Literature DB >> 24386987

Age and response bias: evidence from the strength-based mirror effect.

Amy H Criss1, William Aue, Aslı Kılıç.   

Abstract

Performance in episodic memory is determined both by accurate retrieval from memory and by decision processes. A substantial body of literature suggests slightly poorer episodic memory accuracy for older than younger adults; however, age-related changes in the decision mechanisms in memory have received much less attention. Response bias, the willingness to endorse an item as remembered, is an important decision factor that contributes to episodic memory performance, and therefore understanding age-related changes in response bias is critical to theoretical development. We manipulate list strength in order to investigate two aspects of response bias. First, we evaluate whether criterion placement in episodic memory differs for older and younger adults. Second, we ask whether older adults have the same degree of flexibility to adjust the criterion in response to task demands as younger adults. Participants were tested on weakly and strongly encoded lists where word frequency (Experiment 1) or similarity between targets and foils (Experiment 2) was manipulated. Both older and younger adults had higher hit rates and lower false-alarm rates for strong lists than for weak lists (i.e., a strength-based mirror effect). Older adults were more conservative (less likely to endorse an item as studied) than younger adults, and we found no evidence that older and younger adults differ in their ability to flexibly adjust their criterion based on the demands of the task.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Episodic memory; Memory models; Mirror effects; Recognition memory; Response bias

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24386987     DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.874037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)        ISSN: 1747-0218            Impact factor:   2.143


  3 in total

1.  They can take a hint: Older adults effectively integrate memory cues during recognition.

Authors:  Alex Konkel; Diana Selmeczy; Ian G Dobbins
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2015-12

2.  Age effects on category learning, categorical perception, and generalization.

Authors:  Caitlin R Bowman; Stefania R Ashby; Dagmar Zeithamova
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2021-11-11

Review 3.  Age differences in sustained attention tasks: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Antonino Vallesi; Virginia Tronelli; Francesco Lomi; Rachele Pezzetta
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-03-26
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.