Literature DB >> 24390274

Clinical and Demographic Factors Associated With Receipt of Non Guideline-concordant Initial Therapy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer.

Ann S Hamilton1, Steven T Fleming, Dian Wang, Michael Goodman, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Jean B Owen, Mary Lo, Alex Ho, Roger T Anderson, Trevor Thompson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which initial therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer was concordant with nationally recognized guidelines using supplemented cancer registry data and what factors were associated with receipt of nonguideline-concordant care.
METHODS: Initial therapy for 8229 nonmetastatic prostate cancer cases diagnosed in 2004 from cancer registries in 7 states was abstracted as part of the Centers for Disease Control's Patterns of Care Breast and Prostate Cancer study conducted during 2007 to 2009. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines version 1.2002 was used as the standard of care based on recurrence risk group and life expectancy (LE). A multivariable model was used to determine risk factors associated with receipt of nonguideline-concordant care.
RESULTS: Nearly 80% with nonmetastatic prostate cancer received guideline-concordant care for initial therapy. Receipt of nonguideline-concordant care (including receiving either less aggressive therapy or more aggressive therapy than indicated) was related to older age, African American race/ethnicity, being unmarried, rural residence, and especially to being in the high recurrence risk group where receiving less aggressive therapy than indicated occurred more often than receiving more aggressive therapy (adjusted OR=4.2; 95% CL, 3.5-5.2 vs. low-risk group). Compared with life table estimates adjusted for comorbidity, physicians tended to underestimate LE.
CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of less aggressive therapy than indicated among high-risk group men with >5-year LE based on life table estimates adjusted for comorbidity was a concern. Physicians may tend to underestimate 5-year survival among this group and should be alerted to the importance of recommending aggressive therapy when warranted. However, based on more recent guidelines, among those with low-risk disease, the proportion considered to be receiving less aggressive therapy than indicated may now be lower because active surveillance is now considered appropriate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 24390274      PMCID: PMC4514560          DOI: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  19 in total

Review 1.  Nonmedical factors in treatment selection.

Authors:  Otis W Brawley
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.241

2.  The impact of underreported Veterans Affairs data on national cancer statistics: analysis using population-based SEER registries.

Authors:  Nadia Howlader; Lynn A Ries; David G Stinchcomb; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 3.  National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Douglas Scherr; Peter W Swindle; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Survival associated with treatment vs observation of localized prostate cancer in elderly men.

Authors:  Yu-Ning Wong; Nandita Mitra; Gary Hudes; Russell Localio; J Sanford Schwartz; Fei Wan; Chantal Montagnet; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Treatment patterns for prostate cancer: comparison of Medicare claims data to medical record review.

Authors:  Steven T Fleming; Ann S Hamilton; Susan A Sabatino; Gretchen G Kimmick; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Jean B Owen; Bin Huang; Wenke Hwang
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Racial differences in the impact of comorbidities on survival among elderly men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mary Putt; Judith A Long; Chantal Montagnet; Jeffrey H Silber; Virginia W Chang; J Sanford Schwartz; Craig Evan Pollack; Yu-Ning Wong; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.929

7.  The ten-year rule revisited: accuracy of clinicians' estimates of life expectancy in patients with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Murray D Krahn; Karen E Bremner; Jamil Asaria; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Robert Nam; George Tomlinson; Michael A S Jewett; Padraig Warde; Gary Naglie
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Use of algorithms as determinants for individual patient decision making: national comprehensive cancer network versus artificial neural networks.

Authors:  E David Crawford
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Prognostic importance of comorbidity in a hospital-based cancer registry.

Authors:  Jay F Piccirillo; Ryan M Tierney; Irene Costas; Lori Grove; Edward L Spitznagel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 10.  Quality of life after treatment for prostate cancer.

Authors:  David F Penson; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.862

View more
  10 in total

1.  Treatment of localized prostate cancer in elderly patients.

Authors:  Mohammed Haseebuddin; Marc C Smaldone
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-08

2.  More Judicious Use of Expectant Management for Localized Prostate Cancer during the Last 2 Decades.

Authors:  J B Eifler; J Alvarez; T Koyama; R M Conwill; C R Ritch; K E Hoffman; M J Resnick; D F Penson; D A Barocas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Examining Urban and Rural Differences in How Distance to Care Influences the Initiation and Completion of Treatment among Insured Cervical Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lisa P Spees; Wendy R Brewster; Mahesh A Varia; Morris Weinberger; Christopher Baggett; Xi Zhou; Victoria M Petermann; Stephanie B Wheeler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 4.  How to implement a geriatric assessment in your clinical practice.

Authors:  Schroder Sattar; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Hans Wildiers; Martine T E Puts
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-09-03

5.  The Role of Provider Characteristics in the Selection of Surgery or Radiation for Localized Prostate Cancer and Association With Quality of Care Indicators.

Authors:  Raj Satkunasivam; Mary Lo; Mariana Stern; Inderbir S Gill; Steven Fleming; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Roger T Anderson; Trevor D Thompson; Ann S Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.339

6.  Evaluating the urban-rural paradox: The complicated relationship between distance and the receipt of guideline-concordant care among cervical cancer patients.

Authors:  Lisa P Spees; Stephanie B Wheeler; Mahesh Varia; Morris Weinberger; Christopher D Baggett; Xi Zhou; Victoria M Petermann; Wendy R Brewster
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Type and dose of radiotherapy used for initial treatment of non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Dian Wang; Alex Ho; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Mary Lo; Steven Fleming; Michael Goodman; Trevor Thompson; Jean Owen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 8.  Integrating Geriatric Assessment into Decision-Making after Prostatectomy: Adjuvant Radiotherapy, Salvage Radiotherapy, or None?

Authors:  Aurore Goineau; Bénédicte d'Aillières; Laure de Decker; Stéphane Supiot
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 6.244

9.  Advanced Imaging and Receipt of Guideline Concordant Care in Women with Early Stage Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Diana S M Buist; Laura S Gold; Steven Zeliadt; Rachel Hunter Merrill; Ruth Etzioni; Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan; Larry Kessler
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-07-25

10.  Increased curative treatment is associated with decreased prostate cancer-specific and overall mortality in senior adults with high-risk prostate cancer; results from a national registry-based cohort study.

Authors:  Kirsti Aas; Sophie Dorothea Fosså; Tor Åge Myklebust; Bjørn Møller; Rune Kvåle; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Viktor Berge
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 4.452

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.