| Literature DB >> 22442706 |
Jing-jing Zhao1, Ke Pan, Wei Wang, Ju-gao Chen, Yan-heng Wu, Lin Lv, Jian-jun Li, Yi-bing Chen, Dan-dan Wang, Qiu-zhong Pan, Xiao-dong Li, Jian-chuan Xia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several pieces of evidence indicate that tumor-infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) are correlated to tumor progression. In the current study, we explore the relationship between TINs and clinicopathological features of gastric adenocarcinoma patients. Furthermore, we investigated the prognostic value of TINs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was comprised of two groups, training group (115 patients) and test group (97 patients). Biomarkers (intratumoral CD15+ neutrophils) were assessed by immunohistochemistry. The relationship between clinicopathological features and patient outcome were evaluated using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22442706 PMCID: PMC3307751 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The level of CD15+ tumor-infiltrating neutrophils (TINs) in gastric adenocarcinoma surgical specimens shown by immunohistochemistry.
(A), (B), (E) and (F): High density of CD15+ TINs. (C), (D), (G) and (H): Low density of CD15+ TINs. Original magnification: A–D×200; E–H×400.
Relationship between CD15+TINs and clinicopathological features of gastric adenocarcinoma patients in the training group.
| Clinicopathologic variables | number of each group | CD15+TINs |
| |
| low | high | |||
|
| 115 | 57 | 58 | |
|
| 0.928 | |||
| <60 | 59 | 29 | 30 | |
| ≧60 | 56 | 28 | 28 | |
|
| 0.092 | |||
| Male | 74 | 41 | 33 | |
| Female | 41 | 16 | 25 | |
|
| 0.191 | |||
| <4 | 32 | 19 | 13 | |
| ≧4 | 83 | 38 | 45 | |
|
| 0.823 | |||
| T1–T2 | 17 | 8 | 9 | |
| T3–T4 | 98 | 49 | 49 | |
|
| 0.028 | |||
| I–II | 43 | 27 | 16 | |
| III–IV | 72 | 30 | 42 | |
|
| 0.024 | |||
| N0 | 37 | 24 | 13 | |
| N1–N3 | 78 | 33 | 45 | |
|
| 0.004 | |||
| no | 107 | 57 | 50 | |
| yes | 8 | 0 | 8 | |
|
| 0.322 | |||
| well | 27 | 10 | 7 | |
| moderate | 29 | 16 | 13 | |
| poor | 59 | 31 | 28 | |
p value<0.05.
Figure 2The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of gastric adenocarcinoma patients (n = 115) in the training group with a low density of CD15+ TINs (n = 57) and a high density of CD15+ TINs (n = 58).
Based on the median number of CD15+ TINs (21.60 cells/HPF) in the 115 cases, the patients were divided into two groups: high CD15+ TINs group (≧21.60 cells/HPF) and low CD15+ TINs group CD15+ TINs (<21.60 cells/HPF). The survival rate of patients with a high density of CD15+ infiltrating neutrophils was significantly lower than that of patients with a low density of CD15+ infiltrating neutrophils (Log rank test, p = 0.002).
Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival in gastric adenocarcinoma patients in the training group.
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
| HR | 95% CI |
| HR | 95% CI |
| |
| CD15+TINs (lowvhigh) | 2.296 | 1.317–4.001 | 0.003 | 1.943 | 1.079–3.497 | 0.027 |
| Age (<60 v≧60) | 1.258 | 0.744–2.127 | 0.846 | |||
| Gender (malevfemale) | 0.687 | 0.522–1.525 | 0.676 | |||
| Tumor size (<4 cmv≧4 cm) | 2.392 | 1.170–4.890 | 0.017 | 1.068 | 0.491–2.324 | 0.869 |
| Depth of invasion(T1-T2vT3-T4) | 6.402 | 1.559–26.289 | 0.010 | 4.529 | 1.065–19.263 | 0.041 |
| Lymph node metastasis(N0vN1-N4) | 4.756 | 2.147–10.538 | <0.001 | 2.973 | 1.234–7.162 | 0.015 |
| Distance metastasis(novyes) | 4.032 | 0.791–2.551 | <0.001 | 2.306 | 1.039–5.118 | 0.040 |
| Histologic grade(well/moderate/poor) | 1.079 | 0.782–1.489 | 0.644 | |||
HR Hazard ratio, CI confidence interval.
p value<0.05.
Figure 3The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of gastric adenocarcinoma patients (n = 97) in the test group with a low density of CD15+ TINs (n = 52) and a high density of CD15+ TINs (n = 45).
The patients were divided into high CD15+ TINs group (≧21.60 cells/HPF) and low CD15+ TINs group (<21.60 cells/HPF) according to the median density of CD15+ TINs (21.60 cells/HPF), which was obtained from the training group. Log-rank test shows that the patients with the high density of CD15+ TINs showed significantly poorer prognosis than those with the low density of CD15+ TINs (p = 0.032).
Clinical characteristics of gastric adenocarcinoma patients in the training group and test group.
| Characteristics | Training Group (%) | Test Group (%) |
|
|
| 0.090 | ||
| <60 | 59 (51.3) | 61 (62.9) | |
| ≧60 | 56 (48.7) | 36 (37.1) | |
|
| 0.496 | ||
| Male | 74 (64.3) | 58 (59.8) | |
| Female | 41 (35.7) | 39 (40.2) | |
|
| 0.737 | ||
| <4 | 32 (27.8) | 25 (25.8) | |
| ≧4 | 83 (72.2) | 72 (74.2) | |
|
| 0.675 | ||
| T1 | 5 (4.4) | 3 (3.1) | |
| T2 | 12 (10.4) | 6 (6.2) | |
| T3 | 25 (21.7) | 23 (23.7) | |
| T4 | 73 (63.5) | 65 (67.0) | |
|
| 0.734 | ||
| N0 | 37 (32.2) | 25 (25.8) | |
| N1 | 20 (17.4) | 21 (21.6) | |
| N2 | 24 (20.9) | 21 (21.6) | |
| N3 | 34 (29.5) | 30 (31.0) | |
|
| 0.075 | ||
| M0 | 107 (93.0) | 83 (85.6) | |
| M1 | 8 (7.0) | 14 (14.4) | |
|
| 0.366 | ||
| I | 13 (11.3) | 7 (7.2) | |
| II | 30 (26.1) | 23 (23.7) | |
| III | 63 (54.8) | 53 (54.7) | |
| IV | 9 (7.8) | 14 (14.4) | |
|
| 0.046 | ||
| Well | 27 (23.5) | 14 (14.4) | |
| Moderate | 29 (25.2) | 17 (17.5) | |
| Poor | 59 (51.3) | 66 (68.1) | |
|
| 0.573 | ||
| No | 59 (51.3) | 46 (47.4) | |
| Yes | 56 (48.7) | 51 (52.6) |