| Literature DB >> 31582980 |
Maria Tereza Pedrosa Albuquerque1, Joice Velames Silva2, David Junio Oliveira Poppe1, Crislaine Santana Santos2, Tainá Pires Santos1, Eliseu Aldrigh Münchow3, Juliana Yuri Nagata2.
Abstract
AIM: To gather information regarding endodontic treatment protocols and continuing education attendance of dentists in some cities located in Northeastern Brazil (Sergipe and Bahia States), a region that comprises a very-low-income population.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31582980 PMCID: PMC6748203 DOI: 10.1155/2019/9543593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Dent ISSN: 1687-8728
Sociodemographic and professional qualification of dentists who participated in the study (n = 199).
| Frequency (%) | |
|---|---|
| Gender | |
| Female | 59.8 |
| Male | 40.2 |
| Age (years) | |
| 20–30 | 42.2 |
| 31–40 | 31.6 |
| 41–50 | 15.6 |
| >50 | 10.6 |
| Graduation school | |
| Public | 57.8 |
| Private | 42.2 |
| Years of practice | |
| 1–5 | 38.7 |
| 6–10 | 23.6 |
| 11–15 | 12.1 |
| 16–20 | 7.5 |
| >20 | 18.1 |
| Endodontics education | |
| Longer programs (PhD, MSc) | 47 |
| Shorter programs | 28.5 |
| None | 24.5 |
| Qualification in the last 2 years | |
| Yes | 73.9 |
| No | 26.1 |
Routine endodontic practice by dentists in Bahia and Sergipe, Brazil.
| Frequency (%) | |
|---|---|
| Use of rubber dam | |
| Always | 75.9 |
| Sometimes | 19.6 |
| Never | 4.5 |
| Type of anesthesic | |
| Lidocaine | 67.8 |
| Articaine | 17.1 |
| Mepivacaine | 11.6 |
| Lidocaine + articaine | 5 |
| Lidocaine + mepivacaine | 5 |
| Mepivacaine + articaine | 4 |
| Lidocaine + mepivacaine + articaine | 2 |
| Others | 18.1 |
| Preparation technique | |
| Crown-down | 83.9 |
| Step-back | 16.1 |
| Instruments | |
| Hand endodontic files | 86.9 |
| Gates-glidden burs | 67.3 |
| Apical locator | 62.8 |
| Rotary endodontic files | 58.3 |
| Others | 32.7 |
| Type of rotary file | |
| Reciprocating files | 53.3 |
| Protaper file | 41.7 |
| Easy ProDesign | 21.6 |
| MTwo system | 5.5 |
| Easy logic | 14.58 |
| Easy reciprocating | 4.5 |
| Twisted file | 1 |
| i-race (FKG) | 0.5 |
| Irrigant solution | |
| NaOCl | 90.4 |
| EDTA | 84.9 |
| Saline solution | 25.1 |
| Chlorhexidine | 10 |
| Hydrogen peroxide | 5 |
| Others | 6 |
| Intracanal medicament | |
| Ca(OH)2 | 74.3 |
| PMCC | 54.3 |
| Otosporin | 30.2 |
| Tricresol | 17.6 |
| Formocresol | 14.6 |
| NaOCl | 11.6 |
| Others | 16.6 |
| Timing of intracanal medicament | |
| 1–3 days | 5 |
| 4–7 days | 50.3 |
| >7 days | 44.2 |
| No answer | 0.5 |
Crude prevalence ratios (PRs) for factors associated with dentists that performed a Continuous Education Program in Endodontics, from cities of Sergipe and Bahia, Brazil (n = 199). Poisson regression analysis (p < 0.05).
