| Literature DB >> 24386251 |
Sara Santos1, Cláudia S Baptista2, Rui M V Abreu3, Estela Bastos4, Irina Amorim5, Ivo G Gut6, Fátima Gärtner5, Raquel Chaves4.
Abstract
Human ERBB2 is a proto-oncogene that codes for the erbB-2 epithelial growth factor receptor. In human breast cancer (HBC), erbB-2 protein overexpression has been repeatedly correlated with poor prognosis. In more recent works, underexpression of this gene has been described in HBC. Moreover, it is also recognised that oncogenes that are commonly amplified or deleted encompass point mutations, and some of these are associated with HBC. In cat mammary lesions (CMLs), the overexpression of ERBB2 (27%-59.6%) has also been described, mostly at the protein level and although cat mammary neoplasias are considered to be a natural model of HBC, molecular information is still scarce. In the present work, a cat ERBB2 fragment, comprising exons 10 to 15 (ERBB2_10-15) was achieved for the first time. Allelic variants and genomic haplotype analyses were also performed, and differences between normal and CML populations were observed. Three amino acid changes, corresponding to 3 non-synonymous genomic sequence variants that were only detected in CMLs, were proposed to damage the 3D structure of the protein. We analysed the cat ERBB2 gene at the DNA (copy number determination), mRNA (expression levels assessment) and protein levels (in extra- and intra protein domains) in CML samples and correlated the last two evaluations with clinicopathological features. We found a positive correlation between the expression levels of the ERBB2 RNA and erbB-2 protein, corresponding to the intracellular region. Additionally, we detected a positive correlation between higher mRNA expression and better clinical outcome. Our results suggest that the ERBB2 gene is post-transcriptionally regulated and that proteins with truncations and single point mutations are present in cat mammary neoplastic lesions. We would like to emphasise that the recurrent occurrence of low erbB-2 expression levels in cat mammary tumours, suggests the cat mammary neoplasias as a valuable model for erbB-2 negative HBC.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24386251 PMCID: PMC3873372 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083673
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1In silico physical map of cat ERBB2 gene from exons 10 to 15 (ERBB2_10–15).
Physical mapping of exons 10 to 15 (red arrows) and the de novo sequence genomic DNA (blue arrow; 84nt from 315–398 bp) corresponding to part of intron 11 of the cat ERBB2 gene. The position of the four primers are point out in black arrows. The sequence variants detected in the present work are illustrated by its position nucleotide number and a black asterisk. The distribution of the genomic SVs detected is not homogeneous and they are predominantly localized in intron 11.
Frequent haplotypes detected independently in normal, mammary lesions and in total groups of samples.
| Genomic SVs and Haplotypes | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | A | T | C | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | — | G | A | T |
|
| |
| 2 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | T | C | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | A | T |
| ||
| 3 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | G | C | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | A | T |
|
| |
| 4 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | A | G | C | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | A | T |
| ||
| 5 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | A | T | C | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | A | T |
|
| |
| 6 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | G | T | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | — | G | A | T |
|
| |
| 7 | A | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | C | G | A | T | C | G | G | G | T | T | C | G | A | C | C | G | G | — | G | A | T |
|
| |
| 8 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | T | T | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | A | T |
|
| |
| 9 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | G | T | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | A | T |
|
| |
| 10 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | T | C | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | C | C |
| ||
| 11 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | T | C | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | C | T |
| ||
| 12 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | A | G | T | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | A | T |
| ||
| 13 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | G | C | G | G | G | T | T | C | A | A | C | C | G | G | — | G | A | T |
| ||
| 14 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | A | G | C | G | G | G | T | T | C | A | A | C | C | G | G | — | G | A | T |
| ||
| 15 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | T | T | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | C | C | C | C | G | A | C | C | C |
| ||
| 16 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | A | T | C | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | C | C | C | C | G | A | G | A | C |
| ||
| 17 | G | A | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | A | G | C | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | C | C |
| ||
| 18 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | T | T | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | C | C | C | C | G | A | C | A | C |
| ||
| 19 | G | T | T | T | G | G | G | C | T | G | G | G | C | G | G | G | T | T | T | G | A | C | C | G | G | A | G | A | C |
| ||
Only the haplotypes detected with frequency value > 0.05 (>5% population) were considered for analysis. The variant alleles are emphasize in bold. Haplotype number 2 correspond to ERBB2_10-15 wild-type sequence (GeneBank: JQ284376). (*) SVs with exonic positions. (*3, 4) Two synonymous sequence variants. (*1, 2, 5, 6, 7) five non-synonymous SVs corresponding to five amino acid changes: Arg46Lys; Val47Glu; Ala205Pro; His206Pro and Val214Ala. (#) g.271T>A and g.271T>G multi-allelic SV; (—) allelic deletion.
Figure 23D models of wild-type and variant cat ErB-2_10-15 protein.
