Literature DB >> 12667883

National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines for the management of prostate cancer.

Douglas Scherr1, Peter W Swindle, Peter T Scardino.   

Abstract

Guidelines for the management of prostate cancer issued by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network provide a basis for rational treatment decisions. These guidelines represent consensus recommendations by a panel of experts that are evidence based and are designated according to the degree of consensus within the expert panel. The initial stratification point is the patient's life expectancy (>5 or <5 years). If life expectancy is >5 years, the recommended intervention is based on clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, and Gleason score, as well as the presence of symptoms. These assessments establish the patient's risk of recurrence after therapy. Specific initial therapies are then recommended according to whether the risk category is low, intermediate, high, or very high. The guidelines also describe the appropriate use of observation ("watchful waiting") versus active intervention in certain patients. After definitive therapy, patients should be monitored with PSA determinations, digital rectal examination, and bone scans, as outlined in the guidelines. Patients who exhibit increasing PSA levels after prostatectomy are candidates for salvage therapy with androgen ablation, radiotherapy, or observation. If PSA levels begin to increase after radiotherapy, surgery may then be an additional option. Systemic salvage therapy generally consists of androgen ablation; the benefit of total androgen blockade versus initial monotherapy remains controversial. Relapse after initial androgen ablation is treated with an antiandrogen, if none had been administered previously. Patients refractory to further hormonal manipulations are observed or receive palliative therapy, including chemotherapy. The treatment of prostate cancer is complex. Optimal treatment is risk-adapted to the specific characteristics of the cancer and the expected longevity and personal preferences of the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12667883     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02395-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  33 in total

Review 1.  Is XMRV a causal virus for prostate cancer?

Authors:  Zhen-Zhen Zhang; Bao-Feng Guo; Zhuang Feng; Ling Zhang; Xue-Jian Zhao
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.285

2.  The fat body mass increase after adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy is predictive of prostate cancer outcome.

Authors:  Consuelo Buttigliero; Federica Vana; Valentina Bertaglia; Francesca Vignani; Cristian Fiori; Giangiacomo Osella; Francesco Porpiglia; Marcello Tucci; Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Alfredo Berruti
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 3.633

3.  [Guideline adherence - is more always better?].

Authors:  M J Nothacker
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Clinical and Demographic Factors Associated With Receipt of Non Guideline-concordant Initial Therapy for Nonmetastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ann S Hamilton; Steven T Fleming; Dian Wang; Michael Goodman; Xiao-Cheng Wu; Jean B Owen; Mary Lo; Alex Ho; Roger T Anderson; Trevor Thompson
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.339

5.  Incremental value of magnetic resonance imaging in the advanced management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Liang Wang
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2009-12-31

Review 6.  Functional imaging for prostate cancer: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Carina Mari Aparici; Youngho Seo
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.446

7.  Factors associated with initial treatment and survival for clinically localized prostate cancer: results from the CDC-NPCR Patterns of Care Study (PoC1).

Authors:  Maria J Schymura; Amy R Kahn; Robert R German; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Rosemary D Cress; Jack L Finch; John P Fulton; Tiefu Shen; Erik Stuckart
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  The relation between age and androgen deprivation therapy use among men in the Medicare population receiving radiation therapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer L Quon; James B Yu; Pamela R Soulos; Cary P Gross
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Concordance between transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy results and radical prostatectomy final pathology: Are we getting better at predicting final pathology?

Authors:  Richard Walker; Uri Lindner; Alyssa Louis; Robin Kalnin; Marguerite Ennis; Michael Nesbitt; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Antonio Finelli; Neil E Fleshner; Alexandre R Zlotta; Michael A S Jewett; Robert Hamilton; Girish Kulkarni; John Trachtenberg
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Oncological results, functional outcomes and health-related quality-of-life in men who received a radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a study on long-term patient outcome with risk stratification.

Authors:  Itsuhiro Takizawa; Noboru Hara; Tsutomu Nishiyama; Masaaki Kaneko; Tatsuhiko Hoshii; Emiko Tsuchida; Kota Takahashi
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.