| Independent variable | Continuous education, | PR (IC 95%) |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No | Yes | |||
| Graduation school | ||||
| Public | 27 (13.6) | 88 (44.2) | 1 | 0.664 |
| Private | 22 (11.1) | 62 (31.2) | 0.97 (0.82–1.14) | |
|
| ||||
| Years since graduation | ||||
| >20 | 7 (3.5) | 29 (14.6) | 1 | 0.008 |
| 16–20 | 1 (0.5) | 14 (7.0) | 1.16 (0.94–1.43) | |
| 11–15 | 3 (1.5) | 21 (10.6) | 1.09 (0.87–1.35) | |
| 6–10 | 9 (4.5) | 38 (19.1) | 1.00 (0.81–1.24) | |
| 1–5 | 29 (14.6) | 48 (24.1) | 0.77 (0.61–0.98) | |
|
| ||||
| Perform RCT using the rotary system | ||||
| No | 43 (21.6) | 53 (26.6) | 1 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 6 (3.0) | 97 (48.7) | 1.71 (1.42–2.01) | |
|
| ||||
| Endodontic qualification in the last 2 years | ||||
| No | 15 (7.5) | 37 (18.6) | 1 | 0.436 |
| Yes | 34 (17.1) | 113 (56.8) | 1.08 (0.89–1.31) | |
|
| ||||
| Perform RCT using rubber dam isolation | ||||
| Never | 4 (2.0) | 5 (2.5) | 1 | 0.005 |
| Always | 26 (13.1) | 125 (62.8) | 1.49 (0.83–2.69) | |
| Sometimes | 19 (9.5) | 20 (10.1) | 0.92 (0.48–1.79) | |
|
| ||||
| Perform RCT of necrotic teeth with periapical lesion in one appointment | ||||
| No | 47 (23.6) | 111 (55.8) | 1 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 2 (1.0) | 39 (19.6) | 1.35 (1.20–1.53) | |
|
| ||||
| Perform RCT of necrotic teeth without periapical lesion in one appointment | ||||
| No | 40 (20.1) | 69 (34.7) | 1 | <0.001 |
| Yes | 9 (4.5) | 81 (40.7) | 1.42 (1.21–1.67) | |
|
| ||||
| Total time used to perform RCT of incisive teeth in one appointment | ||||
| Do not perform | 17 (8.5) | 8 (4.0) | ||
| ≤30 min | 9 (4.5) | 35 (17.6) | 1 | 0.560 |
| 30–60 min | 19 (9.5) | 87 (43.7) | 1.49 (0.72–3.10) | |
| 60–90 min | 2 (1.0) | 17 (8.5) | 1.37 (0.67–2.81) | |
| >90 min | 2 (1.0) | 3 (1.5) | 1.33 (0.64–2.75) | |
|
| ||||
| Total time used to perform RCT of premolar teeth in one appointment | ||||
| Do not perform | 21 (10.6) | 14 (7.0) | ||
| ≤30 min | 1 (0.5) | 15 (7.5) | 1 | 0.281 |
| 30–60 min | 14 (7.0) | 73 (36.7) | 1.10 (0.75–1.62) | |
| 60–90 min | 10 (5.0) | 40 (20.1) | 1.15 (0.79–1.68) | |
| >90 min | 3 (1.5) | 8 (4.0) | 1.29 (0.88–1.89) | |
|
| ||||
| Total time used to perform RCT of molar teeth in one appointment | ||||
| Do not perform | 27 (13.6) | 18 (9.0) | ||
| ≤30 min | 0 (0.0) | 1 (0.5) | 1 | <0.001 |
| 30–60 min | 1 (0.5) | 28 (14.1) | 1.28 (1.07–1.52) | |
| 60–90 min | 5 (2.5) | 61 (30.7) | 1.33 (1.12–1.59) | |
| >90 min | 16 (8.0) | 42 (21.1) | 1.38 (1.18–1.62) | |
|
| ||||
| Number of complications by performing RCT in one appointment | ||||
| More than three | 37 (18.6) | 89 (44.7) | 1 | <0.001 |
| Up to two | 10 (5.0) | 32 (16.1) | 0.93 (0.76–1.14) | |
| None | 2 (1.0) | 29 (14.6) | 1.23 (1.01–1.49) | |
RCT: root canal therapy.