(a) Superimposed extracellular domain of human erbB-2 (orange) and wt cat erbB-2 homology model (yellow). Residues where mutations were observed are labelled. (b) Superimposed conformation of the wt (yellow) and Val47Glu variant (green) cat erbB-2 homology model. (c) Superimposed conformation of the wt (yellow) and Arg46Lys variant (green) cat erbB-2 homology model. Structures are represented in cartoon format and H-bonds are represented in traced line using the respective structure colour code.
Figure 3Immunohistochemical evaluation of erbB-2 in cat normal mammary tissues and in mammary gland lesions.
Normal samples (a; b), hyperplasic lesions (c; d) and neoplastic benign lesions (e; f) showing strong and complete membrane labelling (score 3+) with the two antibodies used in IHC test: CB11/int and CBE356/ext. Tubulopapillary lesions depicting 1+ score for HIC CBE356/ext staining (g) and no labeling with CB11/int staining (h). Cribiform lesions with moderate and complete membrane labelling (2+) for CBE356/ext antibody (i) and 3+ score for CB11/int antibody (j). Lymph node mammary metastatic lesion depicting 3+ scores for both antibodies (k; l). Images original magnifications 400× (a; b; i-l); 40× (c; d); 100× (e; f); 200× (g; h). (g′-l′) 300× amplification of the image highlight by white squares in the correspondent (g-l).
Figure 4Percentage of immunohistochemistry erbB-2 positives samples.
Percentage of HIC erbB-2 positive samples in the different groups of samples. The Results show in outer ring correspond to extracellular antibody (CBE356/ext) and in the inner ring correspond to intracellular antibody (CB11/int).
Figure 5ERBB2 RNA expression in mammary lesions samples.
The graphic with two independent Y axis illustrates the measure of RNA expression output as concentration_ratio_x_100 mean values (left Y axis with red values) with standard deviation values (black lines in red columns) and also the analysis of lesion/normal mean values ratio (right Y axis with blue values) for each sample and groups of samples.
Resume of the significant two-tailed bivariate correlation results between ERBB2 RNA, erbB-2 protein expression levels, and clinicopathological features of mammary lesions.
| Protein | RNA | Sequence Variants | ||||||||||
| CB11/Int | CBE356/Ext | Conc ratio X 100 | Lesion/normal ratio | g.271 T>G | g.280 G>A | g.311 G>A | g.327 T>G | g.335 C>T | g.1754 A>C | g.1914 G>C | g.1994 del A | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Histological Class |
|
| ||||||||||
| Age (Years) |
| |||||||||||
| Lesion size |
|
| ||||||||||
| Pleomorphism |
| |||||||||||
| Lesions number |
| |||||||||||
| Lymphatic invasion |
|
|
| |||||||||
| Vascular infiltration |
| |||||||||||
| Clinical Outcome |
|
| ||||||||||
|
| Ni | |||||||||||
| CB11/int |
|
|
| |||||||||
| CBE356/ext | ||||||||||||
|
| Ni | |||||||||||
| Conc_ratio_X_100 |
| |||||||||||
The significant values of the Pearson's correlation analysis were confirmed by the Spearman's test.
(#) Significant correlation only by Spearman's test.
(*) Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level.
(**) Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level.
(p: positive; n: negative) Indication of the direction of the relationship between variables.
(Ni) Sequence variants were not included in correlation test with RNA RT-qPCR and protein IHC.
Resume of the main outcomes concerning genomic sequence variants (SVs) detected.
| Genomic sequence variants | |||||||
| g.226G>A | g.229T>A | g.355G>A | g.1914G>C | g.2037G>C | g.2041A>C | g.2065T>C | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 7.69 | ||||||
|
| 37.50 | 25.00 |
|
| |||
|
| 18.75 | 25.00 | 16.67 |
|
| ||
|
|
| 33.33 | 16.67 |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||
|
| 15.38 | ||||||
|
| 75.00 | 50.00 |
|
| |||
|
| 37.50 | 50.00 | 33.33 |
|
| ||
|
|
| 00.00 | 33.33 |
|
| ||
|
| |||||||
|
| No |
| Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| No |
| No | Yes | Yes |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| No |
| Yes | Yes | No |
|
|
|
| |||||||
|
| Exon 11 |
| Intron 12 | Intron 14 | Exon 15 |
|
|
|
| 7 |
| No | 15; 16; 18 | 15; 18 |
|
|
|
| 8 |
| <0.05 | 0.15 | 0.1 |
|
|
|
| Arg46Lys |
| NA | NA | Ala205Pro |
|
|
|
| Benign |
| NA | NA | Benign |
|
|
Sequence variants key marks reveal by experimental, statistic and in silico analysis. A detailed integrative analysis of nsSVs and their corresponding amino acid changes. The haplotypes corresponds to the frequent haplotypes detected in total samples (frequency >5%). SVs with probably damage effect in protein are in bold text. (%) Percentage. (NA) not applicable. (No) not observed.