Ann S Hamilton1, Steven T Fleming, Dian Wang, Michael Goodman, Xiao-Cheng Wu, Jean B Owen, Mary Lo, Alex Ho, Roger T Anderson, Trevor Thompson. 1. *Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA †University of Kentucky College of Public Health, Lexington, KY ‡Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI §Department of Epidemiology, Emory University School of Public Health **Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA ∥Epidemiology Program, School of Public Health, LSU Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, LA ¶American College of Radiology, Clinical Research Center, Philadelphia #Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which initial therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer was concordant with nationally recognized guidelines using supplemented cancer registry data and what factors were associated with receipt of nonguideline-concordant care. METHODS: Initial therapy for 8229 nonmetastatic prostate cancer cases diagnosed in 2004 from cancer registries in 7 states was abstracted as part of the Centers for Disease Control's Patterns of Care Breast and Prostate Cancer study conducted during 2007 to 2009. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines version 1.2002 was used as the standard of care based on recurrence risk group and life expectancy (LE). A multivariable model was used to determine risk factors associated with receipt of nonguideline-concordant care. RESULTS: Nearly 80% with nonmetastatic prostate cancer received guideline-concordant care for initial therapy. Receipt of nonguideline-concordant care (including receiving either less aggressive therapy or more aggressive therapy than indicated) was related to older age, African American race/ethnicity, being unmarried, rural residence, and especially to being in the high recurrence risk group where receiving less aggressive therapy than indicated occurred more often than receiving more aggressive therapy (adjusted OR=4.2; 95% CL, 3.5-5.2 vs. low-risk group). Compared with life table estimates adjusted for comorbidity, physicians tended to underestimate LE. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of less aggressive therapy than indicated among high-risk group men with >5-year LE based on life table estimates adjusted for comorbidity was a concern. Physicians may tend to underestimate 5-year survival among this group and should be alerted to the importance of recommending aggressive therapy when warranted. However, based on more recent guidelines, among those with low-risk disease, the proportion considered to be receiving less aggressive therapy than indicated may now be lower because active surveillance is now considered appropriate.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which initial therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer was concordant with nationally recognized guidelines using supplemented cancer registry data and what factors were associated with receipt of nonguideline-concordant care. METHODS: Initial therapy for 8229 nonmetastatic prostate cancer cases diagnosed in 2004 from cancer registries in 7 states was abstracted as part of the Centers for Disease Control's Patterns of Care Breast and Prostate Cancer study conducted during 2007 to 2009. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines version 1.2002 was used as the standard of care based on recurrence risk group and life expectancy (LE). A multivariable model was used to determine risk factors associated with receipt of nonguideline-concordant care. RESULTS: Nearly 80% with nonmetastatic prostate cancer received guideline-concordant care for initial therapy. Receipt of nonguideline-concordant care (including receiving either less aggressive therapy or more aggressive therapy than indicated) was related to older age, African American race/ethnicity, being unmarried, rural residence, and especially to being in the high recurrence risk group where receiving less aggressive therapy than indicated occurred more often than receiving more aggressive therapy (adjusted OR=4.2; 95% CL, 3.5-5.2 vs. low-risk group). Compared with life table estimates adjusted for comorbidity, physicians tended to underestimate LE. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of less aggressive therapy than indicated among high-risk group men with >5-year LE based on life table estimates adjusted for comorbidity was a concern. Physicians may tend to underestimate 5-year survival among this group and should be alerted to the importance of recommending aggressive therapy when warranted. However, based on more recent guidelines, among those with low-risk disease, the proportion considered to be receiving less aggressive therapy than indicated may now be lower because active surveillance is now considered appropriate.
Authors: Steven T Fleming; Ann S Hamilton; Susan A Sabatino; Gretchen G Kimmick; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Jean B Owen; Bin Huang; Wenke Hwang Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mary Putt; Judith A Long; Chantal Montagnet; Jeffrey H Silber; Virginia W Chang; J Sanford Schwartz; Craig Evan Pollack; Yu-Ning Wong; Katrina Armstrong Journal: Med Care Res Rev Date: 2009-04-08 Impact factor: 3.929
Authors: Murray D Krahn; Karen E Bremner; Jamil Asaria; Shabbir M H Alibhai; Robert Nam; George Tomlinson; Michael A S Jewett; Padraig Warde; Gary Naglie Journal: Urology Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: J B Eifler; J Alvarez; T Koyama; R M Conwill; C R Ritch; K E Hoffman; M J Resnick; D F Penson; D A Barocas Journal: J Urol Date: 2016-10-27 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Lisa P Spees; Wendy R Brewster; Mahesh A Varia; Morris Weinberger; Christopher Baggett; Xi Zhou; Victoria M Petermann; Stephanie B Wheeler Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Raj Satkunasivam; Mary Lo; Mariana Stern; Inderbir S Gill; Steven Fleming; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Roger T Anderson; Trevor D Thompson; Ann S Hamilton Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: Lisa P Spees; Stephanie B Wheeler; Mahesh Varia; Morris Weinberger; Christopher D Baggett; Xi Zhou; Victoria M Petermann; Wendy R Brewster Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Dian Wang; Alex Ho; Ann S Hamilton; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Mary Lo; Steven Fleming; Michael Goodman; Trevor Thompson; Jean Owen Journal: Radiat Oncol Date: 2014-02-05 Impact factor: 3.481
Authors: Elizabeth Trice Loggers; Diana S M Buist; Laura S Gold; Steven Zeliadt; Rachel Hunter Merrill; Ruth Etzioni; Scott D Ramsey; Sean D Sullivan; Larry Kessler Journal: Int J Breast Cancer Date: 2016-07-25
Authors: Kirsti Aas; Sophie Dorothea Fosså; Tor Åge Myklebust; Bjørn Møller; Rune Kvåle; Ljiljana Vlatkovic; Viktor Berge Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 4.452