) | |||
| | | | | |
| 0 | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| 1 | 3.479 (1.756-6.89) | 3.01891.491-6.112 | ||
| ≥2 | 2.117 (1.176-3.812) | 2.20391.195-4.063 | ||
| | | | | |
| I | Ref. | Ref. | ||
| II | 2.03 (0.919-4.482) | 0.08 | 2.334 (0.951-5.729) | 0.064 |
| III | 4.365 (1.962-9.713) | 5.254 (2.139-12.91) | ||
| | | | | |
| Surgery alone | Ref. | 0.081 | Ref. | 0.063 |
| Adjuvant chemotherapy | 0.839 (0.354-1.993) | 0.692 | 0.747 (0.291-1.919) | 0.545 |
| Adjuvant radiation | 1.821 (0.961-3.451) | 0.066 | 1.99 (1.04-3.807) | |
| Adjuvant chemoradiation | 2.152 (0.992-4.67) | 0.053 | 2.054 (0.902-4.676) | 0.086 |
| | | | | |
| Intratumoral neutrophils | 2.505 (1.496-4.196) | 2.559 (1.487-4.406) | ||
| Intratumoral CD8+ lymphocytes | 0.896 (0.546-1.471) | 0.665 | 0.959 (0.57-1.613) | 0.875 |
| Intratumoral NLR | 1.279 (0.78-2.097) | 0.329 | 1.316 (0.783-2.214) | 0.3 |
| Peritumoral neutrophils | 1.035 (0.63-1.7) | 0.893 | 1.119 (0.664-1.886) | 0.672 |
| Peritumoral CD8+ lymphocytes | 0.952 (0.581-1.561) | 0.846 | 1.032 (0.613-1.735) | 0.907 |
| Peritumoral NLR | 1.306 (0.788-2.165) | 0.3 | 1.292 (0.761-2.195) | 0.343 |
LN lymph node, pTNM pathological tumor node metastasis, NLR CD66+ neutrophil-to-CD8+ lymphocyte ratio, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, Ref. reference, Values in bold signify p < 0.05.
Independent predictors for survival by multivariate analysis
| Disease-free survival | | | |
| Tumor location | Upper vs. middle and lower | 0.474 (0.228-0.987) | 0.046 |
| pTNM stage | I, II vs. III | 1.892 (1.104-3.241) | 0.02 |
| Intratumoral neutrophils | <18.5 vs. ≥18.5 | 2.174 (1.249-3.784) | 0.006 |
| Overall survival | | | |
| pTNM stage | I, II vs. III | 2.122 (1.205-3.736) | 0.009 |
| Treatment regimens | Surgery alone vs. Adjuvant radiation | 1.855 (1.061-3.244) | 0.03 |
| Intratumoral neutrophils | <18.5 vs. ≥18.5 | 1.858 (1.038-3.325) | 0.037 |
pTNM pathological tumor node metastasis, HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval.