Literature DB >> 2439311

Task difficulty, probability, and inter-stimulus interval as determinants of P300 from auditory stimuli.

J Polich.   

Abstract

The P300 event-related potential was elicited with auditory stimuli in 4 experiments which manipulated combinations of stimulus target probability (10% vs. 30%), task difficulty (easy vs. hard), and inter-stimulus interval (5 sec vs. 2 sec). P300 amplitude was smaller and peak latency longer for the more difficult relative to the easier tasks across experiments. Increases in stimulus target probability generally diminished P300 amplitude and shortened peak latency more for the easy relative to difficult task conditions. Increasing the number of non-target stimulus tones decreased P300 amplitude reliably, but increased latency only slightly. Task difficulty did not interact with variations in inter-stimulus interval which produced generally weak effects for both amplitude and latency. These findings suggest that P300 amplitude and latency obtained from auditory discrimination paradigms reflect processing difficulty independently of stimulus target probability unless differences in task requirements affect stimulus encoding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 2439311     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(87)90052-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  69 in total

1.  The effect of background noise on P300 to suprathreshold stimuli.

Authors:  Dean F Salisbury; Massimo A Desantis; Martha E Shenton; Robert W McCarley
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  The NoGo P300 'anteriorization' effect and response inhibition.

Authors:  Dean F Salisbury; Carlye B Griggs; Martha E Shenton; Robert W McCarley
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Differential influences of exercise intensity on information processing in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Keita Kamijo; Yoshiaki Nishihira; Arihiro Hatta; Takeshi Kaneda; Toshiaki Wasaka; Tetsuo Kida; Kazuo Kuroiwa
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-04-09       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Event-related potentials to changes of rhythmic unit: differences between musicians and nonmusicians.

Authors:  Pekcan Ungan; Türev Berki; Nurhan Erbil; Suha Yagcioglu; Mehmet Yüksel; Rezzan Utkucal
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 3.307

5.  Modulation of the conflict monitoring intensity: the role of aversive reinforcement, cognitive demand, and trait-BIS.

Authors:  Anja Leue; Sebastian Lange; André Beauducel
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  From ERPs to Academics.

Authors:  Charles H Hillman; Matthew B Pontifex; Robert W Motl; Kevin C O'Leary; Christopher R Johnson; Mark R Scudder; Lauren B Raine; Darla M Castelli
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 6.464

7.  Does the 'P300' speller depend on eye gaze?

Authors:  P Brunner; S Joshi; S Briskin; J R Wolpaw; H Bischof; G Schalk
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2010-09-21       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 8.  Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b.

Authors:  John Polich
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Psychopathy, attention, and oddball target detection: New insights from PCL-R facet scores.

Authors:  Nathaniel E Anderson; Vaughn R Steele; J Michael Maurer; Edward M Bernat; Kent A Kiehl
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 4.016

10.  Bayesian approach to dynamically controlling data collection in P300 spellers.

Authors:  Chandra S Throckmorton; Kenneth A Colwell; David B Ryan; Eric W Sellers; Leslie M Collins
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.