Literature DB >> 24395094

Revealing human inductive biases for category learning by simulating cultural transmission.

Kevin R Canini1, Thomas L Griffiths, Wolf Vanpaemel, Michael L Kalish.   

Abstract

We explored people's inductive biases in category learning--that is, the factors that make learning category structures easy or hard--using iterated learning. This method uses the responses of one participant to train the next, simulating cultural transmission and converging on category structures that people find easy to learn. We applied this method to four different stimulus sets, varying in the identifiability of their underlying dimensions. The results of iterated learning provide an unusually clear picture of people's inductive biases. The category structures that emerge often correspond to a linear boundary on a single dimension, when such a dimension can be identified. However, other kinds of category structures also appear, depending on the nature of the stimuli. The results from this single experiment are consistent with previous empirical findings that were gleaned from decades of research into human category learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24395094     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0556-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  23 in total

1.  On the dominance of unidimensional rules in unsupervised categorization.

Authors:  F G Ashby; S Queller; P M Berretty
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1999-08

2.  Language evolution by iterated learning with bayesian agents.

Authors:  Thomas L Griffiths; Michael L Kalish
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-05-06

3.  DISCRIMINABILITY AND PREFERENCE FOR ATTRIBUTES IN FREE AND CONSTRAINED CLASSIFICATION.

Authors:  S IMAI; W R GARNER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1965-06

4.  The influence of stimulus properties on category construction.

Authors:  Fraser Milton; A J Wills
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  In search of abstraction: the varying abstraction model of categorization.

Authors:  Wolf Vanpaemel; Gert Storms
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-08

6.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1986-03

7.  Decision rules in the perception and categorization of multidimensional stimuli.

Authors:  F G Ashby; R E Gott
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning.

Authors:  R M Nosofsky; T J Palmeri; S C McKinley
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensional acoustic categories.

Authors:  Martijn Goudbeek; Daniel Swingley; Roel Smits
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  SUSTAIN: a network model of category learning.

Authors:  Bradley C Love; Douglas L Medin; Todd M Gureckis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  3 in total

1.  Determining informative priors for cognitive models.

Authors:  Michael D Lee; Wolf Vanpaemel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

2.  Human biases limit cumulative innovation.

Authors:  Bill Thompson; Thomas L Griffiths
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Selection, adaptation, inheritance and design in human culture: the view from the Price equation.

Authors:  Daniel Nettle
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 6.237

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.