Literature DB >> 27173705

Representative survey on the reprocessing of endodontic instruments in Germany.

D Sonntag1, E Martin1, W H M Raab1.   

Abstract

Aim The aim of the study was to review the implementation of hygiene guidelines for the reprocessing of endodontic files in a representative survey and to determine the time needed for the procedure.Methods A questionnaire with nine items was sent to 4,000 German dentists. In addition to obtaining personal information, it asked for the total time required for the reprocessing of instruments and contained specific questions about the cleaning procedure in order to assess whether the requirements of the German Federal Ministry of Health, as defined by the Robert Koch Institute, were complied with. Approval by the Ethics Committee was obtained. The data were analysed statistically using the Chi-square test and Cramer's V as a measurement of effect size.Results The response rate was 29.4% (n = 1,177/4,000). On 59 questionnaires, answers to several questions were missing; 1,118 questionnaires (28.0%) could be included in the evaluation. With effect sizes between 0.12 and 0.21, the survey could be classified as statistically representative of German dentists in terms of age and gender. The guidelines were adhered to by 31.7% (n = 354/1118) of respondents, while 68.3% (n = 764/1118) adhered to them either not fully, or not at all (P < 0.001). There were no significant differences in adherence to guidelines between younger (up to 44 years) and older (45 years and above) dentists (P = 0.31) or between women and men (P = 0.194). The reported time for cleaning a patient-related instrument set was more than nine minutes for 68.1% of respondents, not including the time needed for sterilisation; 5% of respondents treated files as single-use instruments.Conclusions The guidelines of the German Federal Ministry of Health for cleaning, disinfecting and sterilising endodontic files are widely disregarded in Germany. The designation and use of endodontic files as single-use instruments should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27173705     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  26 in total

1.  Consequences of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey.

Authors:  S Keeter; C Miller; A Kohut; R M Groves; S Presser
Journal:  Public Opin Q       Date:  2000

2.  A SEM evaluation of debris removal from endodontic files after cleaning and steam sterilization procedures.

Authors:  D A Van Eldik; P S Zilm; A H Rogers; P D Marin
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.291

3.  A study of visual and blood contamination on reprocessed endodontic files from general dental practice.

Authors:  S Letters; A J Smith; S McHugh; J Bagg
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  [Hygiene requirements for the reprocessing of medical devices. Recommendation of the Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Prevention (KRINKO) at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI) and the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM)].

Authors: 
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  The availability and content of dental instrument manufacturers' decontamination information.

Authors:  E M Roebuck; R Strang; I Green; A Smith; J Walker
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 1.626

6.  Changes in compliance with recommended infection control practices and affecting factors among dentists in Taiwan.

Authors:  Hsin-Chung Cheng; Chen-Yi Su; Chiung-Fang Huang; Chi-Yu Chuang
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Why do general dental practitioners refer to a specific specialist endodontist in practice?

Authors:  J J Barnes; S Patel; F Mannocci
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2010-08-31       Impact factor: 5.264

Review 8.  Iatrogenic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease via surgical instruments.

Authors:  Jonathan G Thomas; Carol E Chenoweth; Stephen E Sullivan
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 1.961

9.  Bioassay studies support the potential for iatrogenic transmission of variant Creutzfeldt Jakob Disease through dental procedures.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kirby; Joanne Dickinson; Matthew Vassey; Mike Dennis; Mark Cornwall; Neil McLeod; Andrew Smith; Philip D Marsh; James T Walker; J Mark Sutton; Neil D H Raven
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of reprocessing medical devices in 14 German regional hospitals and at 27 medical practitioners' offices within the European context - consequences for European harmonization.

Authors:  Birgit Thiede; Axel Kramer
Journal:  GMS Hyg Infect Control       Date:  2013-11-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Effect of Sterilization on Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Proflexendo Endodontic Rotary Files.

Authors:  Emad O Alshwaimi
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2019-02-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.