Literature DB >> 24392420

The adoption of new endodontic technology by Indian dental practitioners: a questionnaire survey.

Ruchi Gupta1, Rochna Rai2.   

Abstract

AIM: To ascertain the adoption of new endodontic technology in general dental practice in India in 2011.
METHODOLOGY: A postal questionnaire survey comprising 26 questions was sent to 700 general dental practitioners. The questions covered professional activity, root canal preparation and instrumentation, choice of irrigants and intracanal medicaments, choice of obturation techniques and other aspects of endodontics. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Chi-square (χ(2)) test at 0.05 level of significance.
RESULTS: The overall response rate was 88%. The results showed that rubber dams were used by 27% of dental practitioners in India. The most widely used irrigant was sodium hypochlorite, which was used by 33% of the respondents. Thirty nine percent of the practitioners were still incorporating only hand files during the cleaning and shaping phase of treatment. The technique of choice was both step back and crown down (35%). Calcium hydroxide was found to be the most frequently used (62%) intracanal medicament. Lateral condensation with guttapercha (61%) was the most common method used for obturation. Majority used zinc oxide eugenol as a sealer (55%). The post obturation restoration was done mostly by composite material (46%). Most of the respondents placed crowns after root canal treatment. Digital radiography was reported as being used by 17% of the respondents. There was no difference between males and females with respect to the incorporation of new technologies in dentistry. They had been incorporated significantly more by respondents who held postgraduate qualifications and had professional activities of <5 years.
CONCLUSION: The results indicated that new endodontic technology and materials are slowly being incorporated in clinical practice of endodontics in India. This survey shows the importance of continuing dental education for practitioners to update their knowledge.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endodontics; General dental practitioner; Ni-Ti instruments; Obturation; Root canal treatment; Survey

Year:  2013        PMID: 24392420      PMCID: PMC3879893          DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5817.3628

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res        ISSN: 0973-709X


  19 in total

1.  A study of endodontic treatment carried out in dental practice within the UK.

Authors:  S M Jenkins; S J Hayes; P M Dummer
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.264

2.  Root canal treatment in general practice in Sudan.

Authors:  M F Ahmed; A I Elseed; Y E Ibrahim
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.264

3.  A survey of endodontic practice amongst Flemish dentists.

Authors:  G Slaus; P Bottenberg
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.264

4.  Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient.

Authors:  J Y Blum; P Machtou; C Ruddle; J P Micallef
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Effect of educational intervention on adoption of new endodontic technology by general dental practitioners: a questionnaire survey.

Authors:  M Koch; H G Eriksson; S Axelsson; A Tegelberg
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2009-02-07       Impact factor: 5.264

Review 6.  Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: a review.

Authors:  I A Ahmad
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.264

7.  Why do general dental practitioners refer to a specific specialist endodontist in practice?

Authors:  J J Barnes; S Patel; F Mannocci
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 5.264

8.  Endodontic treatment in Nigeria.

Authors:  E S Akpata
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 5.264

9.  Quality-Shaping Factors and Endodontic Treatment amongst General Dental Practitioners with a Focus on Denmark.

Authors:  Sune Demant; Merete Markvart; Lars Bjørndal
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2012-03-26

10.  An investigation of current endodontic practice in Turkey.

Authors:  R F Kaptan; F Haznedaroglu; M B Kayahan; F B Basturk
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2012-12-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Representative survey on the reprocessing of endodontic instruments in Germany.

Authors:  D Sonntag; E Martin; W H M Raab
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Frequency and Influencing Factors of Rubber Dam Usage in Tianjin: A Questionnaire Survey.

Authors:  Huiru Zou; Yanni Li; Xiaoli Lian; Yan Yan; Xiaohua Dai; Guanhua Wang
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2016-07-31

Review 3.  Clinical studies on core-carrier obturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amy Wai-Yee Wong; Shinan Zhang; Samantha Kar-Yan Li; Chengfei Zhang; Chun-Hung Chu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  An insight into patient's perceptions regarding root canal treatment: A questionnaire-based survey.

Authors:  Ramta Bansal; Aditya Jain
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-02-28

5.  Endodontic practice amongst Nigerian dentists undergoing postgraduate training.

Authors:  Shakeerah Olaide Gbadebo; Deborah Mojirade Ajayi
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2021-07-28

6.  Endodontic Tendencies in a Very-Low-Income Population Area of Northeastern Brazil.

Authors:  Maria Tereza Pedrosa Albuquerque; Joice Velames Silva; David Junio Oliveira Poppe; Crislaine Santana Santos; Tainá Pires Santos; Eliseu Aldrigh Münchow; Juliana Yuri Nagata
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2019-09-05

Review 7.  Bioactive Glass-Based Endodontic Sealer as a Promising Root Canal Filling Material without Semisolid Core Materials.

Authors:  Ayako Washio; Takahiko Morotomi; Shinji Yoshii; Chiaki Kitamura
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.623

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.