BACKGROUND: Breakthrough Series Collaboratives addressing chronic conditions have been conducted at the national level and in single health care delivery systems but not at the state level. Two state-level collaboratives were conducted: Diabetes Collaborative I (October 1999-November 2000) included 17 clinic teams from across the state, and Diabetes Collaborative II (February 2001-March 2002) included 30 teams and 6 health plans. METHODS: Both collaboratives took place in Washington State, where a diverse group of primary care practices participated, and health insurance plans partnered with the clinic teams. Teams individually tested and implement changes in their systems of care to address all components of the Chronic Care Model. RESULTS: All 47 teams completed the collaboratives, and all but one maintained a registry throughout the 13 months. Most teams demonstrated some amount of improvement on process and outcome measures that addressed blood sugar testing and control, blood pressure control, lipid testing and control, foot exams, dilated eye exams, and self-management goals. CONCLUSION: The benefits of holding collaboratives more locally include increased technical support and increased participation, translating into wider implementation of prevention-focused, patient-centered care.
BACKGROUND: Breakthrough Series Collaboratives addressing chronic conditions have been conducted at the national level and in single health care delivery systems but not at the state level. Two state-level collaboratives were conducted: Diabetes Collaborative I (October 1999-November 2000) included 17 clinic teams from across the state, and Diabetes Collaborative II (February 2001-March 2002) included 30 teams and 6 health plans. METHODS: Both collaboratives took place in Washington State, where a diverse group of primary care practices participated, and health insurance plans partnered with the clinic teams. Teams individually tested and implement changes in their systems of care to address all components of the Chronic Care Model. RESULTS: All 47 teams completed the collaboratives, and all but one maintained a registry throughout the 13 months. Most teams demonstrated some amount of improvement on process and outcome measures that addressed blood sugar testing and control, blood pressure control, lipid testing and control, foot exams, dilated eye exams, and self-management goals. CONCLUSION: The benefits of holding collaboratives more locally include increased technical support and increased participation, translating into wider implementation of prevention-focused, patient-centered care.
Authors: Jacqueline R Halladay; Darren A DeWalt; Alison Wise; Bahjat Qaqish; Kristin Reiter; Shoou-Yih Lee; Ann Lefebvre; Kimberly Ward; C Madeline Mitchell; Katrina E Donahue Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2014 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Cynthia D Connelly; Mary J Baker-Ericzen; Andrea L Hazen; John Landsverk; Sarah McCue Horwitz Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Richard O White; Rosette James Chakkalakal; Kenneth A Wallston; Kathleen Wolff; Becky Gregory; Dianne Davis; David Schlundt; Karen M Trochez; Shari Barto; Laura A Harris; Aihua Bian; Jonathan S Schildcrout; Sunil Kripalani; Russell L Rothman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-01-09 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Gillian L Schauer; Terry Bush; Barbara Cerutti; Lisa Mahoney; Juliet R Thompson; Susan M Zbikowski Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Andrew R Quanbeck; David H Gustafson; James H Ford; Alice Pulvermacher; Michael T French; K John McConnell; Dennis McCarty Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-04-27 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Todd Molfenter; Thomasine Heitkamp; Ann A Murphy; Stephanie Tapscott; Stephanie Behlman; Olivia J Cody Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2021-06-24