Literature DB >> 14991893

Comparative multi-methodological measurement of ERBB2 status in breast cancer.

Christophe Ginestier1, Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret, Frédérique Penault-Llorca, Jeannine Geneix, José Adélaïde, Max Chaffanet, Marie-Joëlle Mozziconacci, Jacques Hassoun, Patrice Viens, Daniel Birnbaum, Jocelyne Jacquemier.   

Abstract

The ERBB2 transmembrane tyrosine kinase receptor is both a prognostic marker and a therapeutic target in breast cancer. Accurate determination of ERBB2 status is a prerequisite for the establishment of prognostic significance and for the selection of ERBB2-overexpressing breast tumours for specific treatment. Unfortunately, there is no complete agreement on how this determination should be performed. This study has compared four methods of assessment of ERBB2 status. Two global, extraction-based methods using real-time quantitative PCR on DNA (Q-PCR) or RNA (RQ-PCR) and two non-global, tissue-based methods, ie fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), were used. The 94 breast cancers tested were enriched in cases scoring 2+ using the IHC scoring system currently in use and for which the actual ERBB2 status remains ill defined. To determine the best parameters and reagents for assessment, two protocols for FISH and five anti-ERBB2 antibodies were used, and both FISH and IHC were carried out on the same tissue microarrays (TMAs). It is shown that the combination of the two tissue-based methods gives the best results. The use of either PCR-based method did not improve the results significantly. A new combined IHC score based on the association of two selected anti-ERBB2 antibodies (HercepTest trade mark and TAB250) and a dual scale for improved assessment of ERBB2 protein expression, particularly in 2+ cases, are proposed. Copyright 2004 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14991893     DOI: 10.1002/path.1523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol        ISSN: 0022-3417            Impact factor:   7.996


  16 in total

1.  Use of tissue microarray for interlaboratory validation of HER2 immunocytochemical and FISH testing.

Authors:  E Kay; A O'Grady; J M Morgan; S Wozniak; B Jasani
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Analysis of HER2 gene amplification using an automated fluorescence in situ hybridization signal enumeration system.

Authors:  Rachel Stevens; Imad Almanaseer; Miguel Gonzalez; Derin Caglar; Ryan A Knudson; Rhett P Ketterling; Daniel S Schrock; Thomas A Seemayer; Julia A Bridge
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.568

3.  Integrated Proteomic and Genomic Analysis of Gastric Cancer Patient Tissues.

Authors:  Julia Fangfei Yan; Hoguen Kim; Seul-Ki Jeong; Hyoung-Joo Lee; Manveen K Sethi; Ling Y Lee; Ronald C Beavis; Hogune Im; Michael P Snyder; Matan Hofree; Trey Ideker; Shiaw-Lin Wu; Young-Ki Paik; Susan Fanayan; William S Hancock
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  A modified approach for I-FISH evaluation of ERBB2 (HER-2) gene copy numbers in breast carcinomas: comparison with HER-2/CEP17 ratio system.

Authors:  Marcela Mrhalova; Roman Kodet
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-13       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Genome profiling of ERBB2-amplified breast cancers.

Authors:  Fabrice Sircoulomb; Ismahane Bekhouche; Pascal Finetti; José Adélaïde; Azza Ben Hamida; Julien Bonansea; Stéphane Raynaud; Charlène Innocenti; Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret; Carole Tarpin; Farhat Ben Ayed; Patrice Viens; Jocelyne Jacquemier; François Bertucci; Daniel Birnbaum; Max Chaffanet
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  The epidermal growth factor receptor family in breast cancer.

Authors:  Angelos K Koutras; T R Jeffry Evans
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2008-09-01       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  Immunohistochemical and molecular analyses of HER2 status in breast cancers are highly concordant and complementary approaches.

Authors:  J Lehmann-Che; F Amira-Bouhidel; E Turpin; M Antoine; H Soliman; L Legres; C Bocquet; R Bernoud; E Flandre; M Varna; A de Roquancourt; L-F Plassa; S Giacchetti; M Espié; C de Bazelaire; L Cahen-Doidy; E Bourstyn; A Janin; H de Thé; P Bertheau
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Synthesis and Characterization of Anti-HER2 Antibody Conjugated CdSe/CdZnS Quantum Dots for Fluorescence Imaging of Breast Cancer Cells.

Authors:  Dhermendra K Tiwari; Shin-Ichi Tanaka; Yasushi Inouye; Keiko Yoshizawa; Tomonobu M Watanabe; Takashi Jin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Evaluation of the prognostic significance of HER family mRNA expression in high-risk early breast cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) validation study.

Authors:  Angelos Koutras; Konstantine T Kalogeras; Ralph M Wirtz; Zoi Alexopoulou; Mattheos Bobos; Flora Zagouri; Elke Veltrup; Eleni Timotheadou; Helen Gogas; George Pentheroudakis; Nikolaos Pisanidis; Christina Magkou; Christos Christodoulou; Dimitrios Bafaloukos; Pavlos Papakostas; Gerasimos Aravantinos; Dimitrios Pectasides; Haralambos P Kalofonos; George Fountzilas
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  Evaluation of the prognostic and predictive value of HER family mRNA expression in high-risk early breast cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study.

Authors:  A K Koutras; K T Kalogeras; M-A Dimopoulos; R M Wirtz; U Dafni; E Briasoulis; D Pectasides; H Gogas; C Christodoulou; G Aravantinos; G Zografos; E Timotheadou; P Papakostas; H Linardou; E Razis; T Economopoulos; H P Kalofonos; G Fountzilas
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.