Literature DB >> 31128110

National patterns of care and fertility outcomes for reproductive-aged women with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia.

Ross F Harrison1, Weiguo He2, Shuangshuang Fu2, Hui Zhao2, Charlotte C Sun1, Rudy S Suidan1, Terri L Woodard1, J Alejandro Rauh-Hain1, Shannon N Westin1, Sharon H Giordano2, Larissa A Meyer3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although it is uncommon, the incidence of endometrial cancer and atypical hyperplasia among reproductive-aged women is increasing. The fertility outcomes in this population are not well described.
OBJECTIVE: We aim to describe the patterns of care and fertility outcomes of reproductive-aged women with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of women aged ≤45 years with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia diagnosed in 2000 to 2014 were identified in Truven Marketscan, an insurance claims database of commercially insured patients in the United States. Treatment information, including use of progestin therapy, hysterectomy, and assisted fertility services, was identified and collected using a combination of Common Procedural Terminology codes, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems codes, and National Drug Codes. Pregnancy events were identified from claims data using a similar technique. Patients were categorized as receiving progestin therapy alone, progestin therapy followed by hysterectomy, or standard surgical management with hysterectomy alone. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors associated with receiving fertility-sparing treatment.
RESULTS: A total of 4007 reproductive-aged patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia were identified. The majority of these patients (n = 3189; 79.6%) received standard surgical management. Of the 818 patients treated initially with progestins, 397 (48.5%) subsequently underwent hysterectomy, whereas 421 (51.5%) did not. Patients treated with progestin therapy had a lower median age than those who received standard surgical management (median age, 36 vs 41 years; P < .001). The proportion of patients receiving progestin therapy increased significantly over the observation period, with 24.9% treated at least initially with progestin therapy in 2014 (P < .001). Multivariable analysis shows that younger age, a diagnosis of atypical hyperplasia diagnosis rather than endometrial cancer, and diagnosis later in the study period were all associated with a greater likelihood of receiving progestin therapy (P < .0001). Among the 421 patients who received progestin therapy alone, 92 patients (21.8%; 92/421) had 131 pregnancies, including 49 live births for a live birth rate of 11.6%. Among the 397 patients treated with progestin therapy followed by hysterectomy, 25 patients (6.3%; 25/397) had 34 pregnancies with 13 live births. The median age of patients who experienced a live birth following diagnosis during the study period was 36 years (interquartile range, 33-38). The use of some form of assisted fertility services was observed in 15.5% patients who were treated with progestin therapy. Among patients who experienced any pregnancy event following diagnosis, 54% of patients used some form of fertility treatment. For patients who experienced a live birth following diagnosis, 50% of patients received fertility treatment. Median time to live birth following diagnosis was 756 days (interquartile range, 525-1077). Patients treated with progestin therapy were more likely to experience a live birth if they had used assisted fertility services (odds ratio, 5.9; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-10.1; P < .0001).
CONCLUSION: The number of patients who received fertility-sparing treatment for endometrial cancer or atypical hyperplasia increased over time. However, the proportion of women who experience a live birth following these diagnoses is relatively small.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometrial cancer; endometrial hyperplasia; fertility; fertility conservation; fertility-sparing treatment; health services research; oncofertility

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31128110      PMCID: PMC7069241          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

1.  Obesity and reproduction: a committee opinion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Conservative management of endometrial cancer: a survey amongst European clinicians.

Authors:  M La Russa; I Zapardiel; M J Halaska; K Zalewski; R Laky; P Dursun; D Lindquist; V Sukhin; S Polterauer; I Biliatis
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  All-cause mortality in young women with endometrial cancer receiving progesterone therapy.

Authors:  Maria P Ruiz; Yongmei Huang; June Y Hou; Ana I Tergas; William M Burke; Cande V Ananth; Alfred I Neugut; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 4.  Prognostic factors of oncologic and reproductive outcomes in fertility-sparing management of endometrial atypical hyperplasia and adenocarcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Martin Koskas; Jennifer Uzan; Dominique Luton; Roman Rouzier; Emile Daraï
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 5.  Endometrial cancer: a review and current management strategies: part I.

Authors:  William M Burke; James Orr; Mario Leitao; Emery Salom; Paola Gehrig; Alexander B Olawaiye; Molly Brewer; Dave Boruta; Jeannine Villella; Jeanine Villella; Tom Herzog; Fadi Abu Shahin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 6.  Oral progestogens vs levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for endometrial hyperplasia: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Ioannis D Gallos; Manjeet Shehmar; Shakila Thangaratinam; Thalis K Papapostolou; Arri Coomarasamy; Janesh K Gupta
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 8.661

7.  Treatment of Low-Risk Endometrial Cancer and Complex Atypical Hyperplasia With the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device.

Authors:  Navdeep Pal; Russell R Broaddus; Diana L Urbauer; Nyla Balakrishnan; Andrea Milbourne; Kathleen M Schmeler; Larissa A Meyer; Pamela T Soliman; Karen H Lu; Pedro T Ramirez; Lois Ramondetta; Diane C Bodurka; Shannon N Westin
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Pregnancy and oncologic outcomes after fertility-sparing management for early stage endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Su Hyun Chae; Seung-Hyuk Shim; Sun Joo Lee; Ji Young Lee; Soo-Nyung Kim; Soon-Beom Kang
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.437

Review 9.  Female age-related fertility decline. Committee Opinion No. 589.

Authors: 
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 10.  Comparison of fertility-sparing treatments in patients with early endometrial cancer and atypical complex hyperplasia: A meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Jing Wei; Weiyuan Zhang; Limin Feng; Wanli Gao
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  6 in total

1.  Analysis of Factors Associated With Recurrence of Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma and Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia in Infertile Women After In Vitro Fertilization Treatment.

Authors:  Yaxing Guo; Xuan Zong; Hongzhen Li; Jie Qiao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  Fertility after Cancer: Risks and Successes.

Authors:  Chiara Di Tucci; Giulia Galati; Giulia Mattei; Alessandra Chinè; Alice Fracassi; Ludovico Muzii
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Automated system for diagnosing endometrial cancer by adopting deep-learning technology in hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Yu Takahashi; Kenbun Sone; Katsuhiko Noda; Kaname Yoshida; Yusuke Toyohara; Kosuke Kato; Futaba Inoue; Asako Kukita; Ayumi Taguchi; Haruka Nishida; Yuichiro Miyamoto; Michihiro Tanikawa; Tetsushi Tsuruga; Takayuki Iriyama; Kazunori Nagasaka; Yoko Matsumoto; Yasushi Hirota; Osamu Hiraike-Wada; Katsutoshi Oda; Masanori Maruyama; Yutaka Osuga; Tomoyuki Fujii
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Chances of pregnancy and live birth among women undergoing conservative management of early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Erica Herrera Cappelletti; Jonas Humann; Rafael Torrejón; Pietro Gambadauro
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 5.  Contemporary Fertility-Sparing Management Options of Early Stage Endometrioid Endometrial Cancer in Young Nulliparous Patients.

Authors:  Gulzhanat Aimagambetova; Sanja Terzic; Antonio Simone Laganà; Gauri Bapayeva; Philip la Fleur; Milan Terzic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 6.  Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early-Stage Cervical, Ovarian, and Endometrial Malignancies.

Authors:  Roni Nitecki; Terri Woodard; J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 7.623

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.