Literature DB >> 24388202

Prognostic factors of oncologic and reproductive outcomes in fertility-sparing management of endometrial atypical hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Martin Koskas1, Jennifer Uzan2, Dominique Luton3, Roman Rouzier4, Emile Daraï5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the various possible prognostic factors on the fertility-sparing management of atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer; to generate survival curves to estimate remission and recurrence rates according to time.
DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42013004557.
SETTING: University hospital. PATIENT(S): Patients who underwent fertility-sparing management for atypical hyperplasia and endometrial cancer. INTERVENTION(S): All published studies were identified through MEDLINE and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Remission, recurrence, progression, and pregnancy rates by age, obesity, infertility, previous pregnancy, histology, and medical treatment. RESULT(S): A total of 370 patients from 24 studies were included. The 12- and 24-month remission probabilities were 78.0% and 81.4%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, previous pregnancy (odds ratio [OR] 2.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23-5.89), infertility (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.05-4.87), and treatment with megestrol acetate (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.20-6.02) were associated with higher remission probability. The 12- and 24-month recurrence probabilities were 9.6% and 29.2%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, none of the factors studied was associated with higher recurrence probability. Twenty-two studies totaling 351 patients were used to assess pregnancy rate; 111 subjects (32%) had one pregnancy or more. In multivariate analysis, none of the factors were associated with pregnancy probability. Among the 263 patients used to assess progression rate, 39 (15%) had a tumor with at least myometrial invasion on the hysterectomy specimen. Endometrial cancer and the use of other medical therapies (in comparison with megestrol acetate) were associated with an increased probability of progression. CONCLUSION(S): Fertility-sparing management should not be contraindicated in older patients with previous infertility or obesity.
Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility sparing; conservative; endometrial atypical hyperplasia; endometrial cancer; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24388202     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  34 in total

1.  National patterns of care and fertility outcomes for reproductive-aged women with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Ross F Harrison; Weiguo He; Shuangshuang Fu; Hui Zhao; Charlotte C Sun; Rudy S Suidan; Terri L Woodard; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain; Shannon N Westin; Sharon H Giordano; Larissa A Meyer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Current state of fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult patients with gynecological cancer.

Authors:  Tatsuru Ohara; Shiho Kuji; Tomo Takenaga; Haruka Imai; Hiraku Endo; Ryo Kanamori; Jun Takeuchi; Yuko Nagasawa; Noriyuki Yokomichi; Haruhiro Kondo; Imari Deura; Akiko Tozawa; Nao Suzuki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Analysis of IVF/ICSI outcomes in infertile women with early-stage endometrial cancer and atypical endometrial hyperplasia after conservative treatment.

Authors:  Yaxing Guo; Xuan Zong; Hongzhen Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 4.  Fertility preservation in reproductive age women with cancer.

Authors:  Peter Kovacs
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-10-30

5.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer: A Cochrane Systematic Review Protocol.

Authors:  Maria-Eulalia Fernandez-Montoli; Jordi Sabadell; Nayanar-Adela Contreras-Perez
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 6.  Fertility-preservation in endometrial cancer: is it safe? Review of the literature.

Authors:  Márcia Mendonça Carneiro; Rívia Mara Lamaita; Márcia Cristina França Ferreira; Agnaldo Lopes Silva-Filho
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2016-12-01

7.  Polycystic Ovarian Morphology may be a Positive Prognostic Factor in Patients with Endometrial Cancer who Achieved Complete Remission after Fertility-Sparing Therapy with Progestin

Authors:  Yamato Fukui; Ayumi Taguchi; Katsuyuki Adachi; Marie Sato; Akira Kawata; Michihiro Tanikawa; Kenbun Sone; Mayuyo Mori; Kazunori Nagasaka; Yoko Matsumoto; Takahide Arimoto; Katsutoshi Oda; Yutaka Osuga; Tomoyuki Fujii
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2017-11-26

Review 8.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early-Stage Cervical, Ovarian, and Endometrial Malignancies.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Terri Woodard; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.623

9.  ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up.

Authors:  Nicoletta Colombo; Carien Creutzberg; Frederic Amant; Tjalling Bosse; Antonio González-Martín; Jonathan Ledermann; Christian Marth; Remi Nout; Denis Querleu; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Cristiana Sessa
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Fertility preserving treatment with hysteroscopic resection followed by progestin therapy in young women with early endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Francesca Falcone; Giuseppe Laurelli; Simona Losito; Marilena Di Napoli; Vincenza Granata; Stefano Greggi
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 4.